Cited by 261Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlTactile and Sensory Interactions

Brain structures involved in interoceptive awareness and cardioafferent signal processing: A dipole source localization study

Open access
Pollatos, Olga, Kirsch, Wladimir, Schandry, Rainer·2005·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Afferent signals from the body play an important role for emotional and motivational aspects of behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about the cortical and subcortical structures involved in interoceptive processes. Recently, a functional MRI study demonstrated that insula, somatomotor, and cingulated cortices are activated when subjects focus attention on their heartbeats. Aside from the use of imaging data, cardiac awareness has frequently been studied by using the heartbeat‐evoked potential (HEP), a brain wave that appears contingent on the heartbeat. The present study aimed at localizing sources of the HEP. Multichannel EEG was recorded in 44 subjects while they performed a heartbeat perception task. This task was used to quantify interoceptive awareness and to subdivide the subjects into good and poor heartbeat perceivers. Analyses showed highest HEP amplitudes over frontal and frontocentral electrode locations in the time range of later than 200 ms after R‐wave onset. By means of a BESA dipole‐source‐analysis, four sources of the HEP were identified which were located in the anterior cingulate, the right insula, the prefrontal cortex, and the left secondary somatosensory cortex. Good heartbeat perceivers showed both significantly higher HEP amplitudes and higher dipole strength than poor heartbeat perceivers in all four cortical sources. We conclude that the identified structures are involved in the processing of cardiac signals, whereby anterior cingulate and right insula seem to serve as interoceptive centers for cardioception. Hum Brain Mapping, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20121

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Turning attention inwards and explicitly attending to one's own heartbeats consistently modulates HERs.

    “Turning attention inwards and explicitly attending to one's own heartbeats consistently modulates HERs 92-98 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Experimental Procedure section says participants attended to their heartbeats during counting, and the HEP Amplitude, Source Modeling, and Interoceptive Awareness section reports higher HEP amplitudes in better heartbeat perceivers. The study does not compare attending to heartbeats with directing attention elsewhere, so it does not establish that turning attention inward itself modulates HEPs. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cameron OG (2002): Visceral sensory neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Jones GE (1994): Perception of visceral sensations: a review of recent findings, methodologies, and future directions. In: Ackles P, Jennings JR, Coles MGH, editors. Advances in psychophysiol- ogy, vol. 5. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; p 55-192.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollatos, O., Kirsch, W., & Schandry, R.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-25
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
54-64
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2125972773
Cited by
261
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
interoceptive awareness, heartbeat perception, heartbeat-evoked potentials, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, prefrontal cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex, dipole source localization, interoceptive sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Afferent Pathways, Awareness, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Female, Heart, Humans, Male, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review