The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 156 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions
Open accessAbstract
It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual‐process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual‐process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short‐term memory. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Improving the effects of early SWS-rich sleep on declarative memory appeared to be overall more consistent with free (or cued) recall measures than with recognition measures of memory (265, 326, 667, 966; see Ref. 297, for a review), possibly reflecting that unlike recollection, familiarity based recognition taps to a greater extent implicit components of these memories (1343,1344).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1344]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tulving, E. (1985) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0080017 · Cited by 4,638
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · Cited by 3,840
Self-citationA process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory
Jacoby, L. L. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90025-f · Cited by 3,817
Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,847 · cited 3×
“…and Brown, 2006; Diana et al., 2007), and have led to the development of a number of dual-process theories of recognition (e.g., Atkinson and Juola, 1974; Mandler, 1980; Jacoby, 1991; Yonelinas, 1994; Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Reder et al., 2000; Kelley and Wixted, 2001; Rotello et al., 2004).”
BackgroundThe Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory
Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 · Cited by 2,580 · cited 5×
“For example, in a review of remember/know, source memory and ROC studies that included recollection and familiarity contrasts, 16 of 19 studies showed that the hippocampus was involved in recollection, whereas only two showed hippocampal involvement in familiarity (Eichenbaum et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationInterhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man.
Milner, B. (1971) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070866 · Cited by 2,405 · cited 1×
“…1998; Kopelman et al., 2007), and damage to the PFC is associated with more pronounced deficits in tests of source memory than tests of item recognition (e.g., Milner, 1971; Milner et al., 1985; Janowsky et al., 1989; Shimamura et al., 1990; Johnson et al., 1997; but see Swick et al., 2006).”
BackgroundToward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness.
Wheeler, M. A., Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.331 · Cited by 1,751 · cited 2×
“This idea is supported by evidence that PFC lesions disrupt recall more than recognition (for reviews, see Wheeler et al., 1995, 1997; but see Kopelman and Stanhope, 1998; Kopelman et al., 2007), and damage to the PFC is associated with more pronounced deficits in tests of source memory than tests…”
BackgroundDifferential Effects of Early Hippocampal Pathology on Episodic and Semantic Memory
Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W., & Mishkin, M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.376 · Cited by 1,746 · cited 2×
“In studies of patients with relatively selective hippocampal damage, recall is often found to be disrupted to a greater extent than recognition (Vargha-Khadem et al., 1997; Holdstock et al., 2000; Baddeley et al., 2001; Mayes et al., 2001; Bastin et al., 2004; Holdstock et al., 2008; Adlam et al.,…”
BackgroundRecognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?
Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. P. (2001) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35049064 · Cited by 1,624 · cited 1×
“Evidence from a broad range of paradigms has provided support for these claims (for earlier reviews, see Aggleton and Brown, 1999, 2001; Yonelinas, 2002; Eichenbaum et al., 2007).”
BackgroundYonelinas, A., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I., Lazzara, M. M., & Knight, R. T. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99352031 · Cited by 1,419
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
11 of the 156 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1017/S0140525X99002034 · DOI · Paper page
- Atkinson RC, 1974, Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, 239
- 10.1101/lm.251906 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.181 · DOI
- Egan JP, 1958, Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. USAF Tech Note. No. 58–51, 32
- 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.701 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02324.x · DOI
- Milner B, 1985, Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory, Hum Neurobiol, 4, 137
- 10.1037/0735-7044.111.4.667 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.588 · DOI
- 10.1037/0894-4105.11.3.331 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1499 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2877-06.2006 · DOI
- 10.1101/lm.51802 · DOI
- Swets JA, 1964, Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers: Contemporary Readings, 702
- Wolk DA, A medial temporal lobe division of labor: Insights from memory in aging and early Alzheimer's disease, Hippocampus
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 · Cited by 2,783
Pattern separation in the hippocampus
Yassa, M. A., & Stark, C. E. L. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006 · Cited by 1,544
Yushkevich, P. A., Pluta, J. B., Wang, H., Xie, L., Ding, S., Gertje, E. C., Mancuso, L., Kliot, D., Das, S. R., & Wolk, D. A. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22627 · Cited by 587
“…the cortical medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions appear to support episodic memory function in conjunction with the hippocampus, a number of memory models suggest dissociable representations and processes linked to these subregions [Norman, 2010; Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Yonelinas et al., 2010].”
BackgroundStark, S. M., Yassa, M. A., Lacy, J. W., & Stark, C. E. L. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.014 · Cited by 586
Yonelinas, A. P. (2013) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.030 · Cited by 362
Self-citationThe slow forgetting of emotional episodic memories: an emotional binding account
Yonelinas, A. P., & Ritchey, M. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.009 · Cited by 341
Self-citationDistributed Representations in Memory: Insights from Functional Brain Imaging
Rissman, J., & Wagner, A. D. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100344 · Cited by 299
“…details is not sufficient to produce the subjective experience of recollection, which could have important implications for psychological and neural theories of recognition memory (Eichenbaum et al. 2007, Mayes et al. 2007, Wixted & Mickes 2010, Wixted & Squire 2011, Yonelinas et al. 2010).”
BackgroundThe Declarative/Procedural Model
Ullman, M. T. (2016) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6 · Cited by 294
Plancher, G., Tirard, A., Gyselinck, V., Nicolas, S., & Piolino, P. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.013 · Cited by 280
Complementary learning systems
O’Reilly, R. C., Bhattacharyya, R., Howard, M. D., & Ketz, N. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01214.x · Cited by 259
Koen, J. D., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2014) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9266-5 · Cited by 312
“…neuroimaging and animal studies has indicated that within the MTL, the hippocampus is critical for recollection, whereas the surrounding perirhinal cortex is critical for familiarity (for reviews see Diana et al. 2007; Eichenbaum et al. 2007; Yonelinas et al. 2010; but see Squire et al. 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe hippocampus and visual perception
Lee, A. C. H., Yeung, L., & Barense, M. D. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00091 · Cited by 268
“REVIEW ARTICLE published: 177 April 2012 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00091”
BackgroundInfluentialPredictive, interactive multiple memory systems
Henson, R. N., & Gagnepain, P. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20857 · Cited by 240
“In one popular model (see Yonelinas et al., 2010), recollection and familiarity are assumed to be independent.”
BackgroundNeurocognitive Aging and the Hippocampus across Species
Leal, S. L., & Yassa, M. A. (2015) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.10.003 · Cited by 221
Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations
Aly, M., & Turk‐Browne, N. B. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518931113 · Cited by 210
Self-citationMedial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength
Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21335 · Cited by 191
Self-citationMechanisms for widespread hippocampal involvement in cognition.
Shohamy, D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0034461 · Cited by 187
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0205-5 · Cited by 172
“Although the ROC method has been quite fruitful, it does have important limitations (for reviews, see Yonelinas et al., 2010; Yonelinas & Parks, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMeasuring recollection and familiarity: Improving the remember/know procedure
Migo, E. M., Mayes, A. R., & Montaldi, D. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.014 · Cited by 157
Linde-Domingo, J., Treder, M. S., Kerrén, C., & Wimber, M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08080-2 · Cited by 152
Addante, R. J., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.031 · Cited by 148
Self-citationItem memory, context memory and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence
Rugg, M. D., Vilberg, K. L., Mattson, J. T., Yu, S. S., Johnson, J. D., & Suzuki, M. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.004 · Cited by 161
Effect of General Anesthesia in Infancy on Long-Term Recognition Memory in Humans and Rats
Stratmann, G., Lee, J. K., Sall, J. W., Lee, B. H., Alvi, R. S., Shih, J., Rowe, A. M., Ramage, T. M., Chang, F. L., Alexander, T. G., et al. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.134 · Cited by 155
Self-citationDetecting Changes in Scenes: The Hippocampus Is Critical for Strength-Based Perception
Aly, M., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.018 · Cited by 124
“In typical recognition memory studies, many patients with hippocampal damage show severe recollection impairments and intact familiarity (Yonelinas et al., 2002; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIn Search of Recollection and Familiarity Signals in the Hippocampus
Wais, P. E., Squire, L. R., & Wixted, J. T. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21190 · Cited by 103
Lyon, L., Saksida, L. M., & Bussey, T. J. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2536-5 · Cited by 107
The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400
Bridger, E. K., Bader, R., Kriukova, O., Unger, K., & Mecklinger, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.047 · Cited by 129
“Two old/new effects have garnered particular attention because they consistently behave in a way that converges with dual-process models of recognition memory, which state that recognition judgments can be supported by two independent processes: familiarity, a strength-like indicator of previous occurrence and recolle…”
Vasopressin, oxytocin, and social odor recognition
Wacker, D. W., & Ludwig, M. (2012) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.08.014 · Cited by 112
The importance of unitization for familiarity-based learning.
Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000068 · Cited by 114
“…with results from other methods that do not rely on ROCs such as the process dissociation, remember/know, structural equation and second-choice paradigms (for reviews see Yonelinas & Parks, 2007; Yonelinas, 2002; Yonelinas et al, 2010; but also see Wixted, 2007; and Parks &Yonelinas, 2007).”
Self-citationEpisodic memory in aspects of large-scale brain networks
Jeong, W., Chung, C. K., & Kim, J. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00454 · Cited by 130
“On the one hand, studies have suggested that recollection is related to the hippocampus, while familiarity is related to the adjacent MTL regions (Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Squire et al., 2007; Montaldi and Mayes, 2010; Wixted and Squire, 2010; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultVisual recognition memory is impaired in rhesus monkeys repeatedly exposed to sevoflurane in infancy
Alvarado, M. C., Murphy, K. L., & Baxter, M. G. (2017) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aew473 · Cited by 110
“Accurately reporting that an object has been seen before (recognition memory) may be supported by recollection of the specific prior event, or by a general feeling of familiarity for the object.(32) The recollective aspect of recognition memory has been linked to hippocampal function.”
BackgroundHow Hippocampal Memory Shapes, and Is Shaped by, Attention
Aly, M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2017) · The Hippocampus from Cells to Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_12 · Cited by 97
“These different types of memory differentially tax hippocampal processing: recollection, but not familiarity, is critically dependent on the hippocampus (for review, see Yonelinas et al. 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKoen, J. D., Barrett, F. S., Harlow, I. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0796-z · Cited by 106
Self-citationAsymmetric effects of emotion on mnemonic interference
Leal, S. L., Tighe, S. K., & Yassa, M. A. (2014) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2014.02.013 · Cited by 95
Associative recognition processes are modulated by the semantic unitizability of memoranda.
Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Scheuplein, A.-L., Mecklinger, A., & Levy, D. A. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.09.009 · Cited by 92
“…2008; Tibon & Levy, 2014a, 2014b; Tibon, Ben-Zvi, & Levy, 2014; Yonelinas, Kroll, Dobbins, & Soltani, 1999; for review, see Mecklinger & Jäger, 2009; Yonelinas et al., 2010).1 Arguably, in such cases familiarity can contribute to associative recognition due to direct links between the components…”
BackgroundDistinct hippocampal functional networks revealed by tractography-based parcellation
Adnan, A., Barnett, A. J., Moayedi, M., McCormick, C., Cohn, M., & McAndrews, M. P. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1084-x · Cited by 94
Network oscillations modulate interictal epileptiform spike rate during human memory
Matsumoto, J. Y., Stead, M., Kucewicz, M. T., Matsumoto, A. J., Peters, P. A., Brinkmann, B. H., Danstrom, J. C., Goerss, S. J., Marsh, W. R., Meyer, F. B., et al. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt159 · Cited by 84
“The recognition judgement likely invokes familiarity memory that uses the perirhinal cortex (Diana et al., 2007; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundVisual memory, the long and the short of it: A review of visual working memory and long-term memory
Schurgin, M. W. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1522-y · Cited by 131
“Data were analyzed using the same method as Zhang and Luck (2008) to estimate the quantity (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDistributed Patterns of Reactivation Predict Vividness of Recollection
St‐Laurent, M., Abdi, H., & Buchsbaum, B. R. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00839 · Cited by 95
Bein, O., Livneh, N., Reggev, N., Gilead, M., Goshen‐Gottstein, Y., & Maril, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115624 · Cited by 100
“The finding whereby participants did not report any erroneous context-words also pertains to the ongoing debate as to whether source memory judgments (and Remember responses) reflect episodic recollection, or whether they stem from some sort of familiarity judgment [33,34,50].”
BackgroundDistinguishing between the success and precision of recollection
Harlow, I. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.988162 · Cited by 82
Self-citationDirect Evidence for Domain-Sensitive Functional Subregions in Human Entorhinal Cortex
Schultz, H., Sommer, T., & Peters, J. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5126-11.2012 · Cited by 73
“Functional MTL accounts have prominently focused on psychologically distinct processes underlying recognition memory, i.e., recollection and familiarity: PRC is thought to support familiarity and a PHC–HC network is thought to sup- port recollection (Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe perceptual richness of complex memory episodes is compromised by medial temporal lobe damage
St‐Laurent, M., Moscovitch, M., Jadd, R., & McAndrews, M. P. (2014) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22249 · Cited by 85
“, 1997; Tulving, 2002), and it is well established that the experience of recollection is a determinant of hippocampal engagement during episodic memory retrieval, whether the episode is recent or remote (Nadel and Moscovitch, 1997; Moscovitch and Nadel, 1998; Moscovitch et al., 2005; Aggleton and Brown, 2006; Eichenb…”
BackgroundAssessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task
Kim, J., & Yassa, M. A. (2013) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22087 · Cited by 73
“Both Yonelinas et al. (2010) and Norman (2010) discuss situations where similarity is so high that pattern separation fails.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBayer, J., Gläscher, J. P., Finsterbusch, J., Schulte, L. H., & Sommer, T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03679-x · Cited by 86
Wang, T. H., Johnson, J. D., de Chastelaine, M., Donley, B. E., & Rugg, M. D. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu333 · Cited by 74
“The findings are incompatible, however, with the commonly held assumption that, unlike the signal supporting familiarity, the signal supporting recollection is thresholded (cf. Wixted et al. 2010 and Yonelinas et al. 2010).”
Bein, O., Reggev, N., & Maril, A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.046 · Cited by 75
“…pilot study, we asked subjects to press “associative memory” if they had any recollection of the encoding event, including the context word (footnote continued) (similar to the “remember” response option in the “remember-know” task; Tulving, 1989; Yonelinas et al., 2010; Yonelinas et al., 1998).”
MethodInfluentialGeneration and the subjective feeling of “aha!” are independently related to learning from insight
Kizilirmak, J. M., da Silva, J. G. G., Imamoglu, F., & Richardson‐Klavehn, A. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0697-2 · Cited by 96
Pergola, G., Ranft, A., Mathias, K., & Boris Suchan, A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.017 · Cited by 81
“The trials in which no subsequent recall occurred are not process-pure familiarity occurrences, because recall of details associated with the recognition cue, but not diagnostic of the unique paired associate, may have occurred (non-criterial recollection; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSource accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory
Harlow, I., & Donaldson, D. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0340-9 · Cited by 70
Zhang, J., Andreano, J. M., Dickerson, B. C., Touroutoglou, A., & Barrett, L. F. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz071 · Cited by 81
“recollection-based memory processes (Yonelinas 1994; Wixted 2007; Yonelinas et al. 2010; Wolk and Dickerson 2011), as well as controlled search/retrieval processes.”
Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: An examination of individual differences
Wang, W., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0298-7 · Cited by 61
“In contrast, we do not expect to see a strong relationship between implicit memory and recognition responses that were based on recollection, because recollection is generally associated with processes supported by the hippocampus rather than the perirhinal cortex (for reviews, see Diana et al., 2007; Eichenbaum et al…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationAssociative Learning Beyond the Medial Temporal Lobe: Many Actors on the Memory Stage
Pergola, G., & Boris Suchan, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00162 · Cited by 70
“Yonelinas et al. (2010), for instance, highlighted the role of the PFC in recognition memory, concluding that the extant evidence favors a prefrontal contribution to recollection, in particular during encoding.”
BackgroundJacobs, H. I. L., Priovoulos, N., Poser, B. A., Pagen, L. H. G., Ivanov, D., Verhey, F. R. J., & Uludaǧ, K. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52059 · Cited by 86
Pergola, G., Güntürkün, O., Koch, B., Schwarz, M., Daum, I., & Boris Suchan, A. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.019 · Cited by 76
Getting to Know Someone: Familiarity, Person Recognition, and Identification in the Human Brain
Kovács, G. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01627 · Cited by 76
Giraudier, M., Ventura‐Bort, C., & Weymar, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01276 · Cited by 78
“For instance, patients with selective hippocampal damage exhibit more pronounced deficits on tasks related to recollection processes, such as associative and source memory tasks (Holdstock et al., 2005; Gold et al., 2006; for a review see Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundAddante, R. J., Ranganath, C., Olichney, J., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.038 · Cited by 66
Self-citationTroyer, A., Murphy, K., Anderson, N., Craik, F., Moscovitch, M., Maione, A. M., & Gao, F. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.018 · Cited by 63
The medial temporal lobe: Memory and beyond
Lech, R. K., & Boris Suchan, A. (2013) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.009 · Cited by 69
Kriukova, O., Bridger, E. K., & Mecklinger, A. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.006 · Cited by 63
From fluency to recognition decisions: A broader view of familiarity-based remembering
Mecklinger, A., & Bader, R. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107527 · Cited by 62
Distinct roles of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in spatial and object recognition memory
Okada, K., Nishizawa, K., Kobayashi, T., Sakata, S., & Kobayashi, K. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13158 · Cited by 59
Aly, M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030231 · Cited by 58
Self-citationMore ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect.
Bridger, E. K., Bader, R., & Mecklinger, A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.007 · Cited by 56
Hayes, S. M., Buchler, N., Stokes, J. D., Kragel, J. E., & Cabeza, R. E. L. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00086 · Cited by 59
“$w aterm ark-text $w aterm ark-text $w aterm ark-text (Yonelinas et al., 2010), which makes the VPC pattern of activation difficult to attribute to recollection processes alone.”
InfluentialLy, M., Murray, E. A., & Yassa, M. (2013) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22110 · Cited by 55
“It is precisely this item-specific recollection that is also sensitive to pattern separation deficits (Norman, 2010; Yonelinas et al., 2010), thus the perceptual condition may be more sensitive to such deficits than the conceptual condition.”
BackgroundWatanabe, T., Shiino, A., & Akiguchi, I. (2012) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2012.01.006 · Cited by 45
Nishio, Y., Hashimoto, M., Ishii, K., Ito, D., Mugikura, S., Takahashi, S., & Mori, E. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.025 · Cited by 58
Exploring the neurocognitive basis of episodic recollection in autism
Cooper, R. A., & Simons, J. S. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1504-z · Cited by 56
“(Yonelinas et al., 2010), recollection involves controlled search for and evaluation of contextual details (Yonelinas, 2002) and is a threshold “some-or-none” process, where either some qualitative information about an event is recollected, with varying degree of specificity (Murray et al.”
BackgroundRecognizing what matters: Value improves recognition by selectively enhancing recollection
Hennessee, J. P., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.004 · Cited by 54
Genon, S., Bahri, M. A., Collette, F., Angel, L., D’Argembeau, A., Clarys, D., Kalenzaga, S., Salmon, É., & Bastin, C. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.009 · Cited by 60
“…episodic retrieval of information together with the context and elaborations from encoding (Tulving, 2002) rather than familiarity (i.e. a relatively automatic process of global assessment of memory strength or stimulus fluency (for reviews, see Yonelinas, 2002 and Yonelinas et al., 2010)).”
BackgroundClément, F., & Belleville, S. (2012) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2012-110426 · Cited by 54
“Recollection refers to the retrieval of qualitative information about a specific study episode [15].”
BackgroundDynamic internal states shape memory retrieval.
Tarder-Stoll, H., Jayakumar, M., Dimsdale-Zucker, H., Günseli, E., & Aly, M. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kudj3 · Cited by 53
“something has been experienced before, despite an inability to bring to mind qualitative details about the prior event (Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
Self-citationMartin, C. B., Mirsattari, S. M., Pruessner, J. C., Pietrantonio, S., Burneo, J. G., Hayman-Abello, B. A., & Köhler, S. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.030 · Cited by 59
“Together, the case of NB and the data from the present TLEþ patients support the influential but still contentious notion that processes of item-based familiarity assessment can be dissociated from recollection at the level of MTL functioning (Aggleton & Brown, 1999; Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Montaldi & Mayes, 2010; Yo…”
BackgroundDamage to the lateral prefrontal cortex impairs familiarity but not recollection
Aly, M., Yonelinas, A. P., Kishiyama, M. M., & Knight, R. T. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.043 · Cited by 49
Self-citationThe Perirhinal Cortex and Recognition Memory Interference
Watson, H. C., & Lee, A. C. H. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2075-12.2013 · Cited by 47
“…from differing (but not necessarily contradictory) perspectives, including the types of mnemonic processes [e.g., familiarity: Brown et al. (2010), Yonelinas et al. (2010)], computational operations [e.g., pattern generalization: Norman (2010)], and/or representational content [e.g.,…”
BackgroundKoen, J. D., Borders, A. A., Petzold, M. T., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22682 · Cited by 56
“gyrus, plays a critical role in episodic long-term memory (Squire and Zola-Morgan, 1991; Aggleton and Brown, 2006; Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Yonelinas et al., 2010), but whether the MTL is necessary for short-term memory is controversial.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPitarque, A., Mélendez, J., Sales, A., Mayordomo, T., Satorres, E., Escudero, J., & Algarabel, S. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.010 · Cited by 46
Effects of aging on mnemonic discrimination of emotional information.
Leal, S. L., & Yassa, M. A. (2014) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000011 · Cited by 41
Fast and Famous: Looking for the Fastest Speed at Which a Face Can be Recognized
Barragan‐Jason, G., Besson, G., Ceccaldi, M. P., & Barbeau, E. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00100 · Cited by 44
“Recognition memory has been largely described as being supported by two processes, familiarity and recollection (Mandler, 1980; Yonelinas and Levy, 2002; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundEnhancing memory with stress: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
Goldfarb, E. V. (2018) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.11.009 · Cited by 53
Nilakantan, A. S., Bridge, D. J., VanHaerents, S. A., & Voss, J. L. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.035 · Cited by 53
“This is often contrasted with familiarity-based recognition, in which memory for single items can vary in strength without specific recall of event associative information (Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
Separating Event-related Potential Effects for Conceptual Fluency and Episodic Familiarity
Bader, R., & Mecklinger, A. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01131 · Cited by 39
Memory Retrieval in Mice and MenPreprint
Ben-Yakov, A., Dudai, Y., & Mayford, M. R. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021790 · Cited by 54
“, remember/know test [Tulving 1985]) indeed dissociate these two processes (e.g., Perfect 1996; Yonelinas 2002; Parks and Yonelinas 2007; Yonelinas et al. 2010), or whether they in fact only separate strong memories from weaker ones (Donaldson 1996; Dunn Memory Retrieval in Mice and Men”
Murray, J. G., Howie, C. A., & Donaldson, D. I. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.069 · Cited by 43
“…versus continuous accounts of recollection have been extensively debated within the behavioral literature (Slotnick, 2013; Mickes et al., 2009; Yonelinas et al., 2010), to date relatively little progress has been made in characterizing the mechanism supporting recollection at a neural level…”
BackgroundInfluentialPhysiological impact of CB1 receptor expression by hippocampal GABAergic interneurons
Albayram, Ö., Passlick, S., Bilkei-Gorzo, A., Zimmer, A., & Steinhäuser, C. (2016) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00424-015-1782-5 · Cited by 42
Variations in recollection: The effects of complexity on source recognition
Parks, C., Murray, L. J., Elfman, K. W., & Yonelinas, A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0022798 · Cited by 41
Self-citationMapping Dynamic Interactions Among Cognitive Biases in Depression
Everaert, J., Bernstein, A., Joormann, J., & Koster, E. H. W. (2020) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073919892069 · Cited by 45
Working Memory Load Attenuates Emotional Enhancement in Recognition Memory
Miendlarzewska, E. A., van Elswijk, G., Cannistraci, C., & van Ee, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00112 · Cited by 40
“In addition, methodological considerations suggest that the modeling of the underlying processes of recollection and familiarity is not yet clear (e.g., the singlevs. dual-process hypothesis, Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundNap sleep preserves associative but not item memory performance
Studte, S., Bridger, E. K., & Mecklinger, A. (2015) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.012 · Cited by 52
“One kind of memory task which is thought to make familiaritybased decisions insufficient to support correct responding are associative tests (Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
InfluentialMusical familiarity in congenital amusia: evidence from a gating paradigm.
Tillmann, B., Albouy, P., Caclin, A., & Bigand, E. (2014) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.012 · Cited by 39
Neural correlates of the Dunning–Kruger effect
Muller, A., Sirianni, L. A., & Addante, R. J. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14935 · Cited by 60
Yang, J., Niu, Y., Simon, C., Seritan, A. L., Chen, L., Schneider, A., Moghaddam, S. T., Hagerman, P. J., Hagerman, R. J., & Olichney, J. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.122 · Cited by 42
“Consistent with the familiarity/recollection model of recognition memory (Yonelinas et al, 2010), two ERP components have been linked to different aspects of recognition processes: the frontal N400 (FN400) reflecting familiarity and the late positive component (LPC) indexing recollection (Yu and…”
Bader, R., Opitz, B., Reith, W., & Mecklinger, A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.006 · Cited by 36
“As Yonelinas et al. (2010) noticed, unitization is rather a continuum than a dichotomy coming along with different forms and various ways of creating unitized associations.”
Mecklinger, A., & Kamp, S.-M. (2023) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105347 · Cited by 37
Glucocorticoids, metabolism and brain activity
Jaszczyk, A., & Juszczak, G. R. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.007 · Cited by 45
The impact of aging on associative memory for preexisting unitized associations
Delhaye, E., & Bastin, C. (2018) · Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2016.1263725 · Cited by 37
“…pairs may have been directly associated, allowing for familiarity-based associative memory The second exception suggests that new associations can be recognized on the basis of familiarity, if they were unitized at encoding (Quamme et al., 2007; Yonelinas, 2002; Yonelinas, Aly, Wang, & Koen, 2010).”
Age effects on associative memory for novel picture pairings
Bridger, E. K., Kursawe, A.-L., Bader, R., Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Levy, D. A., & Mecklinger, A. (2017) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.031 · Cited by 40
“According to dual process models of recognition memory, recognition memory can be supported by two functionally distinct processes (Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
Elfman, K. W., Aly, M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2014) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22345 · Cited by 35
“Hippocampus critical for recollection (Schacter et al., 1996; Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Eldridge et al., 2000; Yonelinas, 2002; Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Yonelinas et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W., & Koen, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yonelinas, Andrew P.
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1178-1194
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- PMC
- PMC4251874
- OpenAlex
- W2038244455
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 156
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH59325, R01MH059352)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- recollection, familiarity, recognition memory, memory retrieval, neural substrates of memory, boundary conditions, medial temporal lobe, novelty detection, implicit memory, short-term memory, computational model of memory
- MeSH terms
- Amnesia, Animals, Association Learning, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Psychological, Mental Recall, ROC Curve, Signal Detection, Psychological, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review