Cited by 294Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The Declarative/Procedural Model

Ullman, Michael T.·2016·Neurobiology of Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ullman, M. T.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Ullman, Michael T.
Venue
Neurobiology of Language
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2016
Pages
953-968
OpenAlex
W2755010344
Cited by
294
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
35.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
declarative memory, procedural memory, language learning, language use, memory systems, language evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review