Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,064

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales—21 (DASS‐21): Further Examination of Dimensions, Scale Reliability, and Correlates

Osman, Augustine, Wong, Jane L., Bagge, Courtney L., Freedenthal, Stacey, Gutierrez, Peter M., Lozano, Gregorio·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1002/jclp.21908
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted two studies to examine the dimensions, internal consistency reliability estimates, and potential correlates of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales—21 (DASS‐21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995). Method: Participants in Study 1 included 887 undergraduate students (363 men and 524 women, aged 18 to 35 years; mean [M] age = 19.46, standard deviation [SD] = 2.17) recruited from two public universities to assess the specificity of the individual DASS‐21 items and to evaluate estimates of internal consistency reliability. Participants in a follow‐up study (Study 2) included 410 students (168 men and 242 women, aged 18 to 47 years; M age = 19.65, SD = 2.88) recruited from the same universities to further assess factorial validity and to evaluate potential correlates of the original DASS‐21 total and scale scores. Results: Item bifactor and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a general factor accounted for the greatest proportion of common variance in the DASS‐21 item scores (Study 1). In Study 2, the fit statistics showed good fit for the bifactor model. In addition, the DASS‐21 total scale score correlated more highly with scores on a measure of mixed depression and anxiety than with scores on the proposed specific scales of depression or anxiety. Coefficient omega estimates for the DASS‐21 scale scores were good. Conclusions: Further investigations of the bifactor structure and psychometric properties of the DASS‐21, specifically its incremental and discriminant validity, using known clinical groups are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.21908

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02731.x · DOI
  2. Beck A. T., 1990, Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory
  3. Beck A. T., 1996, Manual for the revised Beck Depression Inventory‐II
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/a0019187 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF02293801 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brown T. A., 2006, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
  8. Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 136
  9. Cai L., 2012, IRTPRO 2.1: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]
  10. 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Clark L. A., 1990, Advances in mood disorders, Vol. I. Psychosocial aspects of depression
  12. 10.1007/s11136-009-9464-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.013 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gutierrez P. M., 2008, Adolescent suicide: An integrated approach to the assessment of risk and protective factors
  17. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238 · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238 · Paper page
  18. 10.2466/pr0.100.1.76-82 · doi:10.2466/pr0.100.1.76-82
  19. 10.1207/S15327752JPA740108 · DOI
  20. 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.2.157 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90115-J · DOI
  22. 10.1037/a0021400 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.1000 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.185 · DOI
  25. McDonald R. P., 1999, Test theory: A unified treatment
  26. Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus 6.1 [Computer software]
  27. 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00217.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.120 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/1073191108324440 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80041-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.3102/10769986004003207 · doi:10.3102/10769986004003207 · Paper page
  32. 10.1177/014662169001400105 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0021-843X.99.3.308 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Satorra A., 1994, Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research, 399
  35. 10.1023/A:1021887712873 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02019.x · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/da.20432 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300 · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300 · Paper page
  40. 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/da.20002 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04948.x · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00182-X · DOI
  44. 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.15 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.22237/jmasm/1177992180 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Osman, A., Wong, J. L., Bagge, C. L., Freedenthal, S., Gutierrez, P. M., & Lozano, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-28
Volume
68
Issue
12
Pages
1322-1338
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
DOI
10.1002/jclp.21908
OpenAlex
W1526898363
Cited by
1,064
References
28
FWCI
23.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.