Cited by 140Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self‐Compassion Online: A Pilot Study of an Internet‐Based Self‐Compassion Cultivation Program for Psychology Trainees

Finlay‐Jones, Amy, Kane, Robert, Rees, Clare·2017·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective: The current study sought to conduct a preliminary investigation of the effectiveness and feasibility of a novel, self‐guided online self‐compassion training for reducing psychological distress and increasing self‐compassion and happiness among psychology trainees. Method: A 6‐week online self‐compassion cultivation program was developed and delivered to Australian psychology trainees (n = 37), and a pre‐experimental repeated‐measures design was used to collect change data on self‐compassion, happiness, perceived stress, emotion regulation difficulties as well as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Results: Participants reported significant increases in self‐compassion and happiness and significant decreases in depression, stress, and emotion regulation difficulties between pretest and posttest, with the majority of changes maintained at 3‐month follow up. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the effectiveness and acceptability of online self‐compassion training as a positive, integrated, and meaningful way of reducing distress and promoting self‐compassion and happiness among trainee psychologists.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.22375

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Gilbert P., 2010, The compassionate mind
  3. Neff K. D., 2009, Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp, 561
  4. Neff K. D., 2011, Self‐compassion: Stop beating yourself up and leave insecurity behind
  5. Neff K. D., 2014, Self‐compassion, wellbeing, and happiness, Psychologie in Österreich, 2, 114
  6. Roemer L., 2009, Mindfulness & acceptance‐based behavioral therapies in practice

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 140

Metadata

Authors
Finlay‐Jones, A., Kane, R., & Rees, C.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Finlay‐Jones, Amy
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-27
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
797-816
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2542835748
Cited by
139
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-compassion, online intervention, trainee psychologists, psychological distress, happiness, depression, anxiety, stress, emotion regulation, self-guided training, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Empathy, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Pilot Projects, Psychology, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Students, Health Occupations, Internet, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review