Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal extracellular microRNAs miR‐124 and miR‐9 mediate cell–cell communication between neurons and microglia

Veremeyko, Tatyana, Kuznetsova, Inna S., Dukhinova, Marina, W. Y. Yung, Amanda, Kopeikina, Ekaterina, Barteneva, Natasha S., Ponomarev, Eugene D.·2019·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

In contrast to peripheral macrophages, microglia in the central nervous system (CNS) exhibit a specific deactivated phenotype; however, it is not clear how this phenotype is maintained. Two alternative hypotheses were postulated recently: (a) microglia differ from peripheral macrophages being derived from the yolk sac (YS), whereas peripheral macrophages originate from bone marrow (BM); (b) microglia acquire a specific phenotype under the influence of the CNS microenvironment. We have previously shown that microglia express miR‐124, which was also induced in BM‐derived macrophages co‐cultured with a neurons. We here investigated the possibility of horizontal transfer of the neuron‐specific microRNAs miR‐124 and miR‐9 from primary neurons to microglia/macrophages. We found that after incubation with neuronal conditioned media (NCM), macrophages downregulated activation markers MHC class II and CD45. Neither cultured adult microglia nor YS‐ and BM‐derived macrophages demonstrated intrinsic levels of miR‐124 expression. However, after incubation with NCM, miR‐124 was induced in both YS‐ and BM‐derived macrophages. Biochemical analysis demonstrated that the NCM contained miR‐124 and miR‐9 in complex with small proteins, large high‐density lipoproteins (HDLs), and exosomes. MiR‐124 and miR‐9 were promptly released from neurons, and this process was inhibited by tetrodotoxin, indicating an important role of neuronal electric activity in secretion of these microRNAs. Incubation of macrophages with exogenous miR‐124 resulted in efficient translocation of miR‐124 into the cytoplasm. This study demonstrates an important role of neuronal miRNAs in communication of neurons with microglia, which favors the hypothesis that microglia acquire a specific phenotype under the influence of the CNS microenvironment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.24344

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.06.005 · DOI
  2. 10.1186/1471-2121-14-23 · DOI
  3. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00145 · DOI
  4. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00220 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-06-02215.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5_10 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.M111.318865 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.coph.2008.07.009 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.097 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64030-8 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.04.036 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/gkl220 · DOI
  13. 10.3389/fnsyn.2014.00005 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10649 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5_9 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.05.020 · DOI
  17. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0441 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00248-X · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300068 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.014 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.01.011 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.007 · DOI
  23. 10.3389/fendo.2017.00355 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nprot.2010.62 · DOI
  25. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00406 · DOI
  26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1922-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jim.2005.02.011 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/jnr.20488 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0165-2478(00)00256-X · DOI
  30. 10.1186/1756-0500-4-517 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/glia.22363 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.4137/JEN.S32843 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/jnen/nlv016 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00566 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1261/rna.1286409 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.als.2016.11.007 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0058979 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096256 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.031 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03881.x · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkr254 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081774 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Veremeyko T., 2012, Detection of microRNAs in microglia by real‐time PCR in normal CNS and during neuroinflammation, Journal of Visualized Experiments, 65, e4097
  45. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00050 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/ncb2210 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/nar/gkq601 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/hmg/ddt164 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.02.001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Veremeyko, T., Kuznetsova, I. S., Dukhinova, M., W. Y. Yung, A., Kopeikina, E., Barteneva, N. S., & Ponomarev, E. D.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-27
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
162-184
ISSN
  • 0360-4012
  • 1097-4547
Cited by
52
References
5
Language
en
Funders
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (24100314)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review