Cited by 119Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and Cortisol

Microglia: A Central Player in Depression

Open access
Deng, Si-long, Chen, Jian-guo, Wang, Fang·2020·Current Medical Science

Abstract

Summary: Microglia are the major immune cells in the central nervous system and play a key role in the normal function of the brain. Microglia exhibit functional diversity, and they control the inflammation in central nervous system through releasing inflammatory cytokine, clearing apoptotic cells via phagocytosis, regulating synaptic plasticity and the formation of neural network by synapse pruning. Recent studies have strongly indicated that the microglial dysfunction is associated with a variety of neuropsychiatric diseases such as depression, which have been termed as “microgliopathy”. The emergency of advanced technologies and tools has enabled us to comprehensively understand the role of microglia in physiology and pathology, and growing studies have targetted microglia to explore the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases. Here, we describe the key progress of microglia research, and review the recent developments in the understanding of the role of microglia in physiology and etiology of depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11596-020-2193-1

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tremblay ME, Stevens B, Sierra A, et al. The role of microglia in the healthy brain. J Neurosci, 2011,31(45): 16 064-16 069

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, S.-L., Chen, J.-G., & Wang, F.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Fang
Venue
Current Medical Science
Published
2020-06
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
391-400
ISSN
  • 2096-5230 (ISSN-L)
  • 2523-899X
OpenAlex
W3042758594
Cited by
119
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81721005)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
microglia, depression, neuroinflammation, inflammatory cytokines, phagocytosis, synaptic pruning, synaptic plasticity, neuropsychiatric disorders, microglial dysfunction, etiology of depression, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Depression, Humans, Inflammation, Neuronal Plasticity, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review