Cited by 169Survey Methodology and NonresponseMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Improving accuracy of major depression age‐of‐onset reports in the US National Comorbidity Survey

Open access
Knäuper, Bärbel, Cannell, Charles F., Schwarz, Norbert, Bruce, Martha L., Kessler, Ronald C.·1999·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

This paper describes a series of questions designed to improve the accuracy of age‐of‐onset reports in the US National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) and empirically evaluates the impact of these questions on reports about age of onset of major depressive episodes. The logic underlying the series of question is traced to cognitive psychological research on autobiographical memory. Data are presented showing that the new question series yielded more substantively plausible age‐of‐onset reports than those obtained a decade earlier in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. The test–retest consistency of age‐of‐onset reports was also higher in the NCS than the ECA. Despite these improvements, considerable inconsistency in age‐of‐onset reports remains in the NCS test‐retest data. The paper closes with a discussion of potentially promising future directions to improve retrospective age‐of‐onset reports in new psychiatric epidemiological surveys. Copyright © 1999 Whurr Publishers, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.55

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrospective reports were used to date age-of-onset of each lifetime disorder using probing methods that have been shown experimentally to improve accuracy of recall.

    “Retrospective reports were used to date age-of-onset of each lifetime disorder using probing methods that have been shown experimentally to improve accuracy of recall (Knäuper et al. 1999).”

    From The descriptive epidemiology of DSM-IV adult ADHD in the world health organization world mental health surveys (2017) · cites this paper as Knäuper et al. 1999

    The Current Approach describes revised NCS questions that prompted a more thorough memory search, and the Methods and Procedures evaluates their use for major depression. The Discussion says indirect indicators suggest improvement, but the absence of a gold standard prevents a direct measure of accuracy; it does not establish experimental improvement in recall accuracy for each lifetime disorder. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Belli RF. Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses? Memory and Cognition 1988; 16: 314-26.
  2. Bromet EJ, Dunn LO, Copnell MM, Dew MA, Schulberg HC. Long-term reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry 1986; 43: 435-40.
  3. Brown GW, Harris TO. Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women. New York, NY: Free Press, 1978.
  4. Cannell CF, Oksenberg L, Converse JM. Striving for response accuracy: Experiments in new interviewing tech- niques. Journal of Marketing Research 1977; 14 (3): 306-15.
  5. Clark, HH, Schober, MF. Asking questions and influencing answers. In JM Tanur (ed.) Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. New York: Russell Sage, 1992.
  6. Farrer LA, Florio LP, Bruce ML, Leaf PJ, Weissman MM. Reliability of self-reported age at onset of major depres- sion. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1989; 23: 35-47.
  7. Fombonne E. Increased rates of depression: update of epi- demiological findings and analytical problems. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1994; 90: 145-56.
  8. Friedman WJ. Memory for the time of past events. Psychological Bulletin 1993; 113-18(1): 44-66.
  9. Huttenlocher J, Hedges L, Prohaska V. Hierarchical organi- zation in ordered domains: estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review 1988; 95(4): 471-84.
  10. Jabine TB, Straf ML, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1984.
  11. Jobe JB, Mingay, DJ. Cognition and survey measurement: history and overview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991; 5: 175-92.
  12. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, Wittchen H-U, Kendler KS. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8-19.
  13. Kessler RC, Wethington E. The reliability of life event reports in a community survey. Psychological Medicine 1991; 21: 723-38.
  14. Loftus EF, Marburger W. Since the eruption of Mt St Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Memory and Cognition 1983; 11: 114-20.
  15. Lyketsos CG, Nestadt G, Cwi J, Heithoff K, Eaton WW. The life chart interview: a standardized method to describe the course of psychopathology. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1994; 4: 143-55.
  16. Means B, Loftus EF. When personal history repeats itself: decomposing memories for recurring events. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991; 5: 297-318.
  17. Menon A. Judgments of behavioral frequencies: memory search and retrieval strategies. In N Schwarz, S Sudman (eds) Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
  18. Murphy JM, Sobol AM, Neff RK, Olivier DC, Leighton AH. Stability of prevalence: depression and anxiety disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 1984; 41: 990-7.
  19. Prusoff BA, Merikangas KR, Weissman MM. Lifetime preva- lence and AOO of psychiatric disorders: recall 4 years later. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1988; 22(2): 107-17.
  20. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry 1981; 38: 381-9.
  21. Robins LN, Regier DA. Psychiatric Disorders in America. New York: The Free Press, 1991.
  22. Rubin DC, Baddeley AD. Telescoping is not time compres- sion: a model of the dating of autobiographical events. Memory and Cognition 1989; 17: 653-61.
  23. Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds) Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
  24. Thornton A, Freedman D, Camburn D. Obtaining Respondent Cooperation in Family Panel Studies. Sociological Methods and Research 1982; 11: 33-51.
  25. Wetzler SE, Sweeney JA. Childhood amnesia: an empirical demonstration. In DC Rubin (ed.) Autobiographical Memory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  26. Wittchen H-U, Essau CA, Hecht H, Teder W, Pfister H. Reliability of life event assessments: test-retest reliability and fall-off effects of the Munich Interview for the Assessment of Life. Events and Conditions. Journal of Affective Disorders 1989; 16: 77-91.
  27. Wittchen H-U, Kessler RC, Zhao S, Abelson J. Reliability and clinical validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1995; 29: 95-110.
  28. Wittchen H-U, Zhao S, Abelson JM, Abelson JL, Kessler RC. Reliability and procedural validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R phobic disorders. Psychological Medicine 1996; 26: 1169-77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knäuper, B., Cannell, C. F., Schwarz, N., Bruce, M. L., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
39-48
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2095510225
Cited by
169
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
age of onset, major depressive disorder, retrospective reports, autobiographical memory, questionnaire design, test-retest reliability, National Comorbidity Survey, Epidemiologic Catchment Area study, psychiatric epidemiology, measurement accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review