The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain
Abstract
To assess the effect of stimulus correlated motion on the appearance of functional magnetic resonance images, conventional visual and motor protocols were each performed by four normal volunteers and an image co‐registration technique was used to retrospectively monitor subject motion. In three studies synthetic data sets were constructed from single baseline images using the positional information obtained from the co‐registration procedure. Cumulative difference images were then created from both the synthetic and functional image sets. Stimulus correlated motion was detected in all eight studies and the synthetic cumulative difference images showed striking similarities to the equivalent functional images in each case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation
Bandettini, P. A., Wong, E. C., Hinks, R. S., Tikofsky, R. S., & Hyde, J. S. (1992) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910250220 · Cited by 1,935
Cited by
Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series
Friston, K. J., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350312 · Cited by 3,774
Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044 · Cited by 957
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Breiter, H. C. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830070041008 · Cited by 626
Siegel, J. S., Power, J. D., Dubis, J. W., Vogel, A. C., Church, J. A., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22307 · Cited by 546
Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal
Caballero-Gaudes, C., & Reynolds, R. C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.018 · Cited by 542
Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Progress and challenges
Sulzer, J., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Weiskopf, N., Birbaumer, N., Blefari, M. L., Bruehl, A. B., Cohen, L. G., deCharms, R. C., Gassert, R., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033 · Cited by 453
Dynamics of male sexual arousal: distinct components of brain activation revealed by fMRI
Ferretti, A., Caulo, M., Del Gratta, C., Di Matteo, R., Merla, A., Montorsi, F., Pizzella, V., Pompa, P., Rigatti, P., Rossini, P. M., et al. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.025 · Cited by 288
Alexander-Bloch, A., Clasen, L., Stockman, M., Ronan, L., Lalonde, F., Giedd, J., & Raznahan, A. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23180 · Cited by 178
Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging II. Signal detection and statistical inference
Petersson, K. M., Nichols, T. E., Poline, J.-B., & Holmes, A. P. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0478 · Cited by 186
Magnetic field changes in the human brain due to swallowing or speaking
Birn, R. M., Bandettini, P. A., Cox, R. W., Jesmanowicz, A., & Shaker, R. (1998) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400108 · Cited by 172
Corfield, D. R., Murphy, K., Josephs, O., Fink, G. R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Guz, A., Adams, L., & Turner, R. (1999) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1468 · Cited by 146
Brunetti, M., Sepede, G., Mingoia, G., Catani, C., Ferretti, A., Merla, A., Del Gratta, C., Romani, G. L., & Babiloni, C. (2010) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.024 · Cited by 101
Hocking, J., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21114 · Cited by 87
Hu, J., Small, H., Kean, H., Takahashi, A., Zekelman, L., Kleinman, D., Ryan, E., Nieto-Castañón, A., Ferreira, V., & Fedorenko, E. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac350 · Cited by 73
Imaging the brain during sniffing: a pilot fMRI study
Koritnik, B., Azam, S., Andrew, C. M., Leigh, P. N., & Williams, S. C. R. (2009) · Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2008.10.009 · Cited by 64
Disrupted prefrontal activity during emotion processing in complicated grief: An fMRI investigation
Arizmendi, B., Kaszniak, A. W., & O'Connor, M.-F. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.054 · Cited by 57
Nursing stimulation is more than tactile sensation: It is a multisensory experience
Febo, M., Stolberg, T. L., Numan, M., Bridges, R. S., Kulkarni, P., & Ferris, C. F. (2008) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.02.024 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Hajnal, J. V., Myers, R., Oatridge, A., Schwieso, J. E., Young, I. R., & Bydder, G. M.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-291
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2108117677
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.