The DOI matches its Crossref record; 202 of the 202 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application
Open accessAbstract
In this open access edited volume, international researchers of the field describe and discuss the systematic review method in its application to research in education. Alongside fundamental methodical considerations, reflections and practice examples are included and provide an introduction and overview on systematic reviews in education research.; Open Access With contributions from international experts First volume with a special focus on systematic reviews in educational research Contains practical examples Takes ethical considerations into account.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742 · cited 1×
“This term is also used by others (for example, Arksey and O’Malley 2005) to denote ‘systematic maps’ that describe the nature of a research field rather than synthesise findings.”
MethodRayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787 · cited 10×
“& Thomas, J. (2017a). Finding relevant studies. In D. Gough, S. Oliver & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd edition, pp. 93–132). London: Sage. Brunton, J., Graziosi, S., & Thomas, J. (2017b). Tools and techniques for information management. In D. Gough, S. Oliver & J. Thomas (Eds.), An intro…”
BackgroundInfluentialShamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & the PRISMA-P Group (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647 · Cited by 13,120
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,666 · cited 1×
“Outcome data with a dichotomous structure can be transformed into Odds Ratios (OR), Absolute Risk Ratios (ARR) or Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) (for detailed discussion of dichotomous outcome effect sizes see Altman 1991).”
BackgroundMixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
Shenton, A. K. (2004) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-2004-22201 · Cited by 9,748
The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282471 · Cited by 7,403
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide
Beelmann, A., Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.11.3.244 · Cited by 5,231
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234
Avramides, A. (1992) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1992.tb00651.x · Cited by 3,704
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,270
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050
Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment
Lage, M., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220480009596759 · Cited by 2,735
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988) · doi:10.4135/9781412985000 · Cited by 2,723 · cited 1×
“For example, meta ethnography (Noblit and Hare 1988) uses ethnographic data analysis methods to explore and integrate the findings of previous ethnographies in order to create higher-level conceptual explanations of phenomena.”
MethodAromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C. M., Holly, C., Khalil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2015) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055 · Cited by 2,587 · cited 1×
“For example, care is required when assessing the way in which the source systematic reviews identified and selected data for inclusion, assessed study quality and to assess the overlap between the individual reviews (Aromataris et al. 2015).”
BackgroundSiddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803 · Cited by 2,550
The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2020) · 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--22585 · Cited by 2,437
The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search
Santos, C. M. D. C., Pimenta, C. A. D. M., & Nobre, M. R. C. (2007) · Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023 · Cited by 2,342
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611430953 · Cited by 2,239
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2014) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336 · Cited by 2,169
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 2,152
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Framing student engagement in higher education
Kahu, E. R. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 · Cited by 2,103
Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20303 · Cited by 1,956
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682
Biesta, G. (2007) · Educational Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x · Cited by 1,655
Pickering, C. M., & Byrne, J. (2013) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841651 · Cited by 1,370
Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs
Ford, M. E. (1992) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483325361 · Cited by 1,336
Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review.
Covington, M. V. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171 · Cited by 1,316
Junco, R. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004 · Cited by 1,233
Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis
HEW, K. F., & LO, C. K. (2018) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z · Cited by 1,207
Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D. (2001) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091380109601795 · Cited by 1,193
Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter?
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5 · Cited by 1,139
Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 · Cited by 1,108
Students’ engagement in first‐year university
Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701698892 · Cited by 1,075
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28 · Cited by 1,063 · cited 1×
“However, it is important to keep in mind that most reviews have elements of both (Gough et al. 2012).”
BackgroundTamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654310393361 · Cited by 1,029
Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O'Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13124 · Cited by 1,028
Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 · Cited by 1,010
Yılmaz, K. (2013) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12014 · Cited by 937
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001 · Cited by 913 · cited 3×
“Meta-narrative reviews, like critical interpretative synthesis, place centre-stage the importance of understanding the literature critically and understanding differences between research studies as possibly being due to differences between their underlying research traditions (Greenhalgh et al. 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialAn introduction to systematic reviews
Sutherland, S. E. (2004) · Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2004.02.021 · Cited by 901 · cited 1×
“Systematic reviews can therefore be defined as “a review of existing research using explicit, accountable rigorous research methods” (Gough et al. 2017, p. 4).”
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2 · Cited by 871
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., & Young, B. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106058867 · Cited by 860 · cited 2×
“Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) (Dixon-Woods et al. 2006) takes a position that there is an explicit role for the ‘authorial’ (reviewer’s) voice in the review.”
BackgroundWeight of Evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence
Gough, D. (2007) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671520701296189 · Cited by 856 · cited 1×
“There are broadly three elements that are considered in critical appraisal: the appropriateness of the study design in the context of the review question, the quality of the execution of the study methods and the study’s relevance to the review question (Gough 2007).”
BackgroundBeyond a Two-Goal Theory of Motivation and Achievement: A Case for Social Goals
Urdan, T., & Maehr, M. L. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003213 · Cited by 829
A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education
Chen, F., Lui, A. M., & Martinelli, S. M. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13272 · Cited by 822
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. F. (2014) · Administrative Issues Journal Education Practice and Research · doi:10.5929/2014.4.2.9 · Cited by 786
Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement
Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008 · Cited by 785
Handbook of arts-based research
Hacsek, Z. (2020) · Visual Studies · doi:10.1080/1472586x.2020.1741947 · Cited by 766
Borah, R., Brown, A. W., Capers, P. L., & Kaiser, K. A. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 · Cited by 737
Evidence-based policy: the promise of ‘realist synthesis’
Pawson, R. (2002) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/135638902401462448 · Cited by 729 · cited 1×
“Realist synthesis is a member of the theory-based school of evaluation (Pawson 2002).”
BackgroundCoomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017 · Cited by 720
O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5 · Cited by 681 · cited 1×
“Such automated support may result in some errors in selection, but this may be less than the human error in manual selection (O’Mara-Eves et al. 2015).”
MethodThe value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance
Coates, H. (2005) · Quality in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13538320500074915 · Cited by 679
Miake-Lye, I. M., Hempel, S., Shanman, R., & Shekelle, P. G. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x · Cited by 660
The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R. A., & Cross, M. (2015) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010 · Cited by 658
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084 · Cited by 649
Lather, P. A. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518390500450144 · Cited by 608 · cited 1×
“Validity of transgression, rather than correspondence, is suitable for evaluating critically oriented research reports using Lather’s constructs of ironic validity, paralogical validity, rhizomatic validity and voluptuous validity (Lather 1993). Rather than seeking perfect studies, systematic reviewers must ethically…”
Snilstveit, B., Oliver, S. R., & Vojtkova, M. (2012) · Journal of Development Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19439342.2012.710641 · Cited by 597
Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap
Elliott, J. H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Mavergames, C., & Gruen, R. L. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603 · Cited by 596 · cited 1×
“This means that the distribution of review effort is quite different to a standard systematic review, being a continuous lower-level effort spread over a longer time period, rather than the shorter bursts of intensive effort that characterise a review with periodic updates (Elliott et al. 2014).”
BackgroundA systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12548 · Cited by 581
Social Predictors of Changes in Students' Achievement Goal Orientations
Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0978 · Cited by 554
Butler, A., Hall, H., & Copnell, B. (2016) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12134 · Cited by 539
The School Discipline Dilemma: A Comprehensive Review of Disparities and Alternative Approaches
Welsh, R. O., & Little, S. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318791582 · Cited by 527 · cited 1×
“(2001) Doing a literature search: A comprehensive guide for the social sciences. London: Sage. Lane, J. E. (2000) New Public Management. London: Routledge. Leavy, P. (Ed.) (2018). Handbook of arts-based research.”
BackgroundMeta-study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-analysis and Meta-synthesis
Canam, C., & Thorne, S. (2001) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/ijhcqa.2001.06214fae.007 · Cited by 453
More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education
Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y · Cited by 445
On ‘Systematic’ Reviews of Research Literatures: A ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield
Hammersley, M. (2001) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920120095726 · Cited by 421 · cited 10×
“Hammersley, M. (1997a). Educational research and teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture. British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 141–161. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230203. Hammersley, M. (1997b). Reading Ethnographic Research (2nd edition). London: Longman. Hammersley, M. (2000). Evidence-…”
BackgroundInfluentialAzevedo, R. (2015) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069 · Cited by 418
Evidence‐based policy: a realist perspective
Kalucy, L. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00043.x · Cited by 407
Facilitating Student Engagement Through Educational Technology: Towards a Conceptual Framework
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.528 · Cited by 374
Self-citationHannes, K., & Macaitis, K. (2012) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794111432992 · Cited by 372
Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews
Kugley, S., Wade, A., Thomas, J., Mahood, Q., Jørgensen, A. K., Hammerstrøm, K., & Sathe, N. (2017) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.4073/cmg.2016.1 · Cited by 371 · cited 1×
“…or resilienc*) or AB = ((“positive activity”) or (“positive activities”) or experiential) or AB = ((“community based”) or “community-based”))) or (DE=”community education”)) Detailed guidance for finding effectiveness studies is available from the Campbell Collaboration (Kugley et al. 2015).”
Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice
Dawson, P. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294 · Cited by 368
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002 · Cited by 363
Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education
Bearman, M., & Dawson, P. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12092 · Cited by 357
An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd Edition)
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017) · Psychology Teaching Review · doi:10.53841/bpsptr.2017.23.2.95 · Cited by 350 · cited 19×
“Systematic reviews can therefore be defined as “a review of existing research using explicit, accountable rigorous research methods” (Gough et al. 2017, p. 4).”
BackgroundInfluentialAdvances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom
Ramnanan, C. J., & Pound, L. D. (2017) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s109037 · Cited by 349
Hammersley, M. (1991) · doi:10.4324/9781315538457 · Cited by 338
Laird, T. F. N., & Kuh, G. D. (2005) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1600-y · Cited by 320
Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence
Pawson, R. (2006) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570600595314 · Cited by 314
Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination
Smith, B. K. (2018) · Journal of Perioperative Practice · doi:10.1177/1750458918810149 · Cited by 313 · cited 1×
“It will typically include substantive findings, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic (Hart 2018, p. xiii).”
BackgroundPsychological parameters of students' social and work avoidance goals : a qualitative investigation
Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. (2001) · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.35 · Cited by 299
‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: where’s the quality in systematic review?
MacLure, M. (2005) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680930500131801 · Cited by 293 · cited 2×
“1 Given this, it is perhaps not surprising that the concept of systematic review was itself subjected to criticism by many social scientists, for example being treated as reflecting an outdated positivism ( Hammersley 2013, Chap. 8; MacLure 2005; Torrance 2004).”
BackgroundMapping the Mixed Methods–Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain
Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J. (2011) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689811427913 · Cited by 290 · cited 4×
“These different types of studies and data can be analysed together in an integrated design or segregated and analysed separately (Sandelowski et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice
Davies, P. (2000) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/713688543 · Cited by 286
Poon, O., Squire, D., Kodama, C. M., et al. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315612205 · Cited by 286
A synthesis of the literature on research methods education
Earley, M. A. (2014) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860105 · Cited by 284
Systematic review methodology in higher education
Bearman, M., Smith, C. D., Carbone, A., Slade, S., Baik, C., Hughes-Warrington, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2012) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.702735 · Cited by 275
Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning
Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475315589814 · Cited by 273
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.5477 · Cited by 270
Self-citationKnight, B. (2014) · doi:10.1080/02601370.2014.946244 · Cited by 265
He, W., Holton, A. J., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001 · Cited by 265
Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2014) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005 · Cited by 258
Educational Research and Teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture
Hammersley, M. (1997) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192970230203 · Cited by 248
Chalmers, I. (2003) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716203254762 · Cited by 248
Motivation and Achievement in Early Adolescence
Wentzel, K. R. (1993) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431693013001001 · Cited by 247
Research synthesis and meta‐analysis
Norris, J., Ortega, L., & Plonsky, L. (2012) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12004_3 · Cited by 237
Carroll, C., & Booth, A. (2015) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1128 · Cited by 235 · cited 1×
“Quality scales for appraising qualitative research tend to focus on the extent to which the study is authentic in reflecting on the meaning of the data (for detailed discussion of the issues associated with assessing study quality in this tradition see Carroll and Booth 2015).”
BackgroundMaking Evidence-based Practice Educational
Elliott, J. (2001) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920120095735 · Cited by 234
Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: a systematic review of flipped classroom research
Lundin, M., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0101-6 · Cited by 227
A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Human Goals
Chulef, A. S., Read, S. J., & Walsh, D. A. (2001) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1012225223418 · Cited by 220
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005 · Cited by 220
Wagner, C., Garner, M., & Kawulich, B. B. (2011) · doi:10.1080/03075070903452594 · Cited by 206
How Appropriate are Popular Sample Size Formulas?
Kupper, L. L., & Hafner, K. B. (1989) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1989.10475628 · Cited by 196
Inverting the Linear Algebra Classroom
Talbert, R. (2014) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2014.883457 · Cited by 191
Student engagement research in higher education: questioning an academic orthodoxy
Zepke, N. (2014) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901956 · Cited by 185
How Do We Model Learning at Scale? A Systematic Review of Research on MOOCs
Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Graesser, A. C., & Brooks, C. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317740335 · Cited by 182
Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., & Hew, K. F. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.003 · Cited by 180
Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.003 · Cited by 179
Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Expert Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice
Lewthwaite, S., & Nind, M. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00071005.2016.1197882 · Cited by 177 · cited 6×
“MacLure, M. (2005). Clarity bordering on stupidity: where’s the quality in systematic review? Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500131801. Newell, R. W. (1986). Objectivity, empiricism and truth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Nisbet, J., & Broadfoot, P. (1980). The impact…”
BackgroundInfluentialPhysical Activity and School Engagement in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Owen, K., Parker, P. D., Zanden, B. E. V., MacMillan, F., Astell‐Burt, T., & Lonsdale, C. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1151793 · Cited by 175
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2019) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20293 · Cited by 174
García, S., & Saavedra, J. (2017) · doi:10.3102/0034654317723008 · Cited by 167
Kilburn, D., Nind, M., & Wiles, R. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00071005.2014.918576 · Cited by 161
Evidence-informed practice in education: meanings and applications
Nelson, J., & Campbell, C. (2017) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2017.1314115 · Cited by 156 · cited 1×
“The increased focus on the use of research evidence to inform policy and practice decision-making in Evidence Informed Education (Hargreaves 1996; Nelson and Campbell 2017) has increased the attention given to contextual and methodological limitations of research evidence provided by single studies.”
BackgroundRoussel, P., Elliot, A. J., & Feltman, R. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.003 · Cited by 151
Eccles, J. S. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003 · Cited by 149
Same‐level peer‐assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review
Tai, J., Molloy, E., Haines, T. P., & Canny, B. J. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12898 · Cited by 144
Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Sanchez, C. E., Moshontz, H., & Cooper, H. M. (2014) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1127 · Cited by 144
Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making
Sheldon, T. A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308521 · Cited by 143
Article Commentary: The Study of Goals in Psychology
Dweck, C. S. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00019.x · Cited by 141
Baumeister, R. F. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3994-3_8 · Cited by 137
Objectivity in Educational Research
Eisner, E. (1992) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.1992.11075389 · Cited by 136
The automation of systematic reviews
Tsafnat, G., Dunn, A., Glasziou, P., & Coiera, E. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f139 · Cited by 131 · cited 1×
“…Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts • Handsearching of specialist journals or books • Contacts with Experts • Citation Checking New, federated search engines are being developed, which search multiple sources at the same time, eliminating duplicates automatically (Tsafnat et al. 2013).”
BackgroundKiefer, S. M., & Ryan, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.417 · Cited by 131
If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter if it doesn't work in theory?
Chalmers, I. (2005) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/1744264053730806 · Cited by 130
The politics of evidence and methodology: lessons from the EPPI-Centre
Oakley, A., Gough, D., Oliver, S. R., & Thomas, J. (2005) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/1744264052703168 · Cited by 128
Katikireddi, S. V., Egan, M., & Petticrew, M. (2015) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204711 · Cited by 126
Avoiding the “déjà-variable” phenomenon: social psychology needs more guides to constructs
Hagger, M. S. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00052 · Cited by 123
DeVellis, R. F. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Social Measurement · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00095-5 · Cited by 120
The effect of authentic m‐learning activities on student engagement and motivation
Alioon, Y., & Delialioğlu, Ö. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12559 · Cited by 117
Thatcher, S. G. (2014) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/20140113 · Cited by 113
Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 6: risk of bias assessment
Waddington, H. S., Aloe, A. M., Becker, B. J., Djimeu, E. W., Hombrados, J. G., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., & Reeves, B. C. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.015 · Cited by 110 · cited 1×
“…investigating the impact of interventions using (quasi) experimental research designs tend to emphasis establishing descriptive causality through minimising the effects of bias (for detailed discussion of issues associated with assessing study quality in this tradition see Waddington et al. 2017).”
BackgroundRapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward
Thomas, J., Newman, M., & Oliver, S. (2013) · Evidence and Policy · doi:10.1332/174426413x662572 · Cited by 109 · cited 1×
“Where such ‘shortcuts’ are taken there may be some loss of rigour, breadth and/or depth (Abrami et al. 2010; Thomas et al. 2013).”
BackgroundStudying for the sake of others: the role of social goals on academic engagement
King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. (2012) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.730479 · Cited by 106
Systematic reviews in medical education: A practical approach: AMEE Guide 94
Sharma, R., Gordon, M. A., Dharamsi, S., & Gibbs, T. J. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.970996 · Cited by 106
Undocumented Students in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature, 2001 to 2016
Björklund, P. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318783018 · Cited by 106
Expressions of excellence and the assessment of applied and practice‐based research
Oancea, A., & Furlong, J. J. (2007) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671520701296056 · Cited by 103 · cited 2×
“…in what is done during critical appraisal: which dimensions of study design and methods are considered; the particular issues that are considered under each dimension; the criteria used to make judgements about these issues and the cut off points used for these criteria (Oancea and Furlong 2007).”
BackgroundInquiry-Based Learning and the Flipped Classroom Model
Love, B., Hodge, A., Corritore, C. L., & Ernst, D. C. (2015) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1046005 · Cited by 102
Classroom goal structures, social achievement goals, and adjustment in middle school
Shim, S. S., Cho, Y., & Wang, C. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.008 · Cited by 98
Methods that teach: developing pedagogic research methods, developing pedagogy
Nind, M., & Lewthwaite, S. (2018) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2018.1427057 · Cited by 98 · cited 2×
“Pring (Eds.), Evidence-Based Practice in Education (pp. 164–186), Maidenhead: Open University Press. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2013). Learning from research: systematic reviews for informing policy decisions: A quick guide.”
BackgroundA Social Goals Perspective on Children's Social Competence
Erdley, C. A., & Asher, S. R. (1999) · Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/106342669900700304 · Cited by 97
The impact of research on policy and practice in education
Ross, A., Nisbet, J., & Broadfoot, P. (1981) · doi:10.1007/bf00598128 · Cited by 88
Beverley, C., Booth, A., & Bath, P. A. (2003) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x · Cited by 85
Changing Our Landscape of Inquiry for a New Science of Education
Thomas, G. (2012) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.82.1.6t2r089l715x3377 · Cited by 85 · cited 10×
“, & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59. Bedenlier, S., Kondakci, Y., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Two decades of research into the internationalization of higher education: major…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTHE PROMISE AND PITFALLS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Mullen, P. D., & Ramı́rez, G. (2006) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102239 · Cited by 84
Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence
Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Persson, T. J., Bethel, E. C., Hanz, K., & Surkes, M. A. (2010) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/174426410x524866 · Cited by 83
Caird, J., Sutcliffe, K., Kwan, I., Dickson, K., & Thomas, J. (2015) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/174426514x13988609036850 · Cited by 81 · cited 1×
“It is also possible to have hybrid review models consisting of a review of reviews and then new systematic reviews of primary studies to fill in gaps in coverage where there is not an existing review (Caird et al. 2015).”
BackgroundChow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9437-7 · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“We may therefore inadvertently overestimate the positive effects of an educational intervention because we do not find studies with negative or smaller effects (Chow and Eckholm 2018).”
BackgroundKing, R. B., & Ganotice, F. A. (2013) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0148-z · Cited by 78
A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment
Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913 · Cited by 74
Østby, G., Urdal, H., & Dupuy, K. E. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318800236 · Cited by 67
Editorjtcs (2020) · Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik · doi:10.4135/9781412953948.n343 · Cited by 60
Expectations and implementations of the flipped classroom model in undergraduate mathematics courses
Naccarato, E., & Karakok, G. (2015) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2015.1071440 · Cited by 59
The teaching and learning of social research methods: developments in pedagogical knowledge
Nind, M., Kilburn, D., & Luff, R. (2015) · doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1062631 · Cited by 58
Johnson, R. M. (2019) · Journal of Diversity in Higher Education · doi:10.1037/dhe0000150 · Cited by 57
The (Non-)Use of Configurative Reviews in Education
Levinsson, M., & Prøitz, T. S. (2017) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2017.1297004 · Cited by 57
Student engagement: buzzword of fuzzword?
Vuori, J. (2014) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2014.936094 · Cited by 55
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Askie, L. M., & Offringa, M. (2015) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2015.10.002 · Cited by 52
Early adolescents’ social goals and school adjustment
Dawes, M. (2017) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9380-3 · Cited by 51
Hard to teach: inclusive pedagogy in social science research methods education
Nind, M., & Lewthwaite, S. (2018) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1355413 · Cited by 50
Salaber, J. M. (2014) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2014.03.006 · Cited by 50
Resistances to new technologies of evaluation: education research in the UK as a case study
Oakley, A. (2006) · doi:10.1332/174426406775249741 · Cited by 49
Systematic reviews: Guidelines, tools and checklists for authors
Lockwood, C. S., & Oh, E. G. (2017) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.12353 · Cited by 48
Does secondary school size make a difference?
Newman, M., Garrett, Z., Elbourne, D. R., Bradley, S., Noden, P., Taylor, J., & West, A. (2006) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.03.001 · Cited by 46 · cited 1×
“For example, a systematic review about the relationship between school size and student outcomes collected data from the primary studies about each schools funding, students, teachers and school organisational structure as well as about the research methods used in the study (Newman et al. 2006).”
BackgroundDeveloping and Applying a Protocol for a Systematic Review in the Social Sciences
Campbell, A., Taylor, B. J., Bates, J. A., & O'Connor, Ú. (2017) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2017.1281827 · Cited by 45
What is Voice? Issues of Identity and Representation in the Framing of Reviews
Baker, B. (1999) · doi:10.3102/00346543069004365 · Cited by 42
An immersive flipped classroom for learning Mandarin Chinese: design, implementation, and outcomes
Tseng, M.-F., Lin, C., & Chen, H. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1440603 · Cited by 39
Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1984) · doi:10.1080/0141192840100202 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“More commonly seen in education research, outcome data with a continuous structure can be translated into Standardised Mean Differences (SMD) (Fitz-Gibbon 1984).”
BackgroundHammersley, M. (2008) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920802031468 · Cited by 34
Engaging the "Race Question": Accountability and Equity in U.S. Higher Education
Dowd, A. C. (2015) · doi:10.5860/choice.190877 · Cited by 34
Rethinking Motivation Goals for Adolescents: Beyond Achievement Goals
Mansfield, C. F. (2012) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00506.x · Cited by 33
Hammersley, M. (2008) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/17437270801919826 · Cited by 32
Conducting systematic review in education: a reflexive narrative
Nind, M. (2006) · London Review of Education · doi:10.1080/14748460600855500 · Cited by 29
Kuiper, S., Carver, R. H., Posner, M. A., & Everson, M. G. (2015) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1045573 · Cited by 29
Techniques for identifying cross-disciplinary and ‘hard-to-detect’ evidence for systematic review
O’Mara-Eves, A., Brunton, G., McDaid, D., Kavanagh, J., Oliver, S. R., & Thomas, J. (2013) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1094 · Cited by 28
Solmon, M. A. (2006) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2006.9671801 · Cited by 24
Inverted Pedagogy in Second Semester Calculus
Kennedy, E., Beaudrie, B., Ernst, D. C., & Laurent, R. T. S. (2015) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2015.1031301 · Cited by 23
Introducing Systematic Reviews
Tod, D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12263-8_1 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“Systematic reviews can therefore be defined as “a review of existing research using explicit, accountable rigorous research methods” (Gough et al. 2017, p. 4).”
BackgroundToward a Flipped Classroom Instructional Model for History education: A Call for Research
Lo, C. K. (2017) · International Journal of Culture and History (EJournal) · doi:10.18178/ijch.2017.3.1.075 · Cited by 20
Re-considering the ontoepistemology of student engagement in higher education
Westman, S., & Bergmark, U. (2018) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2018.1454309 · Cited by 19
Including systematic reviews in PhD programmes and candidatures in nursing – ‘Hobson's choice’?
Olsson, C., Ringnér, A., & Borglin, G. (2014) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2014.01.005 · Cited by 18
Managing multiple goals in real learning contexts
Mansfield, C. F. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.01.003 · Cited by 18
A critical participatory and collaborative method for scoping the literature
Bassett, R., & McGibbon, E. (2012) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9715-2 · Cited by 18
Newman, M., Reeves, S., & Fletcher, S. (2018) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000200 · Cited by 14 · cited 1×
“The ‘data’ for reviews of reviews are previous reviews rather than primary research studies (see for example Newman et al. (2018).”
BackgroundPreparing Youth in Foster Care for College Through an Early Outreach Program
Johnson, R. M., & Strayhorn, T. (2019) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2019.0051 · Cited by 13
Comparing recruitment strategies in a study of acupuncture for chronic back pain
Sherman, K. J., Hawkes, R. J., Ichikawa, L., Cherkin, D. C., Deyo, R. A., Avins, A. L., & Khalsa, P. S. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-69 · Cited by 11 · cited 2×
“An overview of the various approaches to synthesizing qualitative research and their differences with regard to epistemological assumptions, the extent of iteration during the review process, and quality assessment is provided by Barnett-Page and Thomas (2009). As Martyn Hammersley points out in Chap.”
BackgroundMethodWhat Are the Social Values of College Students?: A Social Goals Approach
McCollum, D. L. (2005) · Journal of College and Character · doi:10.2202/1940-1639.1469 · Cited by 11
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0762-3 · Cited by 10
Objectivity, Empiricism and Truth
Burke, T. (1987) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1987.tb01995.x · Cited by 10
Quality and literature reviews: beyond reporting standards
Bearman, M. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12984 · Cited by 10
Models for understanding student engagement in digital learning environments
Wiseman, P., Kennedy, G. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2016) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2016.828 · Cited by 9
Evidence-based practice in education and the contribution of educational research
Hammersley, M. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470699003.ch8 · Cited by 8
Some Potential “Pitfalls” in the Construction of Educational Systematic Reviews
Coverdale, J., Roberts, L. W., Beresin, E. V., Louie, A. K., Brenner, A. M., & Balon, R. (2017) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40596-017-0675-7 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z · Cited by 852
Self-citationEmergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x · Cited by 527
“…rapidly emerging field of ERT in higher education, a systematic review was pre-registered (Händel, Bedenlier et al., 2020) and conducted using explicit and transparent methods (Gough et al., 2012; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2020), and guided by the PRISMA reporting guidelines (Page et al., 2020).”
MethodSelf-citationArtificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review
Salas-Pilco, S., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12080569 · Cited by 326
“A systematic review is an explicit and systematic process for identifying, extracting, and synthesizing knowledge gained from a variety of empirical studies to answer research questions [27].”
BackgroundGonzález-Salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su122410366 · Cited by 254
Yılmaz, K. (2021) · MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.33206/mjss.791537 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Zawacki‐Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W4255215277
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 202
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Funded by Editor
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- systematic reviews, educational research, evidence synthesis, evidence-based education, research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review