Cited by 46Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Analysis and microelectronic design of tubular electrode arrays intended for chronic, multiple singleunit recording from captured nerve fibres

Loeb, G. E., Marks, W. B., Beatty, P. G.·1977·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02442964

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loeb, G. E., Marks, W. B., & Beatty, P. G.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
1977-03
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
195-201
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W2122927536
Cited by
46
References
34
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
single-unit recording, chronic neural recording, signal-to-noise ratio, nerve regeneration, microelectrode design
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Electronics, Microelectrodes, Nerve Regeneration, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review