Cited by 194Food composition and propertiesNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Impact of cereal fibre on glucose-regulating factors

Open access
Weickert, M. O., Mohlig, M., Koebnick, C., Holst, J. J., Namsolleck, P., Ristow, M., Osterhoff, M., Rochlitz, H. +3 more·2005·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Insoluble dietary fibre intake is associated, by unknown mechanisms, with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether a short-term dietary intervention with purified insoluble fibres influences acute and delayed responses of glucose, insulin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1.Methods Fourteen healthy women with NGT were studied for 300 min on six to eight occasions. Subjects consumed three matched portions of control (C) or fibre-enriched bread (10.4-10.6 g/portion; wheat fibre [WF], oat fibre [OF], and, in a substudy [n=9], resistant starch [RS]) followed by control (C-C, C-WF, C-OF, C-RS) on subsequent days.Results Fibre enrichment accelerated the early insulin response (fibrextime interaction p=0.026 for WF, p<0.001 for OF, p=0.126 for RS; time of maximal concentration [T(max)], C 57.9+/-5.9, WF 49.3+/-2.5 [p=0.086], OF 46.1+/-2.9 [p=0.026], RS 46.7+/-5.8 min [p=0.029]). It was also associated with an earlier postprandial GIP response after OF (T(max), C 83.6+/-7.2, WF 70.7+/-6.0 [p=0.054], OF 64.3+/-6.9 [p=0.022], RS 60.0+/-5.0 [p>0.15]). Increased fibre intake for 24 h was further associated with a reduced postprandial glucose response on the following day subsequent to ingestion of a control meal (AUC(C-C) 4,140+/-401, AUC(C-WF) 2,850+/-331 [p=0.007], AUC(C-OF) 2,830+/-277 [p=0.011]), with no difference in maximal concentration and T(max) of glucose responses. No differences in insulin responses were observed 24 h after the fibre-enriched diets compared with control (p>0.15). Colonic fermentation was increased only on study days C-OF (p=0.017) and C-RS (p=0.016).Conclusions/interpretation The consumption of highly purified insoluble dietary fibres accelerated the acute GIP and insulin response and was further associated with enhanced postprandial carbohydrate handling the following day upon ingestion of a control meal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-005-1941-x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is much evidence in the literature to support an association between dietary fibre intake and insulin sensitivity.

    “There is much evidence in the literature to support an association between dietary fibre intake and insulin sensitivity [30,31,32,33,34,35].”

    From The Health Benefits of Dietary Fibre (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports a prior study finding improved peripheral insulin sensitivity after a high-fibre diet, which supports an association. But this paper did not measure insulin sensitivity in its own participants; it presents that mechanism as one possible explanation for improved glucose handling, so it does not by itself establish the claim's breadth of evidence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weickert, M. O., Mohlig, M., Koebnick, C., Holst, J. J., Namsolleck, P., Ristow, M., Osterhoff, M., Rochlitz, H., Rudovich, N., Spranger, J., & Pfeiffer, A. F. H.
Affiliations
  • German Institute of Human Nutrition (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Weickert, M. O.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2005-09-20
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
2343-2353
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2072769007
Cited by
194
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
insoluble dietary fiber, cereal fiber, type 2 diabetes prevention, glycemic response, insulin response, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1, wheat fiber, oat fiber, resistant starch, colonic fermentation, postprandial blood glucose, healthy women, gastrointestinal hormones, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Bread, Edible Grain, Colon, Dietary Fiber, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Glucose, Humans, Hydrogen, Insulin, Random Allocation, Starch, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review