Cited by 348Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryHallucinations in medical conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 157 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in understanding and treating persecutory delusions: a review

Open access
Freeman, Daniel, Garety, Philippa·2014·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Persecutory delusions are a central psychotic experience, at the severe end of a paranoia spectrum in the general population. The aim of the review is to provide an introduction to the understanding of persecutory delusions, highlight key putative causal factors that have the potential to be translated into efficacious treatment, and indicate future research directions. METHODS: A narrative literature review was undertaken to highlight the main recent areas of empirical study concerning non-clinical and clinical paranoia. RESULTS: Six main proximal causal factors are identified: a worry thinking style, negative beliefs about the self, interpersonal sensitivity, sleep disturbance, anomalous internal experience, and reasoning biases. Each has plausible mechanistic links to the occurrence of paranoia. These causal factors may be influenced by a number of social circumstances, including adverse events, illicit drug use, and urban environments. CONCLUSIONS: There have been numerous replicated empirical findings leading to a significant advance in the understanding of persecutory delusions, now beginning to be translated into cognitive treatments. The first trials specifically focussed on patients who have persecutory delusions in the context of psychotic diagnoses are occurring. Initial evidence of efficacy is very promising.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-014-0928-7

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 The distribution of total paranoia scores in the general population [15]
Fig. 1 The distribution of total paranoia scores in the general population [15]CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 The paranoia hierarchy [14]
Fig. 2 The paranoia hierarchy [14]CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Outline of factors involved in delusion formation [31]
Fig. 3 Outline of factors involved in delusion formation [31]CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tiernan B, Tracey R, Shannon C (2014) Paranoia and self-concepts in psychosis. Psychiatry Res 30:202–313
  2. Freeman D, Freeman J (2012) You can be happy: the scientifically proven way to change how you feel. Prentice Hall Life, Harlow

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, D., & Garety, P.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Daniel
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2014-07-09
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
1179-1189
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2013939918
Cited by
348
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10121)
  • King's College London
  • Medical Research Council (G0902308)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
persecutory delusions, paranoia, negative self-beliefs, interpersonal sensitivity, sleep disorders, reasoning biases, cognitive intervention, psychosis, illicit drug use, urban environment, life events
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Culture, Delusions, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Paranoid Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Paranoid, Severity of Illness Index, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review