Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,033

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment

Turker, Duygu·2009·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Albinger, H. S. and S. J. Freeman: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243–253. doi: 10.1023/A:1006289817941 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ashforth, B. E. and F. Mael: 1989, ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. doi: 10.2307/258189 · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 · Paper page
  3. Aupperle, K. E.: 1982, ‘An Empirical Inquiry into the Social Responsibilities as Defined by Corporations: An Examination of Various Models and Relationships’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia
  4. Backhaus, K. B., B. A. Stone and K. Heiner: 2002, ‘Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness’, Business & Society, 41(3), 292–318. doi: 10.1177/0007650302041003003 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Balfour, D. L. and B. Wechsler: 1996, ‘Organizational Commitment: Antecedents and Outcomes in Public Organizations’, Public Productivity & Management Review, 19(3), 256–77. doi: 10.2307/3380574 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (NewYork, Harper and Row).
  7. Burke, L. and J. M. Logsdon: 1996, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’, Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502. doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(96)00041-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G · DOI · Paper page
  9. Carroll, A. B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. doi: 10.1177/000765039903800303 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Charkham, J.: 1994, Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries (Oxford, Claredon). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1994, A Risk Based Model of Stakeholder Theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics University of Toronto, Toronto
  12. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. doi: 10.2307/258888 · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994 · Paper page
  13. Cook, J. and T. Wall: 1980, ‘New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, organizational commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfillment’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39–52. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Daft, R. L.: 2003, Management (USA, Thomson South-Western).
  15. Davis, K.: 1960, ‘Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?’, California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Davis, K. and R. L. Blomstrom: 1966, Business and its Environment (New York, McGraw-Hill).
  17. Dunham, R. B., J. A. Grube and M. B. Castaneda: 1994, ‘Organizational Commitment: The Utility of an Integrated Definition’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 370–380. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.370 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich and J. M. Harquail: 1994, ‘Organizational Images and Member Identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. doi: 10.2307/2393235 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Eells, R, C. Walton: 1974, Conceptual Foundations of Business (3rd ed.) (Burr Ridge, IL, Irwin).
  20. Epstein, E. M.: 1987, ‘The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness’, California Management Review, 29(3), 99–114. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Etheredge, J. M.: 1999, ‘The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: An Alternative Scale Structure’, Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1023/A:1006077708197 · DOI
  22. Fitch, H. G.: 1976, ‘Achieving Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 38–46. doi: 10.2307/257357 · doi:10.5465/amr.1976.4408754
  23. Frederick, W. C.: 1960, ‘The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility’, California Management Review, 2(4), 54–61. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman).
  25. Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham: 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey).
  26. Hewstone, M. and J. M. F. Jaspars: 1984, ‘Social Dimensions of Attribution’. In: H. Tajfel (ed.), The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ. Press), pp. 379–404. · DOI
  27. Hogg, M. A., D. J. Terry and K. M. White: 1995, ‘A Tale of Two Theories : A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269. doi: 10.2307/2787127 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Huselid, M. and N. Day: 1991, ‘Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Turnover: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 380–39. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.380 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.380 · Paper page
  29. Johnson, H. H.: 2003, ‘Does it Pay to Be Good? Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Business Horizons, 46, 34–40. doi: 10.1016/S0007-6813(03)00086-7 · DOI
  30. Jones, T. M.: 1980, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined’, California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kanter, R. M.: 1968, ‘Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities’, American Sociological Review, 33(4), 499–517. doi: 10.2307/2092438 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mahon, J. F.: 2002, ‘Corporate Reputation: A Research Agenda Using Strategy and Stakeholder Literature’, Business & Society, 41(4), 415–445. doi: 10.1177/0007650302238776 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Maignan, I. and O. C. Ferrell: 2000, ‘Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France’, Journal of Business Ethics,23(3), 283–297. doi: 10.1023/A:1006262325211 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Maignan, I., O. C. Ferrell: 2001, ‘Corporate Citizenship as a Marketing Instrument’, European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457–484. doi: 10.1108/03090560110382110 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Maignan, I., O. C. Ferrell and G. T. Hult: 1999, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455–469. doi: 10.1177/0092070399274005 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Marsden, P. V., A. L. Kallenberg and C. R. Cook: 1993, ‘Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work Positions and Family Roles’, Work and Occupations, 20(3), 368–390. doi: 10.1177/0730888493020003005 · DOI · Paper page
  37. McGuire, J. W.: 1963, Business and Society (New York, McGraw-Hill).
  38. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren, T. Schnrrweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi: 10.2307/256342 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Meyer, J. P. and N. J. Allen: 1997, Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application (Thousands Oaks, CA, Sage). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, and R. M. Steers: 1982, Employee Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover (New York, Academic Press).
  41. Mowday, R. T., R. M. Steers and L. W. Porter: 1979, ‘The Measurement of Organizational Commitment’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Naess, A.: 2001, in D. Rothenberg (trans. and ed.) Ecology, Community and Life-Style: Outline of an Ecosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
  43. Pava, M. L. and J. Krausz: 1996, ‘The Association between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost’, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357. doi: 10.1007/BF00382958 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Peterson, D. K.: 2004, ‘The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment’, Business and Societ, 43(3), 296–319. doi: 10.1177/0007650304268065 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–65.
  46. Quazi, A. M. and D. O’Brien 2000 An Empirical Test of a cross-national model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1006305111122 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Reichers, A. E.: 1986, ‘Conflict and Organizational Commitments’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 508–514. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.508 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.508 · Paper page
  48. Riordan, C. M., R. D. Gatewood and J. B. Bill: 1997, ‘Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 401–412. doi: 10.1023/A:1017989205184 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Rupp, D. E., J. Ganapathi, R. V. Aguilera and C. A. Williams: 2006, ‘Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Organizational Justice Framework’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543. doi: 10.1002/job.380 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Sethi, S. P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytic Framework’, California Management Review,17(3), 258–64. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Sims, R. R.: 2003, Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Giants Fall (USA, Praeger Publishers).
  52. Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell, and K. L. Kraft: 1996, ‘The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Scale Development’, Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 245–255.
  53. Smith, W. J., R. E. Wokutch, K. V. Harrington and B. S. Dennis: 2001, ‘An Examination of the Influence of Diversity and Stakeholder Role on Corporate Social Orientation’, Business and Society, 40(3), 266–294. doi: 10.1177/000765030104000303 · DOI
  54. Snider, J., R. P. Hill and D. Martin: 2003, Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004606.29523.db · DOI · Paper page
  55. Stanwick, P. A. and S. D. Stanwick: 1998, ‘The Determinants of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination’, American Business Review, 16(1), 86–93.
  56. Stone, E. F. and L.W. Porter: 1975, ‘Job Characteristics and Job Attitude: A Multivariate Study’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 57–64. doi: 10.1037/h0076357 · DOI
  57. Tajfel, H., J. C. Turner: 1985 The Social Identity Theory of Group Behavior. In: H. Tajfel (ed.), The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ. Press), pp.15–40.
  58. Turker, D.: 2006, ‘The Impact of Employee Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: A Scale Development Study’, Unpublished Master Dissertation, Dokuz Eylul University
  59. Vakola, M. and I. Nikolaou: 2005, ‘Attitudes towards Organizational Change: What is the Role of Employees’ Stress and Commitment?’, Employee Relation, 25(2), 160–174. doi: 10.1108/01425450510572685 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Verdeyen, V., J. Put, and B·V. Buggenhout: 2004, ‘A Social Stakeholder Model’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(4), 325–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2004.00328.x · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2004.00328.x
  61. Viswesvaran, C., S. P. Deshpande and C. Milman: 1998, ‘The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Counterproductive Behaviour’, Cross Cultural Management, 5(4), 5–12. doi: 10.1108/13527609810796835 · doi:10.1108/13527609810796835
  62. Welsch, H. P. and H. LaVan: 1981, ‘Inter-relationships between organizational commitment and Job Characteristics, Professional Behavior, and Organizational Climate’, Human Relations, 34(12), 1079–1089. doi: 10.1177/001872678103401205 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Werther, W. B. and D. Chandler: 2006, Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment, (USA, Sage Publications).
  64. Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpaa: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximazing Stakeholder Value. (London, Pitman).
  65. Whetten, D. A. and A. A. Mackey: 2002, ‘Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation’, Business & Society, 41(4), 393–414. doi: 10.1177/0007650302238775 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Wiener, Y. 1982 Commitment in Organization: A Normative View. Academy of Management Review 7(3): 418–428. doi: 10.2307/257334 · doi:10.5465/amr.1982.4285349 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,033

Metadata

Authors
Turker, D.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-11-22
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
189-204
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8
OpenAlex
W2021825526
Cited by
1,033
References
6
FWCI
25.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8
The paper
Turker, D. (2009). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.