Cited by 568Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Neurobiological Circuits Regulating Attention, Cognitive Control, Motivation, and Emotion: Disruptions in Neurodevelopmental Psychiatric Disorders

Arnsten, Amy F.T., Rubia, Katya·2012·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This article aims to review basic and clinical studies outlining the roles of prefrontal cortical (PFC) networks in the behavior and cognitive functions that are compromised in childhood neurodevelopmental disorders and how these map into the neuroimaging evidence of circuit abnormalities in these disorders. Method Studies of animals, normally developing children, and patients with neurodevelopmental disorders were reviewed, with focus on neuroimaging studies. Results The PFC provides "top-down" regulation of attention, inhibition/cognitive control, motivation, and emotion through connections with posterior cortical and subcortical structures. Dorsolateral and inferior PFC regulate attention and cognitive/inhibitory control, whereas orbital and ventromedial structures regulate motivation and affect. PFC circuitries are very sensitive to their neurochemical environment, and small changes in the underlying neurotransmitter systems, e.g. by medications, can produce large effects on mediated function. Neuroimaging studies of children with neurodevelopmental disorders show altered brain structure and function in distinctive circuits respecting this organization. Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder show prominent abnormalities in the inferior PFC and its connections to striatal, cerebellar, and parietal regions, whereas children with conduct disorder show alterations in the paralimbic system, comprising ventromedial, lateral orbitofrontal, and superior…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.008

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More widespread dysfunctions have been observed in ADHD, involving lateral prefrontal cortex and its connections to basal ganglia, medial frontal, cingulate and orbital frontal regions, and dissociated fronto-parietal, fronto-limbic and fronto-cerebellar networks.

    “However, more widespread dysfunctions have been observed in ADHD, involving not only the lateral prefrontal cortex and its connections to the basal ganglia, but also medial frontal, cingulate and orbital frontal regions, and the dissociated fronto-parietal, fronto-limbic and fronto-cerebellar networks they form part of Arnsten and Rubia (2012) and Rubia et al. (2014a).”
  • A fronto-striato-thalamic circuit is involved in the etiology of ADHD, comprising reciprocal connections between the caudate, putamen, thalamus, supplementary motor area, lateral prefrontal cortex, and parietal lobe.

    “a fronto-striato-thalamic circuit has been involved in etiology of ADHD, comprising reciprocal connections between the caudate, putamen, thalamus, supplementary motor area, lateral prefrontal cortex, and parietal lobe.”
  • This fronto-striato-thalamic circuit is critical to executive functions, including working memory and inhibitory control, known to be impaired in ADHD.

    “This circuit is critical to executive functions, including working memory and inhibitory control, known to be impaired in ADHD (21, 22).”
  • Stimulants increase underfunctioning frontostriatal mechanisms in ADHD.

    “Caudate and putamen are dysfunctional in ADHD, together with prefrontal regions 2, 3, 7, 37, suggesting that stimulants increase underfunctioning frontostriatal mechanisms in ADHD (71).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnsten, A. F. T., & Rubia, K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Arnsten, Amy F.T.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
356-367
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001389318
Cited by
568
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (053272/Z/98/Z/JRS/JP/JAT)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (RL1AA017536)
  • National Center for Research Resources (U54RR024350)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, neurodevelopmental disorders, attention, cognitive control, inhibition, motivation, emotion regulation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, paralimbic system, orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, neurotransmitter systems, child psychopathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Mental Disorders, Brain, Brain Diseases, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Cognition, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Internal-External Control, Motivation, Nerve Net, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review