Cited by 116Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesChild and Animal Learning Development

Predicting Developmental Status from 12 to 24 Months in Infants at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary Report

Open access
Macari, Suzanne L., Campbell, Daniel, Gengoux, Grace W., Saulnier, Celine A., Klin, Ami J., Chawarska, Katarzyna·2012·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The study examined whether performance profiles on individual items of the Toddler Module of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule at 12 months are associated with developmental status at 24 months in infants at high and low risk for developing Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). A nonparametric decision-tree learning algorithm identified sets of 12-month predictors of developmental status at 24 months. Results suggest that identification of infants who are likely to exhibit symptoms of ASD at 24 months is complicated by variable patterns of symptom emergence. Fine-grained analyses linking specific profiles of strengths and deficits with specific patterns of symptom emergence will be necessary for further refinement of screening and diagnostic instruments for ASD in infancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1521-0

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lord C Luyster R Gotham K Guthrie W Risi S Rutter M (in press) Autism diagnostic observation schedule—toddler module manual Los Angeles, CA Western Psychological Services

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macari, S. L., Campbell, D., Gengoux, G. W., Saulnier, C. A., Klin, A. J., & Chawarska, K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Macari, Suzanne L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-04-07
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
2636-2647
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2030278404
Cited by
116
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087554)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD003008)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, early screening, decision tree induction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Child Development, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review