Cited by 37Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Observational learning from animated models: Effects of studying–practicing alternation and illusion of control on transfer

Open access
Wouters, Pieter, Paas, Fred, van Merriënboer, Jeroen J. G.·2010·Instructional Science

Abstract

Animated models explicating how a problem is solved and why a particular method is chosen are expected to be effective learning tools for novices, especially when abstract cognitive processes or concepts are involved. Cognitive load theory was used to investigate how learners could be stimulated to engage in genuine learning activities. It was hypothesized that illusion of control would impede transfer performance compared to a condition without illusion of control. Moreover, we hypothesized that learners who first studied an animated model and then solved the same problem would perform better on transfer than learners who studied the same animated model twice or who first solved the problem and then studied the animated model. In a 2 × 3 factorial experiment ( N = 90) with the factors illusion of control (yes vs. no) and instruction method (study–practice, practice–study, study–study) only the first hypothesis was confirmed. Implications for the design of animated models are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-008-9079-0

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A prior knowledge test consisting of four multiple-choice and eight open items about probability calculation was used to measure students' prior knowledge.

    “A prior knowledge test consisting of four multiple-choice and eight open items about probability calculation (see Wouters et al., 2009Wouters et al., , 2010) ) was used to measure students' prior knowledge.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Trafton, J. G., & Reiser, B. (1993). The contributions of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In Cognitive Science Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15 th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1017-1022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Corresponding author
Wouters, Pieter
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2008-09-30
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
89-104
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2161089844
Cited by
37
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (411-02-163)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
observational learning, animated models, illusion of control, transfer of learning, cognitive load theory, problem solving, instructional design, novice learners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review