Cited by 158Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPhysical Activity and HealthNerve injury and regeneration

Beneficial effects of moderate voluntary physical exercise and its biological mechanisms on brain health

Open access
Ma, Qiang·2008·Neuroscience Bulletin

Abstract

This article reviewed the beneficial effects of moderate voluntary physical exercise on brain health according to the studies on humans and animals, which includes improving psychological status and cognitive function, enhancing psychological well-being, decreasing the risks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia, and promoting the effects of antidepressant and anxiolytic. The possible underlying neurobiological mechanisms are involved up-active and down-active pathways. The up-active pathway is associated with enhancements of several neurotransmitters systems afferent to hippocampus, including norepinephrine (NE), serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), acetylcholine (ACh) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The down-active pathway is mainly concerned with up-regulation of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurogenesis. It is suggested that NE activation via beta-adrenergic receptors may be essential for exercise-induced BDNF up-regulation. The possible intracellular signaling pathways of NE-mediated BDNF up-expression may be involved in GPCR-MAPK-PI-3K crosstalk and positive feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12264-008-0402-1

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Q.
Affiliations
Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Ma, Qiang
Venue
Neuroscience Bulletin
Published
2008-08
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
265-270
ISSN
  • 1995-8218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1673-7067
OpenAlex
W182877123
Cited by
158
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
brain health, cognitive function, psychological well-being, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, antidepressant effects, anxiolytic effects, norepinephrine, beta-adrenergic receptors, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurogenesis, hippocampus, neurotransmitter systems, GABA, serotonin, acetylcholine
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Dementia, Humans, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Signal Transduction, Exercise, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review