Cited by 118Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach

Open access
Vilardaga, Roger, Hayes, Steven C., Levin, Michael E., Muto, Takashi·2009·The Behavior Analyst

Abstract

Behavior analysis is a field dedicated to the development and application of behavioral principles to the understanding and modification of the psychological actions of organisms. As such, behavior analysis was committed from the beginning to a comprehensive account of behavior, stretching from animal learning to complex human behavior. Despite that lofty goal, basic behavior analysis is having a generally harder time finding academic support, and applied behavior analysis has narrowed its focus. In the present paper we argue that both of these trends relate to the challenge of human language and cognition, and that developments within clinical behavior analysis and the analysis of derived relational responding are providing a way forward. To take full advantage of these developments, however, we argue that behavior analysts need to articulate their unique approach to theory, to develop more flexible language systems for applied workers, and to expand their methodological flexibility. This approach, which we term contextual behavioral science, is meant as an evolutionary step that will allow behavior analysis to better capture the center of modern psychological concerns in both the basic and applied areas. Clinical behavior analysis is showing a way forward for behavior analysis to regain its vision as a comprehensive approach to behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03392178

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [8]8. Barnes-Holmes, D., Cochrane, A., Barnes- Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & McHugh, L. (2004). Aceptacio ´n psicolo ´gica: Ana ´lisis experimental e interpretaciones teo ´ricas. International Journal of Psychology & Psy- chological Therapy, 4, 517-530.
  2. [10]10. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Establecimiento en nin ˜os pequen ˜os de comportamiento relacional de acuerdo a ma ´s-que y menos-que como conducta oper- ante generalizada. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 531-558.
  3. [19]19. Burgos, J. E., & Donahoe, J. W. (2000). Structure and function in selectionism: Implications for complex behavior. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experi- mental and applied analysis of human behav- ior (pp. 39-57). Reno, NV: Context Press.
  4. [20]20. Chantry, D. (2007). Talking ACT: Notes and conversations on acceptance and commitment therapy. Reno, NV: Context Press.
  5. [23]23. Dahl, J., Lundgren, T. (2007, May). Bull's eye, validity and reliability. In J. Plumb (Chair), Engaging in life: Values and valued action as catalysts for change. Symposium conducted at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego.
  6. [37]37. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experi- ments. Oxford, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
  7. [60]60. Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1992a). Under- standing verbal relations. Reno, NV: Context Press.
  8. [62]62. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper's World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97-111.
  9. [63]63. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., Reese, H. W., & Sarbin, T. R. (1993). Varieties of scientific contextualism. Reno, NV: Context Press.
  10. [95]95. Leigland, S. (1997). Systems and theories in behavior analytic science: An overview of alternatives. In L. Hayes & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Investigations in behavioral epistemol- ogy (pp. 11-31). Reno, NV: Context Press.
  11. [99]99. Lillis, J. (2008). Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of obesity-related stigma and sustained weight loss. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.
  12. [118]118. Muto, T. (2008, May). Switch your clinical- psychological OS!: From DSM to ''turtle.'' In E. Sandoz (Chair), Beyond categorical thinking: Using the hexaflex for diagnosis, assessment, and intervention. Workshop conducted at the fourth ACT Summer Institute, Chicago.
  13. [126]126. Parrott, L. J. (1983). Systematic foundations for the concept of private events: A critique. In N. M. Smith, P. T. Mountjoy, & D. Ruben (Eds.), Radical reassessment in psy- chology: The interbehavioral alternative (pp. 251-268). New York: University of America Press.
  14. [132]132. Richelle, M. (2000). Walden Two at fifty. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experi- mental and applied analysis of human behav- ior (pp. 313-322). Reno, NV: Context Press.
  15. [139]139. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.
  16. [154]154. Tonneau, F. (2004). Book review: Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 265-268.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vilardaga, R., Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., & Muto, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • Ritsumeikan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Vilardaga, Roger
Venue
The Behavior Analyst
Published
2009-04
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
105-133
ISSN
  • 0738-6729 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8918
OpenAlex
W2626029674
Cited by
118
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Behavior Analyst (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017868)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
contextual behavioral science, clinical behavior analysis, derived relational responding, applied behavior analysis, behavioral theory, methodological flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review