Cited by 170Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The role of the cingulate gyrus in depression: From functional anatomy to neurochemistry

Ebert, Dieter, Ebmeier, Klaus P.·1996·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Depressive episodes as reversible mental states are likely to be associated with equally reversible brain states. These can be examined with a variety of functional imaging methods using repeated measures designs. Studies using such an approach are reviewed. Changes in medial frontal, and in particular, cingulate cortex are reported in a majority of studies. Similarities and differences between different study results are discussed on the background of the functional neuroanatomy of the anterior cingulate, taking into account a variety of neurotransmitter systems. It is concluded that neuroimaging techniques are starting to equip us to conceptualize functional changes in the limbic loop containing the anterior cingulate as the common denominator of change and therapy effects in depressive states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00320-7

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frontopolar and subgenual cingulate cortex are important nodes in a network of brain regions implicated in the pathogenesis of major depression.

    “The frontopolar and subgenual cingulate cortex, which have been linked with the experience of guilt in healthy participants (see above), are important nodes in a network of brain regions that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of major depression (Seminowicz et al. 2004;Ebert and Ebmeier, 1996;Drevets and Sayvitz, 2008;Mayberg, 2007).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Ebert and Ebmeier, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebert, D., & Ebmeier, K. P.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Ebmeier, Klaus P.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
1044-1050
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027112427
Cited by
170
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cingulate gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, depression, functional neuroanatomy, neurotransmitter systems
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Depressive Disorder, Dominance, Cerebral, Energy Metabolism, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Neural Pathways, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review