Cited by 889Stress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major Depression

Acute and chronic stress effects on open field activity in the rat: Implications for a model of depression

Open access
Katz, R.J., Roth, K.A., Carroll, B.J.·1981·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The initial activity of a rat placed in novel surroundings (i.e., open field activity) has been taken as an indicator of its emotional state. We have investigated the effects of immediately antecedent stress upon open field activity in comparison with basal (i.e., unstressed) activity, and additionally, the effects of a history of chronic stress upon the above behavioral patterns. Acute exposure to a non-traumatic, non-debilitating stress (noise and light) consistently increased activity in comparison with basal activity. A history of chronic stress on the other hand reduced basal activity from control levels, and eliminated the activation response to acute stress. This lack of acute activation may bear some resemblance to depression on several grounds. Behaviorally it represents a "refractory loss of interest." Also, chronically stressed rats showed endocrine changes similar to those seen in human depressives. Finally, antidepressant treatment with the monoamine oxidase inhibitor pargyline restored the ability of chronically stressed rats to respond actively to stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90005-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A rat exposed to constantly shifting but invariably stressful conditions daily will develop something akin to major depression.

    “The theory is that a rat exposed to constantly-shifting-but-invariably-stressful conditions on a daily basis will develop something akin to a major depression 11 .”

    From Fraudulent studies are undermining the reliability of systematic reviews: on the prevalence of problematic images in preclinical depression studies (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Description of Second Factor (page not available) describes varied, unpredictable stressors, but says they were separated by one to two days rather than administered daily. The Abstract and Discussion (pages not available) frame the resulting changes in open-field behavior as a possible model with parallels to clinical depression, not as a demonstration that rats develop major depression. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bruning, J. L. and B. L. Kintz. Computational Handbook of Statistics, (2nd ed.). Glenview Illinois: Scott Foresman and Co., 1977.
  2. Carroll, B. J. Psychiatric disorders and steroids. In: Neuroregu- lators and Psychiatric Disorders, edited by E. Usdin and D. Hamburg. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
  3. Glazer, H. I. and J. M. Weiss. Long term interference effect; an alternative to learned helplessness. J. exp. Psychol. Anita. Be- hav. Proc. 2: 202-213, 1976.
  4. Mayer-Gross, W., E. Siater and M. Roth. Clinical Psychiatr3'. (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilking, 1969.
  5. Walsh, R. N. and R. A. Cummins. The open field test--a critical review. Psychol. Bull. 83: 482-504, 1976.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, R. J., Roth, K. A., & Carroll, B. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Katz, R.J.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
247-251
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987491785
Cited by
889
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
acute stress, chronic stress, open field behavior, depression model, stress response, endocrine changes, pargyline, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, antidepressant treatment, rats
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Chronic Disease, Corticosterone, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress, Physiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review