Cited by 16Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Sleep and dreaming

Tononi, Giulio·2009·The Neurology of Consciousness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-374168-4.00008-3

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The level of consciousness may depend on the brain's ability to integrate information.

    “theoretical considerations suggest that the level of consciousness may depend on the brain s ability to integrate information[80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tononi, G.
Corresponding author
Tononi, Giulio
Venue
The Neurology of Consciousness
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2009
Pages
89-107
OpenAlex
W3020824930
Cited by
16
References
95
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
sleep, dreams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review