Cited by 641Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Of dreaming and wakefulness

Open access
Llinás, R.R., Paré, D.·1991·Neuroscience

Abstract

Following a set of studies concerning the intrinsic electrophysiology of mammalian central neurons in relation to global brain function, we reach the following conclusions: (i) the main difference between wakefulness and paradoxical sleep lies in the weight given to sensory afferents in cognitive images; (ii) otherwise, wakefulness and paradoxical sleep are fundamentally equivalent brain states probably subserved by an intrinsic thalamo-cortical loop. From this assumption, we conclude that wakefulness is an intrinsic functional realm, modulated by sensory parameters. In support of this hypothesis, we review morphological studies of the thalamocortical system, which indicate that only a minor part of its connectivity is devoted to the transfer of direct sensory input. Rather, most of the connectivity is geared to the generation of internal functional modes, which may, in principle, operate in the presence or absence of sensory activation. These considerations lead us to challenge the traditional Jamesian view of brain function according to which consciousness is generated as an exclusive by-product of sensory input. Instead, we argue that consciousness is fundamentally a closed-loop property, in which the ability of cells to be intrinsically active plays a central role. We further discuss the importance of spatial and temporal mapping in the elaboration of cognitive and perceptual constructs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90075-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Llinás, R. R., & Paré, D.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Llinás, R.R.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
521-535
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072574332
Cited by
641
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 13742, P01NS013742)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
wakefulness, REM sleep, thalamocortical loop, consciousness, sensory afferents, brain states, thalamocortical connections, cognitive image
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Awareness, Brain, Cell Membrane, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Consciousness, Dreams, Electroencephalography, Hallucinations, Humans, Mammals, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Neurons, Perception, Sensation, Sensory Thresholds, Sleep, Sleep, REM, Thalamus, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review