Cited by 49Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Changes in the contribution of snacks to the daily energy intake of Finnish adults

Ovaskainen, Marja-Leena, Tapanainen, Heli, Pakkala, Heikki·2010·Appetite

Abstract

This study presents data on the contribution of eating occasions to the daily intakes of energy and nutrients. The 48-h dietary data of Finnish adults were gathered from two independent, population-based health surveys undertaken in 2002 and 2007. Snack-dominated and main-meal dominated eating patterns were defined as the habit of obtaining the majority of daily energy from snacks or from main meals. The snack-dominated eating pattern increased in adults from 2002 to 2007, significantly in men. Mostly, similar changes in daily nutrient intakes were observed between study years within eating patterns. Higher alcohol intake in men and higher sucrose intake and lower fibre intake in women were associated with the snack-dominated eating pattern. Due to instability in the snack-dominated eating pattern we conclude that main meals and snacks seem to be parallel ways of composing daily diet with only a few dietary differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2010.03.012

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The period of time used to separate different eating occasions varies across studies, with intervals of 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, or 1 h reported.

    “Indeed, the period of time used to separate different EO varies across studies, with intervals of 15 min( 40 , 42 , 50 ), 30 min( 53 ) or 45 min( 15 ) or 1 h( 51 ) reported.”
  • Meal patterns were mostly participant-identified, although these studies varied in the additional criteria used to determine an individual eating occasion, meal and/or snack, and their treatment of beverages.

    “Meal patterns were mostly participant-identified( 15 , 23 , 45 – 48 , 52 , 53 , 57 , 66 , 69 , 70 , 75 , 77 , 78 , 82 ), although these studies varied in the additional criteria used to determine an individual EO, meal and/or snack, and their treatment of beverages.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ovaskainen, M.-L., Tapanainen, H., & Pakkala, H.
Affiliations
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Corresponding author
Ovaskainen, Marja-Leena
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
623-626
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042920724
Cited by
49
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
snacking, dietary habits, daily energy intake, nutrient intake, main meals, alcohol consumption, sucrose intake, dietary fiber, sex differences, Finnish adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fiber, Feeding Behavior, Female, Finland, Food, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Dietary Sucrose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review