Cited by 134Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutritional Studies and Diet

Contribution of snacks and meals in the diet of French adults: a diet-diary study

Bellisle, F., Dalix, A.M., Mennen, L., Galan, P., Hercberg, S., de Castro, J.M., Gausseres, N.·2003·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

To investigate the relative contributions of meals and snacks in the daily intake of free-living humans, 54 French adults maintained food intake diaries for four 7-day periods. They recorded all food and fluid intakes mentioning whether, in their opinion, each intake event was a snack or a meal. The weekly food diaries also contained information on the circumstances of each event such as time and place, number of persons present, and affective states (hunger, satiety, etc.) before and after intake. On average, 2.7 meals and 1.3 snacks were consumed each day. Very few days included no snacking. Total daily energy and nutrient intake were not different between days with and days without snacks. Snacks differed from meals in several dimensions. Meals were about twice as large as snacks in energy and weight. Nutrient intake, in absolute values, was higher in meals. In proportions, however, snacks contained more CHO and less fat and proteins. Most foods were consumed in larger amounts in the context of meals but a few (sweets, cereal bars, biscuits, and sodas) were mostly consumed as snacks. Hunger was more intense before but less intense after meals than snacks. The satiety ratio was higher for snacks than meals. Time of day affected many intake parameters. For example, afternoon snacks exhibited a high satiety ratio for a modest intake. The present study describes the status of several potential determining factors at the time of snacks in humans, demonstrating a specific role for snacks, as opposed to meals, in the daily eating pattern of healthy adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00088-x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellisle, F., Dalix, A. M., Mennen, L., Galan, P., Hercberg, S., de Castro, J. M., & Gausseres, N.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR)
Corresponding author
Bellisle, F.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
183-189
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153716790
Cited by
134
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
snacks, meals, dietary habits, dietary intake, energy intake, nutrient intake, satiety, hunger, time of day, eating context, French adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Circadian Rhythm, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Satiety Response, Seasons, Diet Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review