Cited by 320Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural Plasticity of the Hippocampus and Amygdala Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy in Major Depression

Open access

Abstract

Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) elicits a rapid and robust clinical response in patients with refractory depression. Neuroimaging measures of structural plasticity relating to and predictive of ECT response may point to the mechanisms underlying rapid antidepressant effects and establish biomarkers to inform other treatments. Here, we determine the effects of 1) diagnosis and 2) ECT on global and local variations of hippocampal and amygdalar structure in major depression and predictors of ECT-related clinical response Methods Longitudinal changes in hippocampal and amygdala structure were examined in patients with major depression (N= 43, scanned thrice; prior to ECT, after the 2nd ECT session, and within one week of completing the ECT treatment series) referred for ECT as part of their standard clinical care. Cross-sectional comparisons with demographically similar controls (N= 32, scanned twice) established effects of diagnosis. Results Patients showed smaller hippocampal volumes compared to controls at baseline (p<.04). Both hippocampal and amygdalar volumes increased with ECT (p<.001) and in relation to symptom improvement (p<.01). Hippocampal volume at baseline predicted subsequent clinical response (p<.05). Shape analysis revealed pronounced morphometric changes in the anterior hippocampus and basolateral and centromedial amygdala. All structural measures remained stable across time in controls. Conclusions ECT induced neuroplasticity in the hippocampus and amygdala relates to improved clinical response and is pronounced in regions with prominent connections to ventromedial prefrontal cortex and other limbic structures. Smaller hippocampal volumes at baseline predict a more robust clinical response. Neurotrophic processes including neurogenesis shown in preclinical studies may underlie these structural changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.029

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electroconvulsive therapy promotes structural plasticity including increased volume and morphometric changes in the hippocampus and the amygdala along with improved clinical responses, especially in patients with a smaller hippocampal volume.

    “Recent clinical studies showed that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) promoted structural plasticity including increased volume and morphometric changes in the hippocampus and the amygdala along with improved clinical responses, especially in patients with a smaller hippocampal volume (Joshi et al. 2016; Nordanskog et al. 2010; Tendulkar et al. 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Joshi, S. H., Espinoza, R. T., Pirnia, T., Shi, J., Wang, Y., Ayers, B., Leaver, A., Woods, R. P., & Narr, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Narr, Katherine L.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
282-292
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030957288
Cited by
320
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 25
FWCI
27.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH092301, K24MH102743)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
electroconvulsive therapy, major depressive disorder, hippocampus, amygdala, structural plasticity, hippocampal volume, amygdala volume, neuroimaging biomarkers, basolateral amygdala, centromedial amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, neurogenesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review