The DOI matches its Crossref record; 359 of the 363 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 164 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review
Open accessAbstract
With the development of modern high-throughput omic measurement platforms, it has become essential for biomedical studies to undertake an integrative (combined) approach to fully utilise these data to gain insights into biological systems. Data from various omics sources such as genetics, proteomics, and metabolomics can be integrated to unravel the intricate working of systems biology using machine learning-based predictive algorithms. Machine learning methods offer novel techniques to integrate and analyse the various omics data enabling the discovery of new biomarkers. These biomarkers have the potential to help in accurate disease prediction, patient stratification and delivering of precision medicine. This review paper explores different integrative machine learning methods which have been used to provide an in-depth understanding of biological systems during normal physiological functioning and in the presence of a disease. It provides insight and recommendations for interdisciplinary professionals who envisage employing machine learning skills in multi-omics studies.
Checked 2026-10-09 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys machine learning approaches for integrating multi-omics data, organizing methods into concatenation-, model-, and transformation-based strategies for supervised and unsupervised learning. It provides background, application examples, challenges, and a recommendation flowchart for interdisciplinary method selection.
Key findings
- Multi-omics integration methods are grouped into three main classes: concatenation-based, model-based, and transformation-based, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages for combining omics data.
- The review reports that most multi-omics studies focus on cancer, especially breast and ovarian cancer, and that integration can improve understanding of disease complexity beyond single-omics analysis.
- It cites examples including an ADNI study using neuroimaging, biochemical, and genetic biomarkers to discriminate early Alzheimer’s patients from healthy volunteers with 98% accuracy, and notes class imbalance examples such as primary hypertension at 95% prevalence versus endocrine hypertension at 5%.
- A recommendation flowchart is proposed to help interdisciplinary teams choose an appropriate integration method, but the paper states that no “one-size-fits-all” approach is feasible.
Methods
- Narrative review of supervised and unsupervised ML strategies for multi-omics integration, explicitly excluding reinforcement, hybrid, multi-view, and self-supervised learning because they have not gained enough momentum in multi-omics analysis.
- Summarizes integration methods, published multi-omics studies, ML terminology, algorithms, and advantages/disadvantages in tables, and presents a recommendation flowchart.
- No primary dataset or experimental analysis is reported; the paper synthesizes existing literature and examples.
Limitations
- The authors state that existing literature does not provide many direct comparisons between methods using the same publicly available datasets, and that empirical investigation guided by ML practitioners is recommended.
- The review’s scope excludes several emerging ML specializations, including reinforcement, hybrid, multi-view, and self-supervised learning.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search protocol or quantitative synthesis, and the provided version is a journal pre-proof with production artifacts.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 164 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The commonly used ML algorithms have different attributes (Table 4) and therefore it is crucial to choose an appropriate algorithm for the multi-omics analysis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.5 What algorithm works best for what conditions?
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is evident from Table 8 that most of the multi-omics studies focus on different forms of cancer.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 5 APPLICATION OF INTEGRATIVE METHODS IN MULTI-OMICS STUDIES
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many intra-omics studies have successfully explored the integration of gene expression and DNA methylation.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 5 APPLICATION OF INTEGRATIVE METHODS IN MULTI-OMICS STUDIES
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Currently, many of the multi-omic reviews are focussed on individual sub-topics.For example, designing studies (Haas et al., 2017;Hasin et al., 2017), setting up workflows (Kohl et al., 2014), choosing software tools (Misra et al., 2019) and evaluating overfitted performance (McCabe et al., 2020).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Health-based big data including linked information for patients, such as their clinical data (for example gender, age, pathological and physiological history) and omics data (such as genetics, proteomics and metabolomics) has now become more widely available (Canuel et al., 2015;Singhal et al., 2016).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There has been unprecedented growth in the development of precision medicine supported by ML (machine learning) approaches (Delavan et al., 2017;Peterson et al., 2013;Zou et al., 2017) and data mining tools (Chawla and Davis, 2013;Cheng et al., 2015;Margolies et al., 2016).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“High-throughput generated omics data (Lightbody et al., 2019) has played a pivotal role in developing precision medicine biomarkers for diseases such as Alzheimer's (Hampel et al., 2017(Hampel et al., , 2016;;Kovacs, 2016), diabetes (Capobianco, 2017;McCarthy, 2017;Mutie et al., 2017), cancer (Borad and LoRusso, 2017;Senft et al., 2017), hypertension (Barnes et al., 2016;Dominiczak et al., 2017),”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.1 Multi-omics
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“It has pushed the performance of classifiers beyond that of traditional ML algorithms, especially in scenarios involving large-scale datasets with high dimensionality.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.2 Machine learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LeCun et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, such data has been used for precision (also called personalised or stratified) medicine to provide customised healthcare, i.e. providing a bespoke treatment for individuals (Gibson et al., 2015;Kalaitzopoulos, 2016;Malod-Dognin et al., 2017).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gibson et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Kalaitzopoulos, 2016
- Not checked yetcites Malod-Dognin et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, ML may have deteriorated performance for certain single omics such as gene data due to inherent characteristics (Kim et al., 2020).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kim et al., 2020 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 56
- It may state two separate claims as one. 41
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Figure 1 shows the number of publications indexed on the Web of Science website (Clarivate Analytics, 2020) with different key topics.This information was collected from the Web of Science by entering a different keyword and searching across all databases 2 .Although the use of ML in medical science can be dated back to 1970s (Davenport and Kalakota, 2019), more rapid growth is evident in the past”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Bias-variance trade-off
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clarivate Analytics, 2020
- Not checked yetcites Davenport and Kalakota, 2019 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Moreover, publications based on ‗multi-omics integration' and ‗multi-omics and machine learning' have started to emerge in the last 5 years and have gained popularity in precision and computational medicine domain.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Bias-variance trade-off
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clarivate Analytics, 2020
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Today a plethora of multi-omic integration methods are available for both supervised and unsupervised learning as evident in the current review.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 6 RECOMMENDATIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also, unfortunately, the existing literature does not provide many direct comparisons between methods using the same publicly available datasets.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Deep learning has emerged in recent years as the leading class of ML algorithms.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.2 Machine learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LeCun et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although various ML specialisations such as reinforcement (Coronato et al., 2020), hybrid (Zhou et al., 2019), multi-view (Zhao et al., 2017) and selfsupervised learning (Chen et al., 2019) are now emerging in generic health-care applications, they have not yet gained enough momentum in multi-omics analysis, hence they remain beyond the scope of this review.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although ML analysis of multi-omics is still in its embryonic stage, it has already been explored for a wide range of applications, as reported in recent reviews on brain diseases (Garali et al., 2018;Young et al., 2013), diabetes (Kavakiotis et al., 2017), cancers (Borad and LoRusso, 2017;Chaudhary et al., 2017;Wong et al., 2016) cardiovascular disease (Weng et al., 2017), medical imaging (Ericks”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 1 INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In recent years, with the increasing availability of affordable computing power and high-throughput omics data and the success of artificial intelligence technology in various fields, the use of ML has become popular in health sciences (Lee and Yoon, 2017;Clifton et al., 2015;Hung, 2019;Barnett-Itzhaki et al., 2020;Kirchebner et al., 2020).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.2 Machine learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee and Yoon, 2017
- Not checked yetcites Clifton et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Hung, 2019 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, these omics have also been integrated for COVID-19 studies (Barh et al., 2020;Overmyer et al., 2020;Zhou et al., 2020).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.1 Multi-omics
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Overall, these omics provide a complete picture of cell biology and related cellular function (Cox, 2009).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.1 Multi-omics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cox, 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“On the other hand, it is very computationally intensive, requiring highthroughput or high-performance hardware, and lacks explainability (transparency) in feature selection (black-box approach), in the sense that it is difficult to extract from the network the features that the network has found as mainly responsible for the task, e.g.classification (LeCun et al., 2015).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 2.2 Machine learning
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LeCun et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, primary hypertension is the most common form of hypertension with 95% prevalence while endocrine hypertension occurs in only 5% (Rimoldi et al., 2014).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.2 Class imbalance and overfitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rimoldi et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, techniques such as regularisation, bagging, hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation can used to balance bias-variance trade-off (Lee, 2010).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.2 Class imbalance and overfitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee, 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, there are few other challenges related to multi-omics studies which are not ML related such as study design (Haas et al., 2017), multi-site sample collection & management (Pinu et al., 2019), multi-site data sharing and governance (Saulnier et al., 2019), visualisation (Mougin et al., 2018), ethical standards (Lévesque et al., 2018), and finally making the research reproducible (Conesa”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.6 Translating ML: bench to bedside
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since each multi-omics dataset is unique, using a similar workflow could allow the selection of the best-suited algorithm.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.5 What algorithm works best for what conditions?
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although deep learning is widely popular in other related domains (such as medical imaging (Erickson et al., 2017) and clinical natural language processing (Wu et al., 2020)), the interest has been more limited for multi-omics analysis (X.Tan et al., 2020).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Bias-variance trade-off
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Erickson et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites Wu et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites X.Tan et al., 2020
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of these reviews have strived to introduce different categorical terminologies (for example: ‗'early', ‗late' and ‗intermediate' in (Gligorijević and Pržulj, 2015) or ‗bottom-up' and ‗top-down' in (Yu and Zeng, 2018)) which enable them to group the integration methods based on different factors/parameters.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4 DATA INTEGRATION METHODS FOR MULTI-OMICS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gligorijević and Pržulj, 2015
- Not checked yetcites Yu and Zeng, 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In recent years, various new data integration methods have been introduced from the modern developments in mathematical, statistical and computational sciences.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4 DATA INTEGRATION METHODS FOR MULTI-OMICS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In recent years, ML models can be deployed on dedicated graphics processing units (Schmidhuber, 2015) and cloud computing platforms (Armbrust et al., 2010) such as Amazon EC2 (-Amazon EC2,‖ n.d.), Microsoft Azure (-Cloud Computing Services | Microsoft Azure,‖ n.d.) and Google Cloud Platform (-Cloud Computing Services,‖ n.d.).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.4 Computation and storage cost
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmidhuber, 2015
- Not checked yetcites Armbrust et al., 2010 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All the above challenges directly impact the use of ML for multi-omics analysis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.6 Translating ML: bench to bedside
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, transcriptomics and proteomics use different normalisation and scaling techniques before omics analysis.This leads to different dynamic ranges and data distribution.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3 CHALLENGES IN MULTI-OMICS ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, various artificial intelligence-driven automated ML platforms and tools (Feurer et al., 2015;Olson et al., 2018;Waring et al., 2020) have also emerged which can be utilised to exhaustively search for best ML model and corresponding parameter tuning, however, they are computationally expensive.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.5 What algorithm works best for what conditions?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Feurer et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Olson et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Waring et al., 2020 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Various ML based multi-omics publications have emerged in the past 5 years (see Figure 1) and some use performance metrics such as decision curve (Vickers and Elkin, 2006) and calibration (Dankers et al., 2019) analytics to evaluate their diagnostic utility.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.6 Translating ML: bench to bedside
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vickers and Elkin, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Dankers et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the literature, many reviews cover the key strengths and weaknesses of different ML algorithms using single omics (Amancio et al., 2014;López Pineda et al., 2015;Sakr et al., 2017;Uddin et al., 2019) and multi-omics (Ma et al., 2016;Francescatto et al., 2018;J. Xu et al., 2019;Sathyanarayanan et al., 2020) datasets.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 3.5 What algorithm works best for what conditions?
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Joint NMF is computationally slow and needs large memory allocation.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Shen (Shen et al., 2009) proposed iCluster framework which used principles similar to NMF but allows integration of datasets having negative values.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shen et al., 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fridley (Fridley et al., 2012) has studied the genomic effects due to the gemcitabine drug using high-throughput data from mRNA expression and SNPs.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fridley et al., 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The iCluster+ framework can discover patterns and combine a range of omics having binary, categorical and continuous values and was demonstrated by combining genomic data from the colorectal cancer datasets.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mo et al., 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They integrated these two datasets into one large input matrix and developed a Bayesian pathway analysis which uses a stochastic search variable selection.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fridley et al., 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Commonly, concatenation-based integration does not require any preprocessing and hence does not have a Stage 2.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1 Concatenation-based integration methods
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“joint factor analysis to evaluate the feature space and converted it into shared and datatype-specific components.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ray et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In scenarios where the number of features in the joint matrix are higher, different feature selection methods described in Section 3 can be employed during concatenation (Sorzano et al., 2014).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sorzano et al., 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, multivariate LASSO models (Zou, 2006;Nicolai and Bühlmann Peter, 2010;Mankoo et al., 2011) have been investigated.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It was used to investigate gene expression and miRNA data on brain tumour samples.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lock et al., 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Their proposed that the Bayesian integrative model offers better performance in detecting the genomic effects in comparison to using conventional single-omics analysis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fridley et al., 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“iClusterBayes includes a binary indicator prior for selection of variable and generalises for binary data and count data.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mo et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It overcomes the limitations of iCluster+, in terms of statistical inference and computational speed.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mo et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Zhu (Zhu et al., 2012) has also explored BN (Bayesian network) to understand cell regulation in yeast using metabolomics and transcriptomics data.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhu et al., 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These methods use all the concatenated features equally and can select the most discriminating features for a given phenotype.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1 Concatenation-based integration methods
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Also, LRAcluster (Wu et al., 2015) was developed to integrate high-dimensional multi-omics data and find low-dimensional manifold to identify molecular subtypes of cancer.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wu et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“MoCluster was validated by integrating proteomic and transcriptomic data and shows a noticeably higher clustering accuracy and lower computation cost in comparison to both Cluster and iCluster+.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Meng et al., 2016a
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another adaptation of NMF was evaluated as JIVE (Joint and Individual Variation Explained) which captures joint variation across integrating data types and structural variation of each data type along with the residual noise (Lock et al., 2013).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lock et al., 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This approach allows the analysis of the improvement in the predictive power for individual models and also finds the best discriminating features.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.2 Model-based integration methods
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, iClusterBayes was introduced by Mo (Mo et al., 2018), which is a fully Bayesian latent variable model.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.1.2 Unsupervised learning concatenation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mo et al., 2018
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Recently, MOSAE (Multi-omics Supervised Autoencoder) (K.Tan et al., 2020) was developed for pan-cancer analysis and compared with conventional ML methods such as SVM, DT, naïve Bayes, KNN, RF and AdaBoost.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites K.Tan et al., 2020
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, it is evident from the literature that kernel-based algorithms have superior performance to graph-based approaches, but they usually need more time for the training phase.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.1 Supervised learning transformation-based methods
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ideally, requires all omics data for all patients.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Concatenation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It uses grammatical evolution neural networks along with Biofilter (Bush et al., 2009) and Random Jungle (Schwarz et al., 2010) to investigate different categorical and quantitative variables and develop prediction models.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bush et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Schwarz et al., 2010 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Does not consider the unique distribution of each omics.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Concatenation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lemon-Tree (Bonnet et al., 2015) implemented ensemble methods for reconstructing module networks which used somatic copy number alterations and gene expression in brain tumour samples.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.2.2 Unsupervised learning model-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bonnet et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Meta-SVM (Meta-analytic SVM) is proposed by Kim (Kim et al., 2017), which integrates multiple omics data and able to detect consensus genes associated with diseases across studies such as breast cancer and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.2 Unsupervised learning transformation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kim et al., 2017 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Denoising autoencoder has been incorporated along with L1-penalized logistic regression for identifying ovarian cancer subtypes (Guo et al., 2020).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guo et al., 2020 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Recently, NEMO (NEighborhood based Multi-Omics clustering) (Rappoport and Shamir, 2019) is introduced which uses an inter-patient similarity matrix-based distance metric for evaluating the input omic datasets individually.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.2 Unsupervised learning transformation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rappoport and Shamir, 2019 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Need proper normalisation before concatenation.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Concatenation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Does not increase dimensional complexity.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Model-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lately, rMKL-LPP (regularised multiple kernel learning for Locality Preserving Projections) (Speicher and Pfeifer, 2015) was implemented for clustering analysis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.2 Unsupervised learning transformation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Speicher and Pfeifer, 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Most of them are kernel and graph-based algorithms (Yan et al., 2017).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.1 Supervised learning transformation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yan et al., 2017 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not effective if omics data is extremely heterogeneous.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Model-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the past years, ATHENA (Analysis Tool for Heritable and Environmental Network Associations) was developed for analysing multi-omics data (Chung and Kang, 2019;Holzinger et al., 2014).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chung and Kang, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Holzinger et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Graph representation easy to understand and computationally less intensive.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Transformation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Facilitates the understanding of interactions amongst different omics.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Model-Based
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Kernel methods provide superior performance.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Transformation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“It uses a two-step process and limits the integration to only two datatypes.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.2.2 Unsupervised learning model-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yuan et al., 2011 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Omics data can be from a different set of patients with a similar phenotype.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Model-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transformation can be sometimes challenging.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Transformation-Based
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Later, these representations are integrated to predict cancer subtype classification.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites J.Xu et al., 2019
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Memory and computation-intensive when the concatenated matrix is large.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Concatenation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“MOLI (multi-omics late integration) (Sharifi-Noghabi et al., 2019) method used type-specific encoding sub-networks to learn features from somatic mutation, CNA and gene expression data independently and then later concatenated them for predicting the response to a given drug.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharifi-Noghabi et al., 2019 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, graph-based approaches can disclose the relations between samples while taking less computation time.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.1 Supervised learning transformation-based methods
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multi-omics data for the same patient can be used for their disease subgroup analysis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Transformation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These omics matrices are then combined into one matrix and then analysed using spectral-based clustering.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.3.2 Unsupervised learning transformation-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rappoport and Shamir, 2019 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, the presence of many multi-omics studies related to breast (Chen et al., 2017;Lee et al., 2017;List et al., 2014;Ma et al., 2016;Nam et al., 2009) and ovarian (Anděl et al., 2015;Mankoo et al., 2011;Paik et al., 2017;Zhang et al., 2014) cancer highlights the research thrust by the scientific community in these domains.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 5 APPLICATION OF INTEGRATIVE METHODS IN MULTI-OMICS STUDIES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2017 source
- Not checked yetcites Anděl et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Furthermore, SNF (Similarity Network Fusion) (Wang et al., 2014) constructs networks of samples for respective data type and then effectively fuse them into a joint network which denotes the complete range of original data.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 4.2.2 Unsupervised learning model-based methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Weak signals could be lost.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Model-Based
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Kernel methods are computationally more intensive than graph methods.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Transformation-Based
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Could lead to an overfitted solution”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > Model-Based
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the different recent multi-omics studies highlight the superiority of integration methods in understanding the complexity of different diseases and uncovering the underlying abnormalities from the vastly generated multi-omics data, which is not always possible with individual omics analysis.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Metabolomics and proteomics have been integrated using RF for analysis of prostate cancer (Fan et al., 2011) and thyroid functioning (Pietzner et al., 2017).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, metabolomics is integrated with mRNA for studying ulcerative colitis (Bjerrum et al., 2014) and cancer survival (Kim et al., 2014).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bjerrum et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Kim et al., 2014 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“LASSO methods have been used for this particular integration by Taskesen (Taskesen et al., 2015) and Lee (Lee et al., 2017) for acute myeloid leukaemia and breast cancer respectively.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > 5 APPLICATION OF INTEGRATIVE METHODS IN MULTI-OMICS STUDIES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taskesen et al., 2015 source
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2017
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clearly, a ‗one-size-fits-all' approach is not feasible.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Multi-omics studies have also been successfully conducted in plants (potato (Acharjee et al., 2016(Acharjee et al., , 2011))) and animals (such as canine heart disease (Li et al., 2015)).”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Acharjee et al., 2016 source
- Not checked yetcites Li et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, mRNA -miRNA integration was investigated using Neural Fuzzy Network for colorectal cancer (Vineetha et al., 2013), SVM for pancreatic cancer (Kwon et al., 2015), and RF for cardiac tissue ageing (Dimitrakopoulos et al., 2014) and ovarian cancer (Anděl et al., 2015) respectively.”
§ Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis > J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“With increasingly sophisticated -omics technologies, the dimensionality of data increases rapidly, thereby surpassing the number of cases, which remains similar over time. This phenomenon is described as the “curse of dimensionality”44.”
From Orchestrating explainable artificial intelligence for multimodal and longitudinal data in medical imaging (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Concatenation is described as both needing and not needing preprocessing
MinorSection 4.1 says concatenation-based integration commonly requires no preprocessing, but Table 6 says it needs proper normalisation before concatenation.
“Commonly, concatenation-based integration does not require any preprocessing and hence does not have a Stage 2.”
“ Need proper normalisation before concatenation.”
Model-based workflow assigns individual models to different stages
MinorThe workflow says individual omics models are developed in Stage 2 and integrated in Stage 3, but the later description places the individual omics models in Stage 3.
“The final multi-dimensional joint model in Stage 4 can be built using an ML algorithm (such as neural networks) which uses the most relevant variables from each omics models (from Stage 3).”
“In Stage 2, individual models are developed for each of the omics which are later integrated into a joint model in Stage 3.”
mRNA is classified as a microRNA despite being defined as messenger RNA
MinorThe paper expands mRNA as messenger RNA, but later places it within "microRNAs (mRNA and miRNA)."
“Similarly, transcriptomics is further classed into lncRNAs (long non-coding RNAs) and microRNAs (mRNA and miRNA).”
“mRNA (messenger ribo-nucleic acid)”
Citations
Cites
Items 201–360 of 360
Proteome-Scale Human Interactomics
Luck, K., Sheynkman, G., Zhang, I., & Vidal, M. (2017) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2017.02.006 · Cited by 142
Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials: explanation and elaboration
McShane, L. M., Cavenagh, M. M., Lively, T., Eberhard, D. A., Bigbee, W. L., Williams, P. M., Mesirov, J. P., Polley, M. C., Kim, K. Y., Tricoli, J. V., et al. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-220 · Cited by 141
Caffrey, M., & Hogan, J. (1992) · Chemistry and Physics of Lipids · doi:10.1016/0009-3084(92)90002-7 · Cited by 137
Predicting HIV drug resistance with neural networks
Drăghici, S., & Potter, R. B. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.98 · Cited by 137
Wang, H., He, P., Pan, H., long, J., Wang, J., Li, Z., Liu, H., Jiang, W., & Zheng, Z. (2018) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-018-0056-7 · Cited by 132
Bush, W. S., DUDEK, S. M., & Ritchie, M. D. (2008) · Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) · doi:10.1142/9789812836939_0035 · Cited by 131
Fast integration of heterogeneous data sources for predicting gene function with limited annotation
Mostafavi, S., & Morris, Q. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq262 · Cited by 131
Designing and interpreting ‘multi-omic’ experiments that may change our understanding of biology
Haas, R., Zelezniak, A., Iacovacci, J., Kamrad, S., Townsend, S., & Ralser, M. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.08.009 · Cited by 131
Large-scale benchmark study of survival prediction methods using multi-omics data
Herrmann, M., Probst, P., Hornung, R., Jurinović, V., & Boulesteix, A. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa167 · Cited by 131
Unsupervised topological alignment for single-cell multi-omics integration
Cao, K., Bai, X., Hong, Y., & Wan, L. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa443 · Cited by 130
Pathway and network analysis in proteomics
Wu, X., Hasan, M. A., & Chen, J. Y. (2014) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.031 · Cited by 128
Costantino, S., Libby, P., Kishore, R., Tardif, J., El‐Osta, A., & Paneni, F. (2017) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx568 · Cited by 128
Johnson, J. W. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17798-0 · Cited by 124
Archer, D. B., Bricker, J. T., Chu, W. T., Burciu, R. G., McCracken, J. L., Lai, S., Coombes, S. A., Fang, R., Barmpoutis, A., Corcos, D. M., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30105-0 · Cited by 124
Towards precision medicine: advances in computational approaches for the analysis of human variants
Peterson, T. A., Doughty, E., & Kann, M. G. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.08.008 · Cited by 123
Xu, J., Wu, P., Chen, Y., Meng, Q., Dawood, H., & Dawood, H. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3116-7 · Cited by 123
Prognostic and predictive markers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Le, N. N. H., Sund, M., Vinci, A., Beyer, G., Javed, M., Krug, S., Neessee, A., & Schober, M. (2015) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.001 · Cited by 122
Integration of omics: more than the sum of its parts
Buescher, J. M., & Driggers, E. M. (2016) · Cancer & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/s40170-016-0143-y · Cited by 119
Radiomics in head and neck cancer: from exploration to application
Wong, A. J., Kanwar, A., Mohamed, A., & Fuller, C. D. (2016) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2016.07.18 · Cited by 117
PRECISION MEDICINE - THE GOLDEN GATE FOR DETECTION, TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
Hampel, H. J., O’Bryant, S. E., Castrillo, J. I., Ritchie, C. W., Rojkova, K., Broich, K., Benda, N., Nisticò, R., Frank, R., Dubois, B., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2016.112 · Cited by 117
Prediction Modeling Methodology
Dankers, F. J. W. M., Traverso, A., Wee, L., & van Kuijk, S. M. J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99713-1_8 · Cited by 117
Graph-Based Semisupervised Learning
Culp, M. V., & Michailidis, G. C. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.70765 · Cited by 109
Integration of multi-omics data for prediction of phenotypic traits using random forest
Acharjee, A., Kloosterman, B., Visser, R. G. F., & Maliepaard, C. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1043-4 · Cited by 109
Complex integrated analysis of lncRNAs-miRNAs-mRNAs in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Li, S., Chen, X., Liu, X., Yu, Y., Pan, H., Haak, R., Schmidt, J., Ziebolz, D., & Schmalz, G. (2017) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.026 · Cited by 109
Multiview learning for understanding functional multiomics
Nguyen, N. D., & Wang, D. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007677 · Cited by 108
Data integration and predictive modeling methods for multi-omics datasets
Kim, M., & Tagkopoulos, I. (2017) · Molecular Omics · doi:10.1039/c7mo00051k · Cited by 106
Information Gain, Correlation and Support Vector Machines
Roobaert, D., Karakoulas, G. J., & Chawla, N. V. (2008) · Studies in fuzziness and soft computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_23 · Cited by 105
A structured overview of simultaneous component based data integration
Deun, K. V., Smilde, A. K., WERF, M. J. V. D., Kiers, H. A. L., & Mechelen, I. V. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-246 · Cited by 105
Carlomagno, N., Incollingo, P., Tammaro, V., Peluso, G., Rupealta, N., Chiacchio, G., Sotelo, M. L. S., Minieri, G., Pisani, A., Riccio, E., et al. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/7869802 · Cited by 105
Time to recurrence and survival in serous ovarian tumors predicted from integrated genomic profiles
Mankoo, P. K., Shen, R., Schultz, N., Levine, D. A., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024709 · Cited by 104
Molecular Diagnostics: Promises and Possibilities
Debnath, M., Prasad, G. B. K. S., & Bisen, P. S. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3261-4 · Cited by 101
Towards a standardized bioinformatics infrastructure for N- and O-glycomics
Rojas‐Macias, M. A., Mariethoz, J., Andersson, P., Jin, C., Venkatakrishnan, V., Aoki, N. P., Shinmachi, D., Ashwood, C., Madunić, K., Zhang, T., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11131-x · Cited by 101
Vasta, G. R., & Ahmed, H. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420006971 · Cited by 99
Bioinformatic methods in NMR-based metabolic profiling
Ebbels, T. M. D., & Cavill, R. (2009) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2009.07.003 · Cited by 98
Integrative multi-omics module network inference with lemon-tree
Bonnet, E., Calzone, L., & Michoel, T. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003983 · Cited by 98
Patient-specific data fusion defines prognostic cancer subtypes
Yuan, Y., Savage, R. S., & Markowetz, F. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002227 · Cited by 97
Acharjee, A., Kloosterman, B., de Vos, R. C. H., Werij, J. S., Bachem, C., Visser, R. G. F., & Maliepaard, C. A. (2011) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.03.050 · Cited by 97
Canuel, V., Rance, B., Avillach, P., Degoulet, P., & Burgun, A. (2015) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbu006 · Cited by 97
Beer, Bethesda, and Biology: How “Genomics” Came Into Being
Kuska, B. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.2.93 · Cited by 96
Methylomics of gene expression in human monocytes
Liu, Y., Ding, J., Reynolds, L. M., Lohman, K., Register, T. C., de la Fuente, A., Howard, T. D., Hawkins, G., Cui, W., Morris, J., et al. (2013) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt356 · Cited by 96
Watt, J. M., Borhani, R., & Katsaggelos, A. K. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316402276 · Cited by 96
Singhal, A., Simmons, M., & Lu, Z. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005017 · Cited by 96
Kim, D., Joung, J., Sohn, K.-A., Shin, H., Park, Y. R., Ritchie, M. D., & Kim, J. H. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002481 · Cited by 95
Lee, T.-Y., Huang, K.-Y., Chuang, C.-H., Lee, C.-Y., & Chang, T.-H. (2020) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107277 · Cited by 95
Sakr, S., Elshawi, R., Ahmed, A. M., Qureshi, W., Brawner, C. A., Keteyian, S. J., Blaha, M. J., & Al-Mallah, M. H. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0566-6 · Cited by 92
Barh, D., Tiwari, S., Weener, M. E., Azevedo, V., Góes-Neto, A., Gromiha, M. M., & Ghosh, P. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104051 · Cited by 90
Deep learning-based ovarian cancer subtypes identification using multi-omics data
Guo, L.-Y., Wu, A.-H., Wang, Y.-X., Zhang, L.-P., Chai, H., & Liang, X.-F. (2020) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/s13040-020-00222-x · Cited by 89
López Pineda, A., Ye, Y., Visweswaran, S., Cooper, G. F., Wagner, M. M., & Tsui, F. (. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.019 · Cited by 88
Bowd, C., Medeiros, F. A., Zhang, Z., Zangwill, L. M., Hao, J., Lee, T.-W., B, T. J. S. A., Weinreb, R. N., & Goldbaum, M. H. (2005) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-1122 · Cited by 88
Computational drug repositioning for rare diseases in the era of precision medicine
Delavan, B., Roberts, R. A., Huang, R., Bao, W., Tong, W., & Liu, Z. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.10.009 · Cited by 88
Statistical workflow for feature selection in human metabolomics data
Antonelli, J., Claggett, B. L., Henglin, M., Kim, A., Ovsak, G., Kim, N., Deng, K., Rao, K., Tyagi, O., Watrous, J. D., et al. (2019) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo9070143 · Cited by 88
Machine learning vs. classic statistics for the prediction of IVF outcomes
Barnett‐Itzhaki, Z., Elbaz, M., Butterman, R., Amar, D., Amitay, M., Racowsky, C., Orvieto, R., Hauser, R. B., Baccarelli, A., & Machtinger, R. (2020) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-020-01908-1 · Cited by 85
Bayesian joint analysis of heterogeneous genomics data
Ray, P., Zheng, L., Lucas, J., & Carin, L. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu064 · Cited by 84
Integrative network analysis of TCGA data for ovarian cancer
Zhang, Q., Burdette, J. E., & Wang, J.-P. (2014) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/s12918-014-0136-9 · Cited by 80
A pathway-based data integration framework for prediction of disease progression
Seoane, J. A., Day, I. N. M., Gaunt, T. R., & Campbell, C. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt610 · Cited by 80
RAMPAGE: Promoter Activity Profiling by Paired-End Sequencing of 5′-Complete cDNAs
Batut, P. J., & Gingeras, T. (2013) · Current Protocols in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb25b11s104 · Cited by 79
Fan, Y., Murphy, T. B., Byrne, J. C., Brennan, L., Fitzpatrick, J. M., & Watson, R. W. G. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr1011069 · Cited by 77
Foster, J. M., Moreno, P. A., Fabregat, A., Hermjakob, H., Steinbeck, C., Apweiler, R., Wakelam, M. J. O., & Vizcaíno, J. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061951 · Cited by 76
Classification of Breast Cancer Subtypes by combining Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Data
List, M., Hauschild, A.-C., Tan, Q., Kruse, T. A., Baumbach, J., & Batra, R. (2014) · Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics · doi:10.1515/jib-2014-236 · Cited by 76
Lifestyle precision medicine: the next generation in type 2 diabetes prevention?
Mutie, P. M., Giordano, G. N., & Franks, P. W. (2017) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0938-x · Cited by 75
Campbell, M. P., Nguyen‐Khuong, T., Hayes, C. A., Flowers, S. A., Alagesan, K., Kolarich, D., Packer, N. H., & Karlsson, N. G. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.04.018 · Cited by 74
Watanabe, K., Yasugi, E., & Oshima, M. (2000) · Trends in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology · doi:10.4052/tigg.12.175 · Cited by 72
Boellner, S., & Becker, K. (2015) · Microarrays · doi:10.3390/microarrays4020098 · Cited by 71
Pathway-Guided Deep Neural Network toward Interpretable and Predictive Modeling of Drug Sensitivity
Deng, L., Cai, Y., Zhang, W., Yang, W., Gao, B., & Liu, H. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00331 · Cited by 71
Sathyanarayanan, A., Gupta, R., Thompson, E. W., Nyholt, D. R., Bauer, D. C., & Nagaraj, S. H. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz121 · Cited by 70
Pharmacogenomics: a systems approach
Wang, L. (2009) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.42 · Cited by 69
Seal, D. B., Das, V., Goswami, S., & De, R. K. (2020) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.03.021 · Cited by 69
Garali, I., Adanyeguh, I. M., Ichou, F., Perlbarg, V., Seyer, A., Colsch, B., Moszer, I., Guillemot, V., Durr, A., Mochel, F., et al. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx060 · Cited by 68
Zhang, Y., Wang, B., Jin, W., Wen, Y., Nan, L., Yang, M., Liu, R., Zhu, Y., Wang, C., Huang, L., et al. (2018) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2018.10.015 · Cited by 64
Chung, R., & Kang, C.-Y. (2019) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giz045 · Cited by 64
Zierer, J., Pallister, T., Tsai, P.-C., Krumsiek, J., Bell, J. T., Lauc, G., Spector, T. D., Menni, C., & Kastenmüller, G. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37646 · Cited by 63
Integrative Analysis of Omics Big Data
Yu, X., & Zeng, T. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_7 · Cited by 63
A filter-based feature selection approach for identifying potential biomarkers for lung cancer
Lee, I., Lushington, G. H., & Visvanathan, M. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/2043-9113-1-11 · Cited by 62
Data mining The Cancer Genome Atlas in the era of precision cancer medicine
Cheng, P. F., Dummer, R., & Levesque, M. P. (2015) · Swiss Medical Weekly · doi:10.4414/smw.2015.14183 · Cited by 61
A practical data processing workflow for multi-OMICS projects
Kohl, M., Megger, D. A., Trippler, M., Meckel, H., Ahrens, M., Bracht, T., Weber, F., Hoffmann, A.-C., Baba, H. A., Sitek, B., et al. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.029 · Cited by 60
Graph sharpening plus graph integration: a synergy that improves protein functional classification
Shin, H., Lisewski, A. M., & Lichtarge, O. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm511 · Cited by 59
Breast Imaging in the Era of Big Data: Structured Reporting and Data Mining
Margolies, L. R., Pandey, G. S., Horowitz, E. R., & Mendelson, D. S. (2015) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15396 · Cited by 58
Li, T., Wu, H., & Wang, M. D. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.008 · Cited by 55
ATHENA: the analysis tool for heritable and environmental network associations
Holzinger, E. R., Dudek, S. M., Frase, A. T., Pendergrass, S. A., & Ritchie, M. D. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt572 · Cited by 54
Molecular Predictors of Long-Term Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Lu, J., Cowperthwaite, M. C., Burnett, M. G., & Shpak, M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154313 · Cited by 53
A deep learning framework for hybrid heterogeneous transfer learning
Zhou, J. T., Pan, S. J., & Tsang, I. W. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.001 · Cited by 53
Li, Q., Freeman, L. M., Rush, J. E., Huggins, G. S., Kennedy, A. D., Labuda, J. A., Laflamme, D. P., & Hannah, S. S. (2015) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2015.0057 · Cited by 52
Auslander, N., Yizhak, K., Weinstock, A., Budhu, A., Tang, W., Wang, X. W., Ambs, S., & Ruppin, E. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep29662 · Cited by 50
Computational identification of multi-omic correlates of anticancer therapeutic response
Stetson, L. C., Pearl, T., Chen, Y., & Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-s7-s2 · Cited by 49
Asthma Biomarkers: Do They Bring Precision Medicine Closer to the Clinic?
Agache, I. O., & Rogozea, L. M. (2017) · Allergy Asthma and Immunology Research · doi:10.4168/aair.2017.9.6.466 · Cited by 48
Deep Learning data integration for better risk stratification models of bladder cancer.
Poirion, O., Chaudhary, K., & Garmire, L. X. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 48
Kwon, M.-S., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Namkung, J., Yun, T., Yi, S. G., Han, S., Kang, M., Kim, S. W., Jang, J.-Y., et al. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-16-s9-s4 · Cited by 47
LipidPedia: a comprehensive lipid knowledgebase
Kuo, T.-C., & Tseng, Y. J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty213 · Cited by 46
Alidjinou, E. K., Deldalle, J., Hallaert, C., Robineau, O., Ajana, F., Choisy, P., Hober, D., & Bocket, L. (2017) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx232 · Cited by 44
Kirchebner, J., Günther, M. P., Sonnweber, M., King, A., & Lau, S. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02612-1 · Cited by 44
Consistency and overfitting of multi-omics methods on experimental data
McCabe, S., Lin, D. Y., & Love, M. I. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz070 · Cited by 43
Combining Machine Learning and Metabolomics to Identify Weight Gain Biomarkers
Dias-Audibert, F. L., Navarro, L. C., de Oliveira, D. N., Delafiori, J., Melo, C. F. O. R., Guerreiro, T. M., Rosa, F. T., Petenuci, D. L., Watanabe, M. A. E., Velloso, L. A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00006 · Cited by 43
A Bayesian Integrative Genomic Model for Pathway Analysis of Complex Traits
Fridley, B. L., Lund, S., Jenkins, G. D., & Wang, L. (2012) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.21628 · Cited by 42
Multi-omics integration for neuroblastoma clinical endpoint prediction
Francescatto, M., Chierici, M., Dezfooli, S. R., Zandonà, A., Jurman, G., & Furlanello, C. (2018) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/s13062-018-0207-8 · Cited by 41
Plasma proteome and metabolome characterization of an experimental human thyrotoxicosis model
Pietzner, M., Engelmann, B., Kacprowski, T., Golchert, J., Dirk, A.-L., Hammer, E., Iwen, K. A., Nauck, M., Wallaschofski, H., Führer, D., et al. (2017) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0770-8 · Cited by 40
Health Informatics via Machine Learning for the Clinical Management of Patients
Niehaus, K. E., Charlton, P. H., Colopy, G. W., & Clifton, D. A. (2015) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.15265/iy-2015-014 · Cited by 39
Systems and precision medicine approaches to diabetes heterogeneity: a Big Data perspective
Capobianco, E. (2017) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s40169-017-0155-4 · Cited by 39
Genomics and Precision Medicine for Clinicians and Scientists in Hypertension
Dominiczak, A. F., Delles, C., & Padmanabhan, S. (2017) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.08252 · Cited by 38
Twenty-First Century Precision Medicine in Oncology: Genomic Profiling in Patients With Cancer
Borad, M. J., & LoRusso, P. M. (2017) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.08.002 · Cited by 38
A multi-omics supervised autoencoder for pan-cancer clinical outcome endpoints prediction
Tan, K., Huang, W., Hu, J., & Dong, S. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1114-3 · Cited by 38
Mandel, S. A., Morelli, M., Halperin, I. J. Y., & Korczyn, A. D. (2010) · The EPMA Journal · doi:10.1007/s13167-010-0036-z · Cited by 36
Vogel and Motulsky's human genetics--problems and approaches
Kango-Singh, M. (2010) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/1479-7364-5-1-73 · Cited by 35
Yan, K. K., Zhao, H., & Pang, H. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1982-4 · Cited by 34
Vogel and Motulsky's Human Genetics: Problems and Approaches
Vogel, F., Motulsky, A. G., Speicher, M. R., Motulsky, A. G., & Antonarakis, S. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 33
Wu, C.-C., Asgharzadeh, S., Triche, T. J., & D’Argenio, D. Z. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq044 · Cited by 33
Benefits and barriers in the design of harmonized access agreements for international data sharing
Saulnier, K. M., Bujold, D., Dyke, S. O. M., Dupras, C., Beck, S., Bourque, G., & Joly, Y. (2019) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0310-4 · Cited by 32
Milward, E. A., Shahandeh, A., Heidari, M., Johnstone, D. M., Daneshi, N., & Hondermarck, H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394447-4.40029-5 · Cited by 32
Machine learning and graph analytics in computational biomedicine
Zou, Q., Chen, L., Huang, T., Zhang, Z., & Xu, Y. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.09.003 · Cited by 31
Classification of Breast Cancer Subtypes by combining Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Data
List, M., Hauschild, A.-C., Tan, Q., et al. (2014) · PubMed · doi:10.2390/biecoll-jib-2014-236 · Cited by 31
Taskesen, E., Babaei, S., Reinders, M. M., & de Ridder, J. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-16-s4-s5 · Cited by 30
A collaborative approach to develop a multi-omics data analytics platform for translational research
Schumacher, A., Rujan, T., & Hoefkens, J. (2014) · Applied & Translational Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.atg.2014.09.010 · Cited by 28
Hubshman, M. W., Broekman, S., van Wijk, E., Cremers, F. P. M., Abu-Diab, A., Khateb, S., Tzur, S., Lagovsky, I., Smirin‐Yosef, P., Sharon, D., et al. (2017) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddx428 · Cited by 28
Proteome research : concepts, technology and application
Wilkins, M. R. (2007) · Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72910-5 · Cited by 27
Bjerrum, J. T., Rantalainen, M., Wang, Y., Olsen, J., & Nielsen, O. H. (2013) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-013-0580-3 · Cited by 27
A System for Accessible Artificial Intelligence
Olson, R. S., Sipper, M., Cava, W. L., Tartarone, S., Vitale, S., Fu, W., Orzechowski, P., Urbanowicz, R. J., Holmes, J. H., & Moore, J. H. (2018) · Genetic and evolutionary computation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90512-9_8 · Cited by 27
Implementing ReliefF filters to extract meaningful features from genetic lifetime datasets
Beretta, L., & Santaniello, A. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.12.003 · Cited by 26
Precision medicine ― A promising, yet challenging road lies ahead
Malod‐Dognin, N., Petschnigg, J., & Pržulj, N. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.10.003 · Cited by 26
de Andrade, B. M., de Gois, J. S., Xavier, V. L., & Luna, A. S. (2020) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104013 · Cited by 26
Giang, T.-T., Nguyen, T.-P., & Tran, D.-H. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01140-y · Cited by 26
Cancer survival classification using integrated data sets and intermediate information
Kim, S., Park, T., & Kon, M. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2014.06.003 · Cited by 25
Tumour biomarkers: diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive:
Shaw, A., Bradley, M. D., Elyan, S., & Kurian, K. M. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h3449 · Cited by 25
Lee, G., Bang, L., Kim, S. Y., Kim, D., & Sohn, K.-A. (2017) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12920-017-0268-z · Cited by 25
Yan, Z. P., Xiong, Y., Xu, W., Li, M., Cheng, Y., Chen, F., Ding, S., Xu, H., & Zheng, G. (2012) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2012.1637 · Cited by 24
Breast Cancer Prognostics Using Multi-Omics Data.
Ma, S., Ren, J., & Fenyö, D. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 23
Investigation of machine learning techniques on proteomics: A comprehensive survey
Sonsare, P. M., & Gunavathi, C. (2019) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.09.004 · Cited by 23
Examining the architecture of cellular computing through a comparative study with a computer
Wang, D., & Gribskov, M. (2005) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0038 · Cited by 21
Lévesque, E., Kirby, E., Bolt, I. L. L. E., Knoppers, B. M., de Beaufort, I., Pashayan, N., & Widschwendter, M. (2018) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000492663 · Cited by 21
Shin, H., Hill, N. J., Lisewski, A. M., & Park, J. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.050 · Cited by 19
D'Onofrio, D. J., & An, G. C. (2010) · Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling · doi:10.1186/1742-4682-7-3 · Cited by 18
A formal concept analysis approach to consensus clustering of multi-experiment expression data
Hristoskova, A., Boeva, V., & Tsiporkova, E. (2014) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-151 · Cited by 18
Visualizing omics and clinical data: Which challenges for dealing with their variety?
Fleur Mougin, A., Auber, D., Bourqui, R., Diallo, G., Dutour, I., Jouhet, V., Thiessard, F., Thiébaut, R., & Thébault, P. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.08.012 · Cited by 18
Kim, A. A., Rachid Zaim, S., & Subbian, V. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104148 · Cited by 18
Can machine-learning algorithms replace conventional statistics?
Hung, A. J. (2019) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/bju.14542 · Cited by 17
Hierarchical Classification of Cancers of Unknown Primary Using Multi-Omics Data
Haghighi, E. B., Knudsen, M., Laursen, B. E., & Besenbacher, S. (2019) · Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1177/1176935119872163 · Cited by 17
Breakthroughs in genomics data integration for predicting clinical outcome
Lussier, Y. A., & Li, H. (2012) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2012.10.003 · Cited by 15
Li, W., Zhang, A., Zhou, X., Yang, N., Liu, Q., Sun, H. J., Fang, H., & Wang, X. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c9ra07621b · Cited by 15
Bayesian Framework for Detecting Gene Expression Outliers in Individual Samples
Vivian, J., Eizenga, J. M., Beale, H. C., Vaske, O. M., & Paten, B. (2020) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.19.00095 · Cited by 15
Nitric oxide synthase 2A (NOS2A) polymorphisms are not associated with invasive pneumococcal disease
Payton, A., Payne, D., Mankhambo, L., Banda, D. L., Hart, C. A., Ollier, W., & Carrol, E. D. (2009) · BMC Medical Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2350-10-28 · Cited by 14
MicroRNA-mRNA interaction network using TSK-type recurrent neural fuzzy network
Vineetha, S., Chandra Shekara Bhat, C., & Idicula, S. M. (2013) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.063 · Cited by 14
Chen, Y., Wang, X., Wang, G., Li, Z., Wang, J., Huang, L., Qin, Z., Yuan, X., Cheng, Z., Zhang, S., et al. (2017) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c6mb00653a · Cited by 14
Barnes, J. W., Tonelli, A. R., Heresi, G. A., Newman, J. E., Mellor, N. E., Grove, D., & Dweik, R. A. (2016) · Pulmonary Circulation · doi:10.1086/688847 · Cited by 13
Semi-supervised learning through adaptive Laplacian graph trimming
Yue, Z., Meng, D., He, J., & Zhang, G. (2016) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2016.11.013 · Cited by 12
Current Advances and Limitations of Deep Learning in Anticancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction
Xian, T., Yu, Y., Duan, K., Zhang, J., Sun, P., & Sun, H. (2020) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026620666200710101307 · Cited by 12
Network-constrained forest for regularized classification of omics data
Anděl, M., Kléma, J., & Krejčík, Z. (2015) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.006 · Cited by 10
The road to precision medicine in asthma
Hanania, N. A., & Diamant, Z. (2017) · Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1097/mcp.0000000000000444 · Cited by 9
Machine Learning in Multi-Omics Data to Assess Longitudinal Predictors of Glycaemic HealthPreprint
Prélot, L., Draisma, H. H. M., Anasanti, M. D., Balkhiyarova, Z., Wielscher, M., Yengo, L., Balkau, B., Roussel, R., Sebert, S., Ala-Korpela, M., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/358390 · Cited by 9
Glaves, J. P., Li, M. X., Mercier, P., Fahlman, R. P., & Sykes, B. D. (2014) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-014-0678-2 · Cited by 8
Wilkins, M. R., & Appel, R. D. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72910-5_1 · Cited by 7
The potential of Precision Medicine
Kalaitzopoulos, D. (2016) · European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nhtm.2016.05.001 · Cited by 7
Tepeli, Y. I., Ünal, A. B., Akdemir, F. M., & Taştan, Ö. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/834168 · Cited by 7
Multi-omics Data and Analytics Integration in Ovarian Cancer
Bhardwaj, A., & Steen, K. V. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_29 · Cited by 7
Modern Machine Learning Techniques and Their Applications to Medical Diagnostics
Gammerman, A. (2010) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16239-8_2 · Cited by 6
Gibson, G. C. (2014) · Cited by 6
Advancing precision medicine through multi-omics: An integrated approach to tumor profiling
Martinelli, G., & Foreman, N. K. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.349.6253.1246-c · Cited by 5
Molecular Signature for Lymphatic Invasion Associated with Survival of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Paik, E. S., Choi, H. J., Kim, T., Lee, J., Kim, B.-G., Bae, D., & Choi, C. H. (2017) · Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.4143/crt.2017.104 · Cited by 5
Building bridges from “omics” to cell biology
Cox, B. (2009) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-305 · Cited by 4
PART of the WHOLE: A Case Study in Wellness-Oriented Personalized Medicine.
Gibson, G. C., Marigorta, U. M., Ojagbeghru, E. R., & Park, S. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 4
Dimitrakopoulos, G. Ν., Dimitrakopoulou, K., Maraziotis, I. A., Sgarbas, K., & Bezerianos, A. (2014) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2014.6943593 · Cited by 4
Biostatistics, Data Mining and Computational Modeling
He, H., Lin, D., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.-P., & Deng, H. (2016) · Translational bioinformatics · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7543-4_2 · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 363 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Clarivate Analytics, 2020, Web of science [v.5.35] - web of science core collection basic search [WWW Document], Web Sci.
- Tipping, 2001, Sparse bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 1, 211
- Wang, 2020, MORONET: multi-omics integration via graph convolutional networks for biomedical data classification, bioRxiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads
Paolicelli, R. C., Sierra, A., Stevens, B., Tremblay, M.-E., Aguzzi, A., Ajami, B., Amit, I., Audinat, E., Bechmann, I., Bennett, M., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020 · Cited by 1,973
Applications of multi‐omics analysis in human diseases
Chen, C., Wang, J., Pan, D., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Yan, J., Wang, L., Yang, X., Yang, M., & Liu, G. (2023) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.315 · Cited by 545
AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology
Holzinger, A., Keiblinger, K., Holub, P., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2023) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001 · Cited by 438
Machine learning for multi-omics data integration in cancer
Cai, Z., Poulos, R. C., Liu, J., & Zhong, Q. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103798 · Cited by 366
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: deciphering brain complexity in health and disease
Piwecka, M., Rajewsky, N., & Rybak-Wolf, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00809-y · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Reel, P. S., Reel, S., Pearson, E., Trucco, E., & Jefferson, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jefferson, Emily
- Venue
- Biotechnology Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 107739
- ISSN
- 0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139601120
- Semantic Scholar
- adb2c80911fbb5c273279afa79f6a766700a1040
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 363
- Citations by year
- 2026: 186 · 2025: 239 · 2024: 227 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 14
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biotechnology Advances (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020
- University of Dundee (16/136/102)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (633983)
- National Institute for Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- multi-omics integration, machine learning, biomarker discovery, disease prediction, patient stratification, precision medicine, systems biology, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, predictive algorithms
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Proteomics, Systems Biology, Metabolomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
