Cited by 242Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersT-cell and B-cell Immunology

An intestinal organ culture system uncovers a role for the nervous system in microbe-immune crosstalk

Open access
Yissachar, Nissan, Zhou, Yan, Ung, Lloyd, Lai, Nicole Y., Mohan, James F., Ehrlicher, Allen, Weitz, David A., Kasper, Dennis L. +3 more·2017·Cell

Abstract

Investigation of host-environment interactions in the gut would benefit from a culture system that maintained tissue architecture yet allowed tight experimental control. We devised a microfabricated organ culture system that viably preserves the normal multicellular composition of the mouse intestine, with luminal flow to control perturbations (e.g., microbes, drugs). It enables studying short-term responses of diverse gut components (immune, neuronal, etc.). We focused on the early response to bacteria that induce either Th17 or RORg+ T-regulatory (Treg) cells in vivo. Transcriptional responses partially reproduced in vivo signatures, but these microbes elicited diametrically opposite changes in expression of a neuronal-specific gene set, notably nociceptive neuropeptides. We demonstrated activation of sensory neurons by microbes, correlating with RORg+ Treg induction. Colonic RORg+ Treg frequencies increased in mice lacking TAC1 neuropeptide precursor and decreased in capsaicin-diet fed mice. Thus, differential engagement of the enteric nervous system may partake in bifurcating pro- or anti-inflammatory responses to microbes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro intestine models created using human fetal intestinal tissue explants deteriorate within 24 hours of culture.

    “In vitro intestine models have been created using human fetal intestinal tissue explants, but they deteriorate within 24 hours of culture.45, 46”

    From Microfluidic Organ-on-a-Chip Models of Human Intestine (2018) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Results section describes intestinal cultures from prenatal and young mice, not human fetal tissue, and reports that they remained viable during the culture period; some epithelial degradation appeared in cultures continued longer than 24 hours. The Discussion says the system cannot be used with human organs and places clear structural problems at 30–40 hours. These findings contradict the attributed species and timing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Yissachar et al. found that their microfluidics-based system could reliably reproduce observations previously made in vivo.

    “They found that previous observations made in vivo could be robustly reproduced, while being able to extract compelling new insights due to the tightly controlled nature of their system (Yissachar et al., 2017).”
  • Yissachar et al. developed a highly functional, microfluidics-based intestinal organ culture system.

    “Yissachar et al. recently reported the development of a highly functional, microfluidics-based intestinal organ culture system.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yissachar, N., Zhou, Y., Ung, L., Lai, N. Y., Mohan, J. F., Ehrlicher, A., Weitz, D. A., Kasper, D. L., Chiu, I. M., Mathis, D., & Benoist, C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chiu, Isaac M.
  • Mathis, Diane
  • Benoist, Christophe
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
168
Issue
6
Pages
1135-1148.e12
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592427302
Cited by
242
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 16
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Sponsored Research Agreement
  • UCB
  • JPB Foundation
  • Howalt family
  • NIH (R37-AI051530, DP2AT009499)
  • Harvard Digestive Disease Center
  • Schuyler Pierce Memorial Fellowship
  • JDRF (3-2014-216)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
enteric nervous system, gut microbiota, host-microbe interactions, Th17 cells, sensory neurons, TAC1, capsaicin, inflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Clostridium, Intestines, Organ Culture Techniques, Symbiosis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review