Development of an Inactivated Vaccine Candidate, BBIBP-CorV, with Potent Protection against SARS-CoV-2
Open accessAbstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) threatens global public health. The development of a vaccine is urgently needed for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Here, we report the pilot-scale production of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate (BBIBP-CorV) that induces high levels of neutralizing antibodies titers in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and nonhuman primates (cynomolgus monkeys and rhesus macaques) to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2. Two-dose immunizations using 2 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV provided highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 intratracheal challenge in rhesus macaques, without detectable antibody-dependent enhancement of infection. In addition, BBIBP-CorV exhibits efficient productivity and good genetic stability for vaccine manufacture. These results support the further evaluation of BBIBP-CorV in a clinical trial.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
BBIBP-CorV is an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate that induced neutralizing antibodies across six mammalian species and protected rhesus macaques against intratracheal SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Two-dose immunization with 2 μg/dose provided highly efficient protection without detectable antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.
Key findings
- The HB02 strain was selected for BBIBP-CorV; it reached peak titers over 7.0 log10 CCID50 at 48–72 hpi in Vero cells, and the P10 stock showed >99.95% whole-genome sequence homology to HB02 with no amino acid variation.
- BBIBP-CorV induced 100% seroconversion in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and nonhuman primates; in rhesus macaques before challenge, geometric mean neutralizing antibody titers were 215 in the 2 μg/dose group and 256 in the 8 μg/dose group.
- After intratracheal challenge, low-dose macaques had throat viral load peak at 5.33 log10 copies/mL at 5 dpi and fall to 1.12 log10 copies/mL at 7 dpi; all high-dose macaques had negative throat swabs, and no macaque in either vaccinated group had detectable viral load in any lung lobe.
- Safety studies reported a rat maximum tolerated dose of 24 μg/rat, equivalent to 900 times the human dose, and a no observed adverse effect level of 8 μg/dose in cynomolgus monkeys; no ADE was observed in vaccinated macaques.
Methods
- Three SARS-CoV-2 strains were isolated from patient bronchoalveolar lavage or throat swabs; HB02 was adapted in Vero cells, produced in a basket reactor, inactivated with β-propiolactone at 1:4,000 at 2°C–8°C, and formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.
- Immunogenicity was tested in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and cynomolgus monkeys with 2, 4, or 8 μg/dose using one-, two-, or three-dose regimens; neutralizing antibody levels were measured by microtitration CPE assay.
- Rhesus macaques received two intramuscular immunizations on days 0 and 14 with placebo (n = 2), 2 μg/dose (n = 4), or 8 μg/dose (n = 4), then were intratracheally challenged with 10^6 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2 on day 24; viral loads were measured by RT-PCR in throat and anal swabs and lung lobes, with histopathology at 7 dpi.
Limitations
- The paper states that protection effects on the upper respiratory tract were not assessed and warrant further evaluation.
- Evident from the text: this is preclinical animal data only; clinical efficacy and human safety were not yet established, with Phase I in progress and Phase II recently initiated.
- Evident from the text: nonhuman primate challenge groups were small (n = 2 placebo; n = 4 per vaccinated group) and follow-up after challenge was short (euthanasia at 7 dpi), limiting assessment of durability and late outcomes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 10 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Inoculation with BBIBP-CorV does not result in side effects on serum biochemical parameters in rhesus macaques.
“Because a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection does not affect host blood chemistry (Munster et al., 2020), this result suggests that inoculation with BBIBP-CorV does not result in side effects on serum biochemical parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Munster et al., 2020 source
- Findingown data
All placebo rhesus macaques showed and maintained a high viral load during the whole evaluation period after virus challenge by both throat and anal swabs.
“All placebo macaques showed and maintained a high viral load during the whole evaluation period after virus challenge by both throat and anal swabs (Figures 3D and 3E; Figures S4B and S4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In mice, the D0/D21 interval obtained the highest NAb level at 7 days after the second immunization among the two-dose programs.
“Moreover, use of the D0/D21 interval obtained the highest NAb level at 7 days after the second immunization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In rhesus macaques, serum biochemical parameters after vaccination and challenge with living virus remained constant.
“Moreover, the serum biochemical parameters in rhesus macaques after vaccination and challenge with living virus remained constant (Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In mice, the three-dose (D0/D7/D14) immunization program resulted in higher NAb levels than the one-dose (D0) program in all three dose groups at day 28.
“The results showed that the three-dose (D0/D7/D14) immunization program resulted in higher NAb levels than the one-dose (D0) program in all three groups at days 28 (Figures 2A and 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
BBIBP-CorV vaccination in rhesus macaques is not associated with detectable antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.
“without detectable antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
- Also stated in: § Protection in a Nonhuman Primate Animal Model · plain
“without observed antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“without observable ADE or immunopathological exacerbation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Absence of detectable antibody-dependent enhancement in rhesus macaques indicates absence of ADE in humans.
- Also stated in: § Protection in a Nonhuman Primate Animal Model · plain
- Findingown data
Before virus challenge at D24, the geometric mean titer of NAb in rhesus macaques was 215 in the low-dose (2 μg/dose) group and 256 in the high-dose (8 μg/dose) group.
“Before virus challenge at D24, the geometric mean titer of NAb in the low-dose and high-dose groups reached 215 and 256, respectively (Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No amino acid variation was found in the full sequence, including the position near the furin cleavage site, in the P10 stock.
“Furthermore, no amino acid variation was found in the full sequence, including the position near the furin cleavage site, in the P10 stock.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No histopathologic changes were observed in rats after euthanasia.
“No histopathologic changes were observed after euthanasia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, and mice, one-dose immunization with 2, 4, or 8 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV resulted in 100% seroconversion at day 21 after immunization.
“The results demonstrated that BBIBP-CorV has good immunogenicity, and the seroconversion rate reached 100% at day 21 after immunization in all animal models (Figure 2E; Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The vaccine stock contained viral structural proteins (protective antigens).
“Western blot analysis showed that the vaccine stock contained viral structural proteins (protective antigens) (Figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In mice, three-dose (D0/D7/D14) immunization with 2, 4, or 8 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV resulted in 100% seroconversion at day 7 after the first immunization.
“The NAb levels for all groups were determined at days 7, 14, 21, and 28, and the seroconversion rate in all three groups reached 100% at day 7 after the first immunization (Figure 2C; Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two-dose immunization with 2 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV provides highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 intratracheal challenge in rhesus macaques.
“Two-dose immunizations using 2 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV provided highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 intratracheal challenge in rhesus macaques, without detectable antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Two-dose immunization using 2 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV conferred highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques without observable ADE or immunopathological exacerbation.”
- Also stated in: § Protection in a Nonhuman Primate Animal Model · boosted
“Taken together, all these results demonstrated that both low-dose and high-dose BBIBP-CorV conferred highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 in macaques without observed antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The rhesus macaque intratracheal challenge model with 10^6 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2 reproduces human COVID-19 disease sufficiently to assess vaccine protection.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
BBIBP-CorV induces high levels of neutralizing antibodies in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, cynomolgus monkeys, and rhesus macaques.
“Here, we report the pilot-scale production of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate (BBIBP-CorV) that induces high levels of neutralizing antibodies titers in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and nonhuman primates (cynomolgus monkeys and rhesus macaques) to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Here, we report development of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate, BBIBP-CorV, and show that it induced high levels of neutralizing antibody in six mammalian species, including rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, cynomolgus monkeys, and rhesus macaques, protecting them against SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
In mice, two-dose immunization with 2, 4, or 8 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV using D0/D7, D0/D14, or D0/D21 intervals resulted in 100% seropositivity at 7 days after the second immunization.
“The seropositivity of the high-, medium-, and low-dose groups from all three immunization programs reached 100% at 7 days after the second immunization (Figure 2B; Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The throat swabs of all four macaques in the high-dose (8 μg/dose) group were negative for viral load.
“The throat swabs of all four macaques in the high-dose group were negative for viral load.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In mice, the immunogenicity of the two-dose immunization program was significantly higher than that of the one-dose immunization program in the high- and middle-dose groups.
“The immunogenicity of the two-dose immunization program was significantly higher than that of the one-dose immunization program in the high- and middle-dose groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All macaques that received vaccination showed normal lung with focal mild histopathological changes in few lobes.
“Furthermore, all macaques that received vaccination showed normal lung with focal mild histopathological changes in few lobes (Figure 3G)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main protective antigen (spike protein) of HB02 has 100% homology with other SARS-CoV-2 strains.
“and demonstrated that the main protective antigen (the spike protein) has 100% homology”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In cynomolgus monkeys, rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, and mice, three-dose (D0/D7/D14) immunization with 2, 4, or 8 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV resulted in 100% seroconversion at 21 days after immunization.
“The seroconversion rate reached 100% at 21 days after immunization in all animal models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BBIBP-CorV exhibits good genetic stability for vaccine manufacture.
“In addition, BBIBP-CorV exhibits efficient productivity and good genetic stability for vaccine manufacture.”
- Also stated in: § Vaccine Design and Production · hedged
“These results suggest the high genetic stability of the HB02 strain, which is beneficial for further development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Vaccine Design and Production · hedged
- Findingown data
The whole-genome sequence homology between the HB02 strain and the P10 stock is more than 99.95%.
“We sequenced the whole genome of the HB02 strain and the P10 stock by deep sequencing analysis, and the results showed that their sequence homology was more than 99.95%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the four macaques in the low-dose group, three showed a nondetectable viral load at 7 dpi.
“In particular, among the four macaques in the low-dose group, three showed a nondetectable viral load at 7 dpi.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In rabbit and guinea pig models, the immunogenicity of the three-dose (D0/D7/D14) program with high, middle, and low doses was higher than that of the one-dose (D0) program.
“the NAb levels at 21 days after the first immunization showed that the immunogenicity of the three-dose (D0/D7/D14) program with high, middle, and low doses was higher than that of the one-dose (D0) program in rabbit and guinea pig models (Figures 2E and 2F; Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No viral load was detected in the anal swabs of two out of four macaques in the high-dose group.
“Moreover, no viral load was detected in the anal swabs of two (out of four) macaques in the high-dose group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In rats, a single intramuscular injection of 24 μg/rat BBIBP-CorV caused no deaths, impending death, or obvious clinical signs over 14 consecutive days.
“No cases of death or impending death or obvious clinical signs were observed in any of the four groups over 14 consecutive days after vaccine inoculation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The HB02 strain is homologous to other SARS-CoV-2 strains from domestic and international sources.
“The comparisons on the whole-genome sequences of the HB02 strain and other SARS-CoV-2 strains from domestic and international sources showed that the HB02 strain is homologous to other viral strains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In mice, the immunogenicity of the three-dose (D0/D7/D14) immunization program was higher than that of both the one- and two-dose programs.
“The results showed that the immunogenicity of the three-dose (D0/D7/D14) immunization program was higher than that of both the one- and two-dose programs (Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In rhesus macaques, body temperatures of both vaccinated and placebo groups fluctuated within the normal range after virus challenge from 0 to 7 days postinoculation.
“Body temperatures of both the vaccinated groups and placebo group fluctuated within the normal range after virus challenge from 0 to 7 days postinoculation (dpi) (Figure 3C; Figure S4 A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In mice, in the high-dose group, a significant variation in NAb levels was observed only between 7 and 14 days.
“In the high-dose group, a significant variation only was observed between 7 and 14 days (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the development of BBIBP-CorV, the HB02 strain generated the highest virus yields in Vero cells among three candidate viral strains.
“In the development of BBIBP-CorV, the HB02 strain generated the highest virus yields in Vero cells among three candidate viral strains”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Viral RNAs were detected in throat or nasal swabs in all model groups.
“the viral RNAs were detected in throat or nasal swabs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No CPE was observed for three passages after inoculation of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 onto Vero cells.
“No CPE was observed for three passages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The HB02 strain had no amino acid variations within 10 passages.
“and had no amino acid variations within 10 passages”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In guinea pigs, no abnormal reactions were observed during the sensitization period by clinical observation and body weight measurement.
“The results showed no abnormal reactions during the sensitization period by clinical observation and measurement of the body weights of the guinea pigs (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In guinea pigs, the anaphylaxis of the positive control group was highly positive.
“The anaphylaxis of the positive control group was highly positive (1/6 animals were positive, 3/6 animals were strongly positive, and 2/6 animals were extremely positive).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In cynomolgus monkeys, no cases of death or impending death or significant abnormalities in clinical physiological and pathological indicators, lymphocyte subgroup distribution, cytokines, c-reactive protein, complement, or body weight were observed in the 2, 4, and 8 μg/dose groups.
“No cases of death or impending death or significant abnormalities in clinical physiological and pathological indicators, lymphocyte subgroup distribution (CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, CD20+, CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+), cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interferon [IFN]-γ, interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6), c-reactive protein, complement, or body weight were observed in the 2, 4, and 8 μ”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In guinea pigs, no allergic reaction symptoms were found in the negative control group or experimental group on D19 or D26.
“No allergic reaction symptoms were found in the negative control group or experimental group on D19 or D26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Pathological changes in lung tissues were observed in all model groups despite different challenge ways.
“Despite the different challenge ways, the pathological changes in lung tissues were observed in all model groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For BBIBP-CorV, all macaques in the low- and high-dose groups did not show detectable viral load in any lung lobe at 7 days after inoculation.
“but for BBIBP-CorV, all macaques in the low- and high-dose groups did not show a detectable viral load in any lung lobe at 7 days after inoculation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for a single intramuscular injection in rats was 24 μg/rat, equivalent to 900 times the dose in humans.
“Notably, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) used for a single intramuscular injection in rats was 24 μg/rat, which is equivalent to 900 times the dose in humans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two-dose immunizations using low-dose (2 μg/dose) of BBIBP-CorV provided highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques.
“Most importantly, two-dose immunizations using low-dose (2 μg/dose) of BBIBP-CorV provided highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In cynomolgus monkeys, no abnormalities in the gross anatomy of the euthanized animals in each dosed group on D25 and D36 were observed.
“No abnormalities in the gross anatomy of the euthanized animals in each dosed group on D25 and D36 were observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The three SARS-CoV-2 strains isolated (HB02, CQ01, QD01) cover the main SARS-CoV-2 populations.
“The three strains were 19nCoV-CDC-Tan-HB02 (HB02), 19nCoV-CDC-Tan-Strain03 (CQ01), and 19nCoV-CDC-Tan-Strain04 (QD01), which are scattered on the phylogenetic tree constructed from all available sequences, suggesting coverage of the main SARS-CoV-2 populations (Figure S1 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The 100% spike protein homology indicates potential broad protection against various SARS-CoV-2 strains.
“indicating potential broad protection against various SARS-CoV-2 strains (Figures S1 and S2 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The HB02 strain has high genetic stability.
“These results suggest the high genetic stability of the HB02 strain, which is beneficial for further development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The MTD result indicates potential good safety of BBIBP-CorV in humans.
“indicating the potential good safety of BBIBP-CorV in humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The immunogenicity and protective efficacy observed in animal models predict immunogenicity and protection in humans.
- Study design and conductown data
Effective inactivation of the virus was validated in a sample from each batch of BBIBP-CorV.
“Effective inactivation of the virus was validated in a sample from each batch of BBIBP-CorV.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The HB02 strain has good genetic stability.
“suggesting its good genetic stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The development of BBIBP-CorV provides a potential solution to the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The development of BBIBP-CorV provides a potential solution to the COVID-19 pandemic”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No effective antiviral drug against SARS-CoV-2 exists.
- Interpretationreasoning
The animal model for virus challenge was successfully established.
“indicating that the successful establishment of the animal model for virus challenge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- May combine two claims. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConcerns on immunogenicity and safety of DNA vaccines remain.
“however, the concerns on their immunogenicity and safety still remain (Gary and Weiner, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gary and Weiner, 2020 source
The Introduction (page not available) describes a highly consistent safety record, and the Clinical review of recent DNA vaccines (page not available) says all the constructs it reports were safe and immunogenic in clinical studies. Rather than stating that concerns about both properties still remain, the paper presents recent results as evidence of improved immunogenicity and tolerability. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNeutralizing antibody against the carrier vector virus is still a challenge for adenovirus-vectored vaccines.
“but the neutralizing antibody against the carrier vector virus is still a challenge (Zhang and Zhou, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang and Zhou, 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior to this study, three candidate vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were reported: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, a DNA vaccine, and PiCoVacc.
“Prior to our reporting of this BBIBP-CorV study, three candidate vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were reported, including an adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), a DNA vaccine, and an inactivated vaccine (PiCoVacc) (Gao et al., 2020, Lurie et al., 2020, van Doremalen et al., 2020, Yu et al., 2020a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe DNA vaccine is easy to produce and stable for storage with limited recovery or residual toxicity.
“The DNA vaccine is easy to be produced and is stable for storage with limited recovery or residual toxicity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gary and Weiner, 2020 source
The Introduction describes synthetic DNA vaccines as rapidly synthesized and scalable, and says the platform addresses goals of temperature stability and consistent manufacture. It also reports a consistent safety record, but does not establish the more specific claim of limited recovery or residual toxicity. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe recombinant adenovirus-vectored vaccine is easily manipulated for genetic modification and capable of inducing potent antigen-specific immune responses.
“The recombinant adenovirus-vectored vaccine is easily manipulated for genetic modification and capable of inducing potent antigen-specific immune responses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang and Zhou, 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenBBIBP-CorV exhibits efficient productivity for vaccine manufacture.
“In addition, BBIBP-CorV exhibits efficient productivity and good genetic stability for vaccine manufacture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 7 dpi, no macaques in the low-dose and high-dose groups had a detectable viral load in any lung lobe, which was significantly different from the placebo group.
“No macaques in the low-dose and high-dose groups had a detectable viral load in any lung lobe, which was significantly different from the results in the placebo group (Figure 3F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn mice, one-dose immunization with 2, 4, or 8 μg/dose of BBIBP-CorV resulted in 100% seroconversion at 7 days after immunization, and the immunization effect was time dependent.
“The results showed that the seroconversion rate in the high-, middle-, and low-dose groups reached 100% at 7 days after immunization, and the immunization effect was time dependent (Figure 2 A; Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOnly 3 of 7 sections of the lung lobes were detected to have infection in the placebo group.
“To note, only 3 of 7 sections of the lung lobes were detected to have infection in the placebo group, possibly because the virus infection in the lung lobes is dynamically changing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe P7 stock virus replicated efficiently and reached a peak titer over 7.0 log10 CCID50 by 48-72 h post-infection at MOI 0.01-0.3 in Vero cells.
“Growth kinetic analysis of the P7 stock in Vero cells showed that the stock virus could replicate efficiently and reached a peak titer over 7.0 log10 CCID50 by 48–72 h post-infection (hpi) at multiplicities of infection (MOI) of 0.01–0.3 (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 7 dpi, placebo-treated macaques produced low-level NAb with a titer of 1:16, whereas vaccinated macaques had NAb levels highest at 1:2,048 (average 1:860) in the high-dose group and 1:1,024 in the low-dose group (average 1:512).
“At 7 dpi, the macaques treated with placebo produced low-level NAb with a titer of 1:16, whereas the NAb levels of the vaccinated macaques were highest at 1:2,048 (average 1:860) in the high-dose group and 1:1,024 in the low-dose group (average 1:512) (Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the placebo group, a high viral load was detected in the left lower lung, right lower lung, and right accessory lung, and pathological histology showed severe interstitial pneumonia.
“In the placebo group, a high viral load was detected in the left lower lung, right lower lung, and right accessory lung, and the pathological histology analysis results showed severe interstitial pneumonia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe vaccine particles are oval with spikes and diameters of approximately 100 nm.
“A negatively stained electron microscopy image visualized oval viral particles with spikes with the diameters of approximately 100 nm (Figure 1F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn rats, there was no significant difference in weight or feeding state between the BBIBP-CorV and control groups.
“Moreover, there was no significant difference in weight or feeding state between the experimental groups and control groups (Figure 4 A; Figure S4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the low-dose (2 μg/dose) rhesus macaque group, viral load in throat swabs peaked at 5.33 log10 copies/mL at 5 dpi and decreased to 1.12 log10 copies/mL at 7 dpi, significantly lower than that of the placebo group.
“In contrast, the viral load in the throat swabs of the low-dose group peaked (5.33 log10copies/mL) at 5 dpi and then decreased to 1.12 log10copies/mL at 7 dpi, which was significantly lower than that of the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth low-dose and high-dose BBIBP-CorV conferred highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 in macaques without observed antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.
“Taken together, all these results demonstrated that both low-dose and high-dose BBIBP-CorV conferred highly efficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 in macaques without observed antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The rhesus macaque intratracheal challenge model with 10^6 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2 reproduces human COVID-19 disease sufficiently to assess vaccine protection.
- Rests on an assumption: Absence of detectable antibody-dependent enhancement in rhesus macaques indicates absence of ADE in humans.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe HB02 strain showed the most optimal replication and generated the highest virus yields in Vero cells among the three viral strains.
“We first found that the HB02 strain showed the most optimal replication and generated highest virus yields in Vero cells among three viral strains (Figure 1 A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn mice, NAb levels at 7, 14, and 21 days in the low- and middle-dose groups show significant variation, whereas no significant variation between 21 and 28 days was observed.
“The NAb levels at 7, 14, and 21 days in the low- and middle-dose groups show significant variation, whereas no significant variation between 21 and 28 days was observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInactivation of three batches of virus with β-propionolactone eliminated viral infectivity, validating good stability and repeatability of the inactivation process.
“The inactivation of three batches of virus eliminated viral infectivity, validating the good stability, and repeatability of the inactivation process (Figure 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn cynomolgus monkeys, granulomatous inflammation was observed in the 2, 4, and 8 μg/dose groups on D25 and remained at the end of the recovery period (D36), with a slight improvement compared to that observed on D25.
“Granulomatous inflammation was observed in the 2, 4, and 8 μg/dose groups on D25 and remained at the end of the recovery period (D36), with a slight improvement compared to that observed on D25.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn guinea pigs, the low- and high-dose groups showed no allergic reactions at D19 and D26, and the allergic reactions were negative.
“In sharp contrast, in the low- and high-dose groups, no allergic reactions at D19 and D26 were found, and the allergic reactions were negative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn cynomolgus monkeys, the animals showed only local irritation characterized by mild to severe granulomatous inflammation due to injection, but this reaction was absent at 2 weeks after injection.
“The animals showed only local irritation characterized by mild to severe granulomatous inflammation due to injection, but this reaction was absent at 2 weeks after injection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe no observed adverse effect level was found to be 8 μg/dose in the cynomolgus monkey trial.
“The no observed adverse effect level was found to be 8 μg/dose in this trial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBBIBP-CorV conferred effective protection and prevented all vaccinated macaques from viral interstitial pneumonia.
“both BBIBP-CorV and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 conferred effective protection and prevented all vaccinated macaques from viral interstitial pneumonia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBBIBP-CorV vaccination could efficiently block the infection of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease in monkeys.
“demonstrating the BBIBP-CorV vaccination could efficiently block the infection of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease in monkey.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The rhesus macaque intratracheal challenge model with 10^6 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2 reproduces human COVID-19 disease sufficiently to assess vaccine protection.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe results support further evaluation of BBIBP-CorV in a clinical trial.
“These results support the further evaluation of BBIBP-CorV in a clinical trial.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Here, we report the study of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate (BBIBP-CorV) and show that its potency and safety in preclinical studies warrants further clinical evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The immunogenicity and protective efficacy observed in animal models predict immunogenicity and protection in humans.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenRhesus macaque studies were performed in an ABSL-3 laboratory and approved by IACUC of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, CAMS with approval number GH20008.
“Rhesus macaque studies were performed in an animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL-3) laboratory and approved by the IACUC of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences with approval number GH20008.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe sample size and statistical method were indicated in Method Details or Figure Legends.
“The sample size and statistical method were indicated in Method Details or Figure Legends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe pipeline used for BBIBP-CorV pilot-scale production sheds light on rapid vaccine development against other coronaviruses.
“and the pipeline used for BBIBP-CorV pilot-scale production also sheds light on rapid vaccine developing against other coronavirus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll cynomolgus monkey experiments were approved by the institutional animal ethics committee (IACUC) prior to operation.
“All cynomolgus monkey experiments were approved by the institutional animal ethics committee (IACUC) prior to operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll experiments were randomized and no data was excluded from data analysis.
“All experiments were randomized and no data was excluded from data analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll experiments in this study were performed with replication numbers indicated in Method Details or Figure Legends.
“All experiments in this study were performed with replications numbers indicated in Method Details or Figure Legends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll animals participating in this research are in good health and are not involved in other experimental procedures.
“All animals participate in this research are in good health and are not involved in other experimental procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animals involved in this study were housed and cared for in an AAALAC-accredited facility.
“All animals involved in this study were housed and cared for in an Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)-accredited facility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenCynomolgus monkeys, rabbits, guinea pigs, rats and mice were randomly divided into three groups.
“Cynomolgus monkeys, rabbits, guinea pigs, rats and mice were randomly divided into three groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenProtection effects on the upper respiratory tract are not assessed in this study and warrant further evaluation.
“Of note, the protection effects on the upper respiratory tract are not assessed in this study and warrant further evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChAdOx1 nCoV-19 conferred effective protection and prevented all vaccinated macaques from viral interstitial pneumonia.
“both BBIBP-CorV and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 conferred effective protection and prevented all vaccinated macaques from viral interstitial pneumonia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Doremalen et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 5 of 6 lung lobes in the vaccinated group showed detectable viral load.
“For ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 5 of 6 lung lobes in vaccinated group showed the detectable viral load (van Doremalen et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Doremalen et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll experimental procedures with mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, and nonhuman primates were conducted according to Chinese animal use guidelines and were approved by IACUC.
“All experimental procedures with mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, and nonhuman primates were conducted according to Chinese animal use guidelines and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn protection studies, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and the DNA vaccine were challenged by both lower and upper respiratory tract, whereas PiCoVacc and BBIBP-CorV were intratracheally challenged.
“In the protection studies, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and the DNA vaccine were challenged by both lower and upper respiratory tract, whereas PiCoVacc and BBIBP-CorV were intratracheally challenged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataTwo-dose low-dose BBIBP-CorV might benefit further clinical usage of the inactivated vaccine with less adverse effects.
“which might benefit the further clinical usage of the inactivated vaccine with less adverse effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The immunogenicity and protective efficacy observed in animal models predict immunogenicity and protection in humans.
“These results support the further evaluation of BBIBP-CorV in a clinical trial.”
“indicating the potential good safety of BBIBP-CorV in humans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rhesus macaque intratracheal challenge model with 10^6 TCID50 SARS-CoV-2 reproduces human COVID-19 disease sufficiently to assess vaccine protection.
“At D24 (10 days after the second immunization), all macaques were intratracheally challenged with l06 TCID50 of SARS-CoV-2 per monkey under anesthesia.”
“demonstrating the BBIBP-CorV vaccination could efficiently block the infection of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease in monkey.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Absence of detectable antibody-dependent enhancement in rhesus macaques indicates absence of ADE in humans.
“without detectable antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
“without observed antibody-dependent enhancement of infection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Vero cells used for virus isolation and vaccine production are certified by WHO for vaccine production.
“Notably, all of these strains were isolated from Vero cells, which have been certified by WHO for vaccine production.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No effective antiviral drug against SARS-CoV-2 exists.
“In the absence of an effective antiviral drug against SARS-CoV-2, vaccines with good potency and safety will be needed to effectively establish immunity in population.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates have shown promising results in preclinical trials.
“Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates have shown promising results in preclinical trials.13, 14, 15”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Local inflammation is both present and absent at two weeks
MajorGranulomatous inflammation is said to remain on day 36, which is two weeks after the final injection on day 22. The next sentence says that this injection-site reaction was absent two weeks after injection.
“Granulomatous inflammation was observed in the 2, 4, and 8 μg/dose groups on D25 and remained at the end of the recovery period (D36), with a slight improvement compared to that observed on D25.”
“The animals showed only local irritation characterized by mild to severe granulomatous inflammation due to injection, but this reaction was absent at 2 weeks after injection.”
Day 25 is misidentified as three days after the third vaccination
MinorThe stated vaccination days make day 25 three days after the fourth vaccination on day 22, not the third vaccination on day 15.
“day 25 (3 days after the third vaccination), and day 36 (14 days after the fourth vaccination)”
“Cynomolgus monkeys were intramuscularly injected four times on days 1, 8, 15, and 22”
Cites
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017 · Cited by 28,244 · see citing works
Self-citationA pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin
Zhou, P., Yang, X.-L., Wang, X.-G., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Si, H.-R., Zhu, Y., Li, B., Huang, C.-L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 · Cited by 21,969 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong, F., Han, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Wei, Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30211-7 · Cited by 21,415 · see citing works
MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform
Katoh, K. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436 · Cited by 17,027 · see citing works
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Ren, R., Leung, K. S. M., Lau, E. H. Y., Wong, J. Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001316 · Cited by 16,575 · see citing works
Self-citationFastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894 · see citing works
Lu, R., Zhao, X., Li, J., Niu, P., Yang, B., Wu, H., Wang, W., Song, H., Huang, B., Zhu, N., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30251-8 · Cited by 11,907 · see citing works
Self-citationChan, J., Yuan, S.-F., Kok, K.-H., To, K., Chu, H., Yang, J., Xing, F., Liu, J.-L., Yip, C., Poon, R., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30154-9 · Cited by 8,450 · see citing works
Self-citationA novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern
Wang, C., Horby, P. W., Hayden, F. G., & Gao, G. F. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30185-9 · Cited by 7,700 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y., & Lam, T. T. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12628 · Cited by 4,860 · see citing works
Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed
Lurie, N., Saville, M., Hatchett, R., & Halton, J. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2005630 · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2
Gao, Q., Bao, L., Mao, H., Wang, L., Xu, K., Yang, M., Li, Y., Zhu, L., Wang, N., Lv, Z., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc1932 · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques
Yu, J., Tostanoski, L. H., Peter, L., Mercado, N. B., McMahan, K., Mahrokhian, S. H., Nkolola, J. P., Liu, J., Li, Z., Chandrashekar, A., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc6284 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Self-citationChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques
van Doremalen, N., Lambe, T., Spencer, A., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Purushotham, J. N., Port, J. R., Avanzato, V. A., Bushmaker, T., Flaxman, A., Ulaszewska, M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2608-y · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Determination of 50% endpoint titer using a simple formula
Ramakrishnan, M. A. (2016) · World Journal of Virology · doi:10.5501/wjv.v5.i2.85 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
A Novel Coronavirus Genome Identified in a Cluster of Pneumonia Cases — Wuhan, China 2019−2020
Tan, W., Zhao, X., Ma, X., Wang, W., Niu, P., Xu, W., Gao, G. F., & Wu, G. (2020) · China CDC Weekly · doi:10.46234/ccdcw2020.017 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Self-citationRespiratory disease in rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2
Munster, V. J., Feldmann, F., Williamson, B. N., van Doremalen, N., Pérez-Pérez, L., Schulz, J., Meade-White, K., Okumura, A., Callison, J., Brumbaugh, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2324-7 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Kuwahara, K., Li, L., Liu, Z., Li, T., Zhu, H., Liu, J., Xu, Y., Xie, J., et al. (2016) · ACS Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00006 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationAge‐related rhesus macaque models of COVID‐19
Yu, P., Qi, F., Xu, Y., Li, F., Liu, P., Liu, J., Bao, L., Deng, W., Gao, H., Xiang, Z., et al. (2020) · Animal Models and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1002/ame2.12108 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationEvasion of antibody neutralization in emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses
Yang, Z., Werner, H. C., Kong, W., Leung, K., Traggiai, E., Lanzavecchia, A., & Nabel, G. J. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409065102 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques
van Doremalen, N., Lambe, T., Spencer, A., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Purushotham, J. N., Port, J. R., Avanzato, V., Bushmaker, T., Flaxman, A., Ulaszewska, M., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.13.093195 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Infection with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) causes pneumonia in Rhesus macaques
Shan, C., Yao, Y., Yang, X., Zhou, Y., Gao, G., Peng, Y., Yang, L., Hu, X., Xiong, J., Jiang, R.-D., et al. (2020) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-020-0364-z · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA vaccines: prime time is now
Gary, E. N., & Weiner, D. B. (2020) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2020.01.006 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Adenoviral vector-based strategies against infectious disease and cancer
Zhang, C., & Zhou, D. (2016) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2016.1165908 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Key steps in vaccine development
Stern, P. L. (2020) · Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2020.01.025 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Infection with Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Causes Pneumonia in the Rhesus Macaques
Shan, C., Yao, Y.-F., Yang, X.-L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.25200/v1 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development
Krammer, F. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3 · Cited by 2,098 · see citing works
Rydyznski Moderbacher, C., Ramirez, S. I., Dan, J. M., Grifoni, A., Hastie, K. M., Weiskopf, D., Belanger, S., Abbott, R. K., Kim, C., Choi, J., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.038 · Cited by 1,790 · see citing works
“…titers were associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2 in non-human primate infection and rechallenge studies (Chandra-shekar et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2020), as well as in three candidate COVID-19 vaccine studies in non-human primates (Gao et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020c; Yu et al., 2020).”
Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates
Corbett, K. S., Flynn, B., Foulds, K. E., Francica, J. R., Boyoglu-Barnum, S., Werner, A. P., Flach, B., O’Connell, S., Bock, K. W., Minai, M., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2024671 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Self-citationXia, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Gao, G. F., Tan, W., Wu, G., Xu, M., Lou, Z., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30831-8 · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
Self-citationCorrelates of Protection Against SARS-CoV-2 in Rhesus Macaques
McMahan, K., Yu, J., Mercado, N. B., Loos, C., Tostanoski, L. H., Chandrashekar, A., Liu, J., Peter, L., Atyeo, C., Zhu, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03041-6 · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
Self-citationViral targets for vaccines against COVID-19
Dai, L., & Gao, G. (2020) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00480-0 · Cited by 949 · see citing works
Self-citationImmunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies
Jeyanathan, M., Afkhami, S., Smaill, F., Miller, M. S., Lichty, B. D., & Xing, Z. (2020) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00434-6 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
Tanriover, M. D., Doğanay, H. L., Akova, M., Güner, H. R., Azap, A., Akhan, S., Köse, Ş., Erdinç, F. Ş., Akalın, E. H., Tabak, Ö. F., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01429-x · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Effect of 2 Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Symptomatic COVID-19 Infection in Adults
Kaabi, N. A. M. A., Zhang, Y., Xia, S., Yang, Y., AlQahtani, M., Abdulrazzaq, N. M., Nusair, M. A., Hassany, M., Jawad, J. S., Abdalla, J., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.8565 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Self-citationXia, S., Duan, K., Zhang, Y.-T., Zhao, D.-Y., Zhang, H., Xie, Z., Li, X., Peng, C., Zhang, Y.-B., Zhang, W., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.15543 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Self-citationSARS-CoV-2 vaccines strategies: a comprehensive review of phase 3 candidates
Kyriakidis, N. C., López‐Cortés, A., Vásconez-González, J., Barreto, A., & Ortiz‐Prado, E. (2021) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00292-w · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Immunological mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 in humans
Sadarangani, M., Marchant, A., & Kollmann, T. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00578-z · Cited by 560 · see citing works
A Review of the Progress and Challenges of Developing a Vaccine for COVID-19
Sharma, O., Sultan, A. A., Ding, H., & Triggle, C. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.585354 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
Dong, Y.-T., Dai, T., Wei, Y., Zhang, L., Zheng, M., & Zhou, F.-F. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00352-y · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Coronavirus vaccine development: from SARS and MERS to COVID-19
Li, Y.-D., Chi, W.-Y., Su, J.-H., Ferrall, L., Hung, C., & Wu, T. ‐. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-020-00695-2 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Yang, S., Li, Y., Dai, L., Wang, J., He, P., Li, C., Fang, X. D., Wang, C., Zhao, X., Huang, E., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00127-4 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Self-citationCOVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons and prospects
Li, M., Wang, H., Tian, L., Pang, Z., Yang, Q., Huang, T., Fan, J., Song, L., Tong, Y., & Fan, H. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00996-y · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Self-citationCOVID-19 vaccines: rapid development, implications, challenges and future prospects
Kashte, S., Gulbake, A., El‐Amin, S. F., & Gupta, A. (2021) · Human Cell · doi:10.1007/s13577-021-00512-4 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Covid‐19 vaccines and variants of concern: A review
Hassine, I. H. (2021) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.2313 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
COVID-19 vaccines: The status and perspectives in delivery points of view
Chung, J. Y., Thone, M. N., & Kwon, Y. J. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.12.011 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Heinz, F., & Stiasny, K. (2021) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00369-6 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Ma, X.-C., Zou, F., Yu, F., Li, R., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, J., Chen, T., Song, Z., et al. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.015 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy
Zhang, Q., Xiang, R., Huo, S., Zhou, Y., Jiang, S., Wang, Q., & Yu, F. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00653-w · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Hartley, G. E., Edwards, E. S. J., Aui, P. M., Varese, N., Stojanovic, S., McMahon, J., Peleg, A. Y., Boo, I., Drummer, H. E., Hogarth, P. M., et al. (2020) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abf8891 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Role of nanotechnology behind the success of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19
Khurana, A., Allawadhi, P., Khurana, I., Allwadhi, S., Weiskirchen, R., Banothu, A. K., Chhabra, D., Joshi, K., & Bharani, K. K. (2021) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101142 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
COVID-19: Characteristics and Therapeutics
Chilamakuri, R., & Agarwal, S. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10020206 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Trougakos, I. P., Stamatelopoulos, K. S., Terpos, E., Tsitsilonis, O., Aivalioti, E., Paraskevis, D. N., Kastritis, E., Pavlakis, G. N., & Dimopoulos, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-020-00703-5 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Side effects and perceptions following Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccination
Saeed, B. Q., Al-Shahrabi, R. M., Alhaj, S. S., Alkokhardi, Z. M., & Adrees, A. O. (2021) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.013 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Accelerated COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons, and prospects
Bok, K., Sitar, S., Graham, B. S., & Mascola, J. R. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.017 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
McDonald, I., Murray, S. M., Reynolds, C. J., Altmann, D. M., & Boyton, R. J. (2021) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00336-1 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
van Doremalen, N., Purushotham, J. N., Schulz, J. E., Holbrook, M. G., Bushmaker, T., Carmody, A., Port, J. R., Yinda, C. K., Okumura, A., Saturday, G. A., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abh0755 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Wang, R., Zhang, Q., Ge, J., Ren, W., Zhang, R., Lan, J., Ju, B., Su, B., Yu, F., Chen, P., et al. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.003 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, X., Huang, Y., Wang, W., Jing, Q., Zhang, C., Qin, P., Guan, W., Gan, L., Li, Y., Liu, W., et al. (2021) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2021.1969291 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationKang, Y.-F., Sun, C., Zhuang, Z., Yuan, R.-Y., Zheng, Q., Li, J.-P., Zhou, P., Chen, X.-C., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., et al. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c08379 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of nonhuman primates identified the suitable model for COVID-19
Lu, S., Zhao, Y., Yu, W., Yang, Y., Gao, J., Wang, J., Kuang, D., Yang, M., Yang, J., Ma, C., et al. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00269-6 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationFeng, L.-Q., Wang, Q., Chao, S., Yang, C., Feng, Y., Wu, J., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Jiang, R.-D., Hu, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18077-5 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationRihn, S. J., Merits, A., Bakshi, S., Turnbull, M. L., Wickenhagen, A., Alexander, A. J. T., Baillie, C., Brennan, B., Brown, F., Brunker, K., et al. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001091 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Hatmal, M. M., Al-Hatamleh, M. A. I., Olaimat, A. N., Hatmal, M., Alhaj-Qasem, D. M., Olaimat, T. M., & Mohamud, R. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9060556 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Azvudine is a thymus-homing anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug effective in treating COVID-19 patients
Zhang, J., Li, Y., Wang, L., Liu, H., Lu, S., Liu, Y., Li, K., Liu, B., Li, S., Shao, F., et al. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00835-6 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationThe SARS-CoV-2 mutations versus vaccine effectiveness: New opportunities to new challenges
Malik, J. A., Ahmed, S., Aroosa, M., Shinde, M., Bender, O., Alshammari, F., Ansari, M., & Anwar, S. (2022) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2021.12.014 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Xu, W., Xia, S., Gu, C., Wang, X., Wang, Q., Zhou, J., Wu, Y., Cai, X., Qu, D., et al. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00402-5 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citationSallam, M., Dababseh, D., Eid, H., Hasan, H., Taim, D., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Haidar, A., Yaseen, A. I. B., Ababneh, N. A., Assaf, A. M., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052407 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Adjuvants for Coronavirus Vaccines
Liang, Z., Zhu, H., Wang, X., Jing, B., Li, Z., Xia, X., Sun, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, W., Shi, L., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.589833 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Two-Component Spike Nanoparticle Vaccine Protects Macaques from SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Brouwer, P. J. M., Brinkkemper, M., Maisonnasse, P., Dereuddre‐Bosquet, N., Grobben, M., Claireaux, M. A. F., de Gast, M., Marlin, R., Chesnais, V., Diry, S., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.035 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Xia, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Gao, G. F., Tan, W., Wu, G., Xu, M., Lou, Z., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00462-x · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationPowell, A. E., Zhang, K., Sanyal, M., Tang, S., Weidenbacher, P. A. B., Li, S., Pham, T. D., Pak, J. E., Chiu, W., & Kim, P. S. (2021) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c01405 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 and the molecular basis for SARS-CoV-2 binding to cat ACE2
Wu, L., Chen, Q., Liu, K., Wang, J., Han, P., Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Meng, Y., Pan, X., Qiao, C., et al. (2020) · Cell Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41421-020-00210-9 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of current COVID-19 vaccine platforms
Nagy, A., & Alhatlani, B. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.061 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
A single-dose live-attenuated YF17D-vectored SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate
Sánchez-Felipe, L., Vercruysse, T., Sharma, S., Ma, J., Lemmens, V., Looveren, D. V., Javarappa, M. P. A., Boudewijns, R., Malengier‐Devlies, B., Liesenborghs, L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3035-9 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines
Su, S., Du, L., & Jiang, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-00462-y · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2 induced by infection or vaccination
Dopico, X. C., Ols, S., Loré, K., & Hedestam, G. B. K. (2021) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.13372 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Li, J., Wu, S., Guo, X., Tang, R., Huang, B., Chen, X., Chen, Y., Hou, L.-H., Liu, J.-X., Zhong, J., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00087-x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationInhaled SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for single-dose dry powder aerosol immunization
Ye, T., Jiao, Z., Li, X., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06809-8 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationFadlyana, E., Rusmil, K., Tarigan, R., Rahmadi, A. R., Prodjosoewojo, S., Sofiatin, Y., Khrisna, C. V., Sari, R. M., Setyaningsih, L., Surachman, F., et al. (2021) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.052 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Hassan, A. O., Feldmann, F., Zhao, H.-Y., Curiel, D., Okumura, A., Tang-Huau, T.-L., Case, J., Meade-White, K., Callison, J. A., Chen, R. E., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100230 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
A SARS-CoV-2 ferritin nanoparticle vaccine elicits protective immune responses in nonhuman primates
Joyce, M., King, H. A. D., Elakhal-Naouar, I., Ahmed, A., Peachman, K. K., Cincotta, C. M., Subra, C., Chen, R. E., Thomas, P., Chen, W.-H., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abi5735 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Yang, R., Deng, Y., Huang, B., Huang, L., Lin, A., Li, Y., Wang, W., Liu, J., Lu, S., Zhan, Z., et al. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00634-z · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationCOVID-19 vaccines for patients with cancer: benefits likely outweigh risks
Hwang, J. K., Zhang, T., Wang, A. Z., & Li, Z.-H. (2021) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-021-01046-w · Cited by 111 · see citing works
An intranasal vaccine durably protects against SARS-CoV-2 variants in mice
Hassan, A. O., Shrihari, S., Gorman, M. J., Ying, B., Yuan, D., Raju, S., Chen, R. E., Dmitriev, I. P., Kashentseva, E. A., Adams, L. J., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109452 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
He, L., Lin, X., Wang, Y., Abraham, C., Sou, C., Ngo, T., Zhang, Y., Wilson, I. A., & Zhu, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf1591 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationTherapeutic targets and interventional strategies in COVID-19: mechanisms and clinical studies
Zhou, Y., Xie, Y., Tang, L., Pu, D., Zhu, Y., Liu, J., & Ma, X. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00733-x · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationTortorici, M. A., Addetia, A., Seo, A. J., Brown, J. T., Sprouse, K., Logue, J., Clark, E., Franko, N., Chu, H. Y., & Veesler, D. (2024) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2024.02.016 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Approaches and Challenges in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development
Dagotto, G., Yu, J., & Barouch, D. H. (2020) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.002 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
COVID-19 Vaccines: Current Understanding on Immunogenicity, Safety, and Further Considerations
He, Q., Mao, Q., Zhang, J., Bian, L., Gao, F., Wang, J., Xu, M., & Liang, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.669339 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, Z., Zhou, J., Xu, W., Deng, W., Wang, Y., Wang, M., Wang, Q., Hsieh, M. K., Dong, J., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-022-00612-2 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of virus genetic variability and host immunity for the success of COVID-19 vaccines
dos Santos, W. G. (2021) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111272 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Immunogenicity of clinically relevant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in nonhuman primates and humans
Klasse, P. J., Nixon, D. F., & Moore, J. P. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe8065 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Yadav, P., Ella, R., Kumar, S., Patil, D. R., Mohandas, S., Shete, A., Vadrevu, K. M., Bhati, G., Sapkal, G., Kaushal, H., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21639-w · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Whole Inactivated Virus and Protein-Based COVID-19 Vaccines
Hotez, P. J., & Bottazzi, M. E. (2021) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-042420-113212 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Update on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines on different variants of SARS-CoV-2
Firouzabadi, N., Ghasemiyeh, P., Moradishooli, F., & Mohammadi‐Samani, S. (2023) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109968 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
An overview on nanoparticle-based strategies to fight viral infections with a focus on COVID-19
Yasamineh, S., Kalajahi, H. G., Yasamineh, P., Yazdani, Y., Gholizadeh, O., Tabatabaie, R., Afkhami, H., Davodabadi, F., farkhad, A. K., Pahlevan, D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01625-0 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Wang, S., Li, W., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Li, E., Xia, X., Yan, F., & Chiu, S. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01917-x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
New vaccine production platforms used in developing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
Ura, T., Yamashita, A., Mizuki, N., Okuda, K., & Shimada, M. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.054 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Chakraborty, C., Bhattacharya, M., & Dhama, K. (2023) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines11030682 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Progress and Pitfalls in the Quest for Effective SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines
Flanagan, K. L., Best, E., Crawford, N. W., Giles, M., Koirala, A., Macartney, K. K., Russell, F. M., Teh, B. W., & Wen, S. C.-H. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.579250 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Beladiya, J., Kumar, A., Vasava, Y., Parmar, K., Patel, D., Patel, S., Dholakia, S., Sheth, D., Boddu, S. H. S., & Patel, C. (2024) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.2507 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Guo, Y., Huang, L.-S., Zhang, G.-S., Yao, Y.-F., Zhou, H., Shěn, S., Shen, B., Li, B., Li, X., Zhang, Q., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22926-2 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationA focused review on technologies, mechanisms, safety, and efficacy of available COVID-19 vaccines
Ghasemiyeh, P., Mohammadi‐Samani, S., Firouzabadi, N., Dehshahri, A., & Vazin, A. (2021) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108162 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Safety of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among healthcare workers in China
Zhang, M., Zhang, T.-T., Shi, G., Cheng, F., Zheng, Y.-M., Tung, T., & Chen, H. (2021) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1080/14760584.2021.1925112 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ghiasi, N., Valizadeh, R., Mishabi, M. A., et al. (2021) · Immunopathologia Persa · doi:10.34172/ipp.2021.31 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Th1 skewed immune response of whole virion inactivated SARS CoV 2 vaccine and its safety evaluation
Ganneru, B., Jogdand, H., Daram, V. K., Das, D., Molugu, N. R., Prasad, S. D., Kannappa, S. V., Ella, K. M., Ravikrishnan, R., Awasthi, A., et al. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102298 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
An, D., Li, K., Rowe, D. K., Gingerich, M. C., Griffin, E. F., Beavis, A. C., Johnson, S. K., Padykula, I., Jones, C. A., Briggs, K., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi5246 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Rakib, A., Sami, S. A., Mimi, N. J., et al. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103967 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in advanced clinical trials: Where do we stand?
Chakraborty, S., Mallajosyula, V. V. A., Tato, C. M., Tan, G. S., & Wang, T. T. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.014 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
The success of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and challenges ahead
Subbarao, K. (2021) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2021.06.016 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Hong, J., Xu, X., Yang, J., Zheng, J., Dai, S.-M., Zhou, J., Zhang, Q., Ruan, Y., & Ling, C. (2021) · Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.joim.2021.10.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Kanokudom, S., Assawakosri, S., Suntronwong, N., Auphimai, C., Nilyanimit, P., Vichaiwattana, P., Thongmee, T., Yorsaeng, R., Srimuan, D., Thatsanatorn, T., et al. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10010086 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Acute Uveitis following COVID-19 Vaccination
ElSheikh, R. H., Haseeb, A. A., Eleiwa, T. K., et al. (2021) · Ocular Immunology and Inflammation · doi:10.1080/09273948.2021.1962917 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
COVID-19 Vaccines: “Warp Speed” Needs Mind Melds, Not Warped Minds
Moore, J., & Klasse, P. (2020) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01083-20 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Rosa, R. B., Dantas, W. M., do Nascimento, J. C. F., da Silva, M. V., de Oliveira, R. N., & Pena, L. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13030379 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Vaccine Strategies, Their Effectiveness, and Issues
Khandker, S. S., Godman, B., Jawad, M. I., Meghla, B. A., Tisha, T. A., Khondoker, M. U., Haq, M. A., Charan, J., Talukder, A. A., Azmuda, N., et al. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9121387 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-adaptive virtual microchannel for continuous enrichment and separation of nanoparticles
Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Jin, K., He, M., Wei, W., Chen, X., Yang, Q., Wang, Y., Pang, W., Ren, X., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn8440 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Batty, C. J., Heise, M. T., Bachelder, E. M., & Ainslie, K. M. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.12.006 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Valyi-Nagy, I. T., Matula, Z., Gönczi, M., Tasnády, S., Bekő, G., Réti, M., Ajzner, É., & Uher, F. (2021) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-021-00471-6 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Wang, J., Yue, T., Li, D., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.758294 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Strain-release alkylation of Asp12 enables mutant selective targeting of K-Ras-G12D
Zheng, Q., Zhang, Z., Guiley, K. Z., & Shokat, K. M. (2024) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01565-w · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationJin, P., Li, J., Pan, H., Wu, Y.-F., & Zhu, F. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00481-y · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Sun, S., Cai, Y., Song, T., Yang, P., Cheng, L., Xu, H., Sun, J., Meng, C., Lin, Y., Huang, H., et al. (2021) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00531-8 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationStatus Report on COVID-19 Vaccines Development
Kumar, A., Dowling, W. E., Román, R. G., Chaudhari, A. B., Gurry, C., Le, T. T., Tollefson, S., Clark, C. E., Bernasconi, V., & Kristiansen, P. A. (2021) · Current Infectious Disease Reports · doi:10.1007/s11908-021-00752-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
An overview on inactivated and live‐attenuated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines
Khoshnood, S., Arshadi, M., Akrami, S., Koupaei, M., Ghahramanpour, H., Shariati, A., Sadeghifard, N., & Heidary, M. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis · doi:10.1002/jcla.24418 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Huang, B., Deng, W., Quan, Y., Wang, W., Xu, W., Zhao, Y., Li, N., Zhang, J., Liang, H., Bao, L., Xu, Y., Ding, L., Zhou, W., Gao, H., Liu, J., Niu, P., Zhao, L., Zhen, W., Fu, H., Yu, S., Zhang, Z., Xu, G., Li, C., Lou, Z., Xu, M., Qin, C., Wu, G., Gao, G. F., Tan, W., & Yang, X.
- Affiliations
- National Vaccine and Serum Institute (CN)
- Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
- National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- China National Pharmaceutical Group Corporation (China) (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Changgui
- Lou, Zhiyong
- Xu, Miao
- Qin, Chuan
- Wu, Guizhen
- Gao, George Fu
- Tan, Wenjie
- Yang, Xiaoming
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 713-721.e9
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7275151
- OpenAlex
- W3034173374
- Semantic Scholar
- 6f16ad05c488ce92ac0c56e4f8b5a81cb7c39d0d
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 270 · 2020: 78 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 21.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Keywords
- BBIBP-CorV, inactivated vaccine, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, vaccine production, genetic stability, antibody-dependent enhancement, rhesus monkeys, Macaca fascicularis, intratracheal challenge, vaccine safety
- MeSH terms
- Immunogenicity, Vaccine, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Chlorocebus aethiops, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Female, Guinea Pigs, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Phylogeny, Pneumonia, Viral, Rabbits, Vero Cells, Viral Vaccines, Vaccines, Inactivated, Rats, Wistar, Coronavirus Infections, Mice, Rats, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review