Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR system: Discovery, development and off-target detection

Chen, Shengmiao, Yao, Yufeng, Zhang, Yanchun, Fan, Gaofeng·2020·Cellular Signalling

Abstract

As a revolutionary gene editing tool based on the adaptive immune defense mechanism of bacteria and archaea against exogenous DNA invasion, CRISPR/Cas system shows many remarkable characteristics over ZFNs and TALENs. However, off-target effect remains as one of the major imperfection of CRISPR/Cas system, hindering its further application in translational research. In this review, we highlight major breakthrough cross the development/application of this powerful toolkit, and summarize feasible methods for detecting potential off-target effects during genetic manipulation. We hope this review will assist scientists for accurate genomic editing in their future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109577

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Ishino, 1987, Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product, J. Bacteriol., 169, 5429, 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mojica, 1995, Long stretches of short tandem repeats are present in the largest replicons of the archaea Haloferax mediterranei and Haloferax volcanii and could be involved in replicon partitioning, Mol. Microbiol., 17, 85, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17010085.x · DOI
  3. Nakata, 1989, Unusual nucleotide arrangement with repeated sequences in the Escherichia coli K-12 chromosome, J. Bacteriol., 171, 3553, 10.1128/jb.171.6.3553-3556.1989 · DOI
  4. Mojica, 2000, Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria, Mol. Microbiol., 36, 244, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x · DOI
  5. Jansen, 2002, Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes, Mol. Microbiol., 43, 1565, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bolotin, 2005, Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin, Microbiology, 151, 2551, 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mojica, 2005, Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements, J. Mol. Evol., 60, 174, 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Barrangou, 2007, CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes, Science, 315, 1709, 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Marraffini, 2008, CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA, Science, 322, 1843, 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Garneau, 2010, The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA, Nature, 468, 67, 10.1038/nature09523 · DOI
  11. Jinek, 2012, A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science, 337, 816, 10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gaj, 2013, ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering, Trends Biotechnol., 31, 397, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mali, 2013, RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9, Science, 339, 823, 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cong, 2013, Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems, Science, 339, 819, 10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Makarova, 2011, Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 467, 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Carr, 2009, Genome engineering, Nat. Biotechnol., 27, 1151, 10.1038/nbt.1590 · DOI
  17. Anders, 2014, Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease, Nature, 513, 569, 10.1038/nature13579 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kleinstiver, 2015, Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 1293, 10.1038/nbt.3404 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Xie, 2018, SaCas9 requires 5’-NNGRRT-3’ PAM for sufficient cleavage and possesses higher cleavage activity than SpCas9 or FnCpf1 in human cells, Biotechnol. J., 13, 10.1002/biot.201800080 · DOI
  20. Price, 2015, Cas9-mediated targeting of viral RNA in eukaryotic cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 112, 6164, 10.1073/pnas.1422340112 · DOI
  21. Lee, 2016, The Neisseria meningitidis CRISPR-Cas9 system enables specific genome editing in mammalian cells, Mol. Ther., 24, 645, 10.1038/mt.2016.8 · DOI
  22. Wang, 2019, Optimized CRISPR guide RNA design for two high-fidelity Cas9 variants by deep learning, Nat. Commun., 10, 4284, 10.1038/s41467-019-12281-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zetsche, 2015, Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system, Cell, 163, 759, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Yang, 2016, PAM-dependent target DNA recognition and cleavage by C2c1 CRISPR-Cas endonuclease, Cell, 167
  25. Teng, 2018, Repurposing CRISPR-Cas12b for mammalian genome engineering, Cell Discov., 4, 63, 10.1038/s41421-018-0069-3 · DOI
  26. Strecker, 2019, Engineering of CRISPR-Cas12b for human genome editing, Nat. Commun., 10, 212, 10.1038/s41467-018-08224-4 · DOI
  27. Abudayyeh, 2016, C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector, Science, 353, 10.1126/science.aaf5573 · DOI · Paper page
  28. East-Seletsky, 2016, Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection, Nature, 538, 270, 10.1038/nature19802 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gootenberg, 2017, Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2, Science, 356, 438, 10.1126/science.aam9321 · DOI
  30. Gootenberg, 2018, Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6, Science, 360, 439, 10.1126/science.aaq0179 · DOI
  31. Smargon, 2017, Cas13b is a type VI-B CRISPR-associated RNA-guided RNase differentially regulated by accessory proteins Csx27 and Csx28, Mol. Cell, 65
  32. Konermann, 2018, Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors, Cell, 173
  33. Freije, 2019, Programmable inhibition and detection of RNA viruses using Cas13, Mol. Cell, 76
  34. Yang, 2019, Dynamic imaging of RNA in living cells by CRISPR-Cas13 systems, Mol. Cell, 76
  35. Harrington, 2018, Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes, Science, 362, 839, 10.1126/science.aav4294 · DOI
  36. Oakes, 2019, CRISPR-Cas9 circular permutants as programmable scaffolds for genome modification, Cell, 176
  37. Anzalone, 2019, Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA, Nature, 576, 149, 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Chang, 2017, Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 18, 495, 10.1038/nrm.2017.48 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Mashal, 1995, Detection of mutations by cleavage of DNA heteroduplexes with bacteriophage resolvases, Nat. Genet., 9, 177, 10.1038/ng0295-177 · DOI
  40. Bae, 2014, Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases, Bioinformatics, 30, 1473, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Li, 2019, Whole genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations and considerable inherent genetic or/and somaclonal variations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited cotton plants, Plant Biotechnol. J., 17, 858, 10.1111/pbi.13020 · DOI
  42. Solomon, 1988, Mapping proteinDNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene, Cell, 53, 937, 10.1016/S0092-8674(88)90469-2 · DOI
  43. Crosetto, 2013, Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing, Nat. Methods, 10, 361, 10.1038/nmeth.2408 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Gabriel, 2011, An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity, Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 816, 10.1038/nbt.1948 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Hu, 2016, Detecting DNA double-stranded breaks in mammalian genomes by linear amplification–mediated high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing, Nat. Protoc., 11, 853, 10.1038/nprot.2016.043 · DOI
  46. Roukos, 2013, Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells, Science, 341, 660, 10.1126/science.1237150 · DOI
  47. Kim, 2015, Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells, Nat. Methods, 12, 237, 10.1038/nmeth.3284 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 60

Metadata

Authors
Chen, S., Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., & Fan, G.
Venue
Cellular Signalling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
70
Pages
109577
ISSN
0898-6568
Cited by
60
References
20
Language
en
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872831)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2018YFC1004603)
  • ShanghaiTech University
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19JC1413800)
  • Shanghai Shuguang Program (19SG55)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review