Cited by 450Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Targeted Degradation of Oncogenic KRAS G12C by VHL-Recruiting PROTACs

Open access
Bond, Michael J., Chu, Ling, Nalawansha, Dhanusha A., Li, Ke, Crews, Craig M.·2020·ACS Central Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide KRAS is mutated in ∼20% of human cancers and is one of the most sought-after targets for pharmacological modulation, despite having historically been considered “undruggable.” The discovery of potent covalent inhibitors of the KRAS G12C mutant in recent years has sparked a new wave of interest in small molecules targeting KRAS. While these inhibitors have shown promise in the clinic, we wanted to explore PROTAC-mediated degradation as a complementary strategy to modulate mutant KRAS. Herein, we report the development of LC-2, the first PROTAC capable of degrading endogenous KRAS G12C . LC-2 covalently binds KRAS G12C with a MRTX849 warhead and recruits the E3 ligase VHL, inducing rapid and sustained KRAS G12C degradation leading to suppression of MAPK signaling in both homozygous and heterozygous KRAS G12C cell lines. LC-2 demonstrates that PROTAC-mediated degradation is a viable option for attenuating oncogenic KRAS levels and downstream signaling in cancer cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00411

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LC-2 is a PROTAC that fuses the G12C selective inhibitor MRTX849 with the E3 ubiquitin ligase VHL.

    “LC-2 is one such PROTAC that fuses the G12C selective inhibitor MRTX849 with the E3 ubiquitin ligase VHL [76].”

    From KRAS: Biology, Inhibition, and Mechanisms of Inhibitor Resistance (2024) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Discussion identifies LC-2 as a PROTAC that couples the KRASG12C-selective inhibitor MRTX849 to a VHL ligand. The claim is imprecise in saying LC-2 fuses MRTX849 with the VHL E3 ligase itself: the ligand recruits VHL; the ligase is not a component fused into LC-2. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PROTAC technologies are designed to induce selective degradation of KRAS proteins through recruitment of E3 ubiquitin ligases and subsequent proteasomal destruction.

    “PROTAC (proteolysis-targeting chimera) technologies are designed to induce selective degradation of KRAS proteins through recruitment of E3 ubiquitin ligases and subsequent proteasomal destruction [61,62,63,64].”
  • Treatment with LC-2 resulted in the proteasome-dependent depletion of mutant KRAS and the reduction in downstream signaling.

    “Treatment with LC-2 resulted in the proteasome-dependent depletion of mutant KRAS and the reduction in downstream signaling [76].”
  • LC-2 (197) is the first PROTAC molecule capable of degrading endogenous KRASG12C.

    “Crews’s group reported the development of LC-2 (197) in 2020, the first PROTAC molecule capable of degrading endogenous KRASG12C (Table 4).”
  • LC-2 binds covalently to KRASG12C through the MRTX849 warhead and recruits the E3 ligase VHL.

    “LC-2 binds covalently to KRASG12C through the MRTX849 warhead and recruits the E3 ligase VHL.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, M. J., Chu, L., Nalawansha, D. A., Li, K., & Crews, C. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Crews, Craig M.
Venue
ACS Central Science
Published
2020-07-08
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
1367-1375
ISSN
  • 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-7951
OpenAlex
W3040830058
Cited by
450
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Central Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (F31CA232477, R35197589, 5T32GM067543)
  • American Cancer Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
KRAS G12C, PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase, adagrasib, MAPK signaling, oncogenic KRAS, covalent inhibitors, cancer therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review