The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Scholars have made the conceptual distinction between issue polarization—an ideological, policy-based political divide, and affective polarization, i.e. dislike, distrust, and general animosity of political partisans toward the other political side (5, 61, 62).”
From Troll and divide: the language of online polarization (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 · Cited by 3,603
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006 · Cited by 1,992
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618923114 · Cited by 1,580
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
DRUCKMAN, J. N., PETERSON, E., & SLOTHUUS, R. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000500 · Cited by 1,569
Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 · Cited by 1,400
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608080493 · Cited by 1,308
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Hartman, R., Blakey, W., Womick, J., Bail, C., Finkel, E. J., Han, H., Sarrouf, J., Schroeder, J., Sheeran, P., Van Bavel, J. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3 · Cited by 171
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence
Mernyk, J. S., Pink, S. L., Druckman, J. N., & Willer, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116851119 · Cited by 146
Polarization in America: two possible futures
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.008 · Cited by 165
Algorithm-mediated social learning in online social networks
Brady, W. J., Jackson, J. C., Lindström, B., & Crockett, M. J. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.008 · Cited by 132
Polarization and social media: A systematic review and research agenda
Arora, S. D., Singh, G. P., Chakraborty, A., & Maity, M. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121942 · Cited by 163
Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K. L., Torres, M. P., Luo, K. F., Gendron, M., & Crockett, M. J. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01582-0 · Cited by 121
Troll and divide: the language of online polarization
Simchon, A., Brady, W. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac019 · Cited by 85
Tan, M., Straughan, P. T., & Cheong, G. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114767 · Cited by 84
Does Talking to the Other Side Reduce Inter-party Hostility? Evidence from Three Studies
Amsalem, E., Merkley, E., & Loewen, P. J. (2021) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1955056 · Cited by 80
Environmental Decision-Making in Times of Polarization
Judge, M., Kashima, Y., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. M. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-115339 · Cited by 73
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60
Scoville, C., McCumber, A. H., Amironesei, R., & Jeon, J. E. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221093158 · Cited by 53
Conformity and reactions to deviance in the time of COVID-19
Packer, D. J., Ungson, N. D., & Marsh, J. K. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220981419 · Cited by 37
Does affective polarization contribute to democratic backsliding in America?
Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., & Iyengar, S. (2023) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162241228952 · Cited by 33
Brady, W. J., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/dgt6u · Cited by 29
de Mello, V. O., Cheung, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00062-z · Cited by 35
de Mello, V. O., Cheung, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4x5em · Cited by 25
Long, K. N. G., Wilkinson, R., Cowden, R. G., Chen, Y., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116704 · Cited by 23
Overgaard, C. S. B. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241232662 · Cited by 22
D’Alonzo, S., & Tegmark, M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271947 · Cited by 29
Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes
Facciani, M., Lazić, A., Viggiano, G., & McKay, T. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004 · Cited by 22
Radicalization to Violence: A View from Cultural Psychiatry
Rousseau, C., Aggarwal, N. K., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2021) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615211048010 · Cited by 21
Marino, M., Iacono, R., & Mollerstrom, J. (2024) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102578 · Cited by 20
The future of wildlife conservation funding: What options do U.S. college students support?
Larson, L. R., Peterson, M. N., von Furstenberg, R. J., Vayer, V. R., Lee, K. J., Choi, D. Y., Stevenson, K. T., Ahlers, A. A., Anhalt‐Depies, C., Bethke, T., et al. (2021) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.505 · Cited by 20
Li, Y., & Bond, R. M. (2022) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqac020 · Cited by 19
Marino, G., & Iannelli, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174161 · Cited by 26
The influence of social identity on attitudes toward wildlife
Birdsong, M. H., Metcalf, A. L., Metcalf, E. C., Nesbitt, H. K., & Gude, J. A. (2024) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.14243 · Cited by 17
The Capture Effect: How Media Capture Affects Journalists, Markets and Audiences
Dragomir, M. (2024) · Central European Journal of Communication · doi:10.51480/1899-5101.17.2(36).586 · Cited by 21
Ideological responses to the breaking of COVID-19 social distancing recommendations
Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221074546 · Cited by 19
Ton, G. M., van Zomeren, M., & Stroebe, K. E. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2990 · Cited by 15
Political Polarization Triggers Conservatives’ Misinformation Spread to Attain Ingroup Dominance
Zhu, X., & Pechmann, C. (2024) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429241264997 · Cited by 15
Inclusivity in the marketplace through the lens of social-movements and counter-movements theories
Scott, M. L., Mende, M., & Ramón, L. G. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115058 · Cited by 16
You, Z. T., & Lee, S. W. S. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae286 · Cited by 18
Unraveling a “Cancel Culture” Dynamic: When, Why, and Which Americans Sanction Offensive Speech
Dias, N. C., Druckman, J. N., & Levendusky, M. S. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/733004 · Cited by 22
Ďurďovič, M., Kolářová, M., & Čermák, D. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104033 · Cited by 15
Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition
Aroyehun, S. T., Simchon, A., Carrella, F., Lasser, J., Lewandowsky, S., & García, D. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02136-2 · Cited by 22
Fact-Checking in Journalism: An Epistemological Framework
Suomalainen, K., Nykänen, N., Seeck, H. M. J., Kim, Y., & McPherson, E. (2025) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2025.2492729 · Cited by 24
Does Talking to the Other Side Reduce Inter-Party Hostility? Evidence From Three StudiesPreprint
Amsalem, E., Merkley, E. D., & Loewen, P. J. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4zver · Cited by 12
Data Driven Model to Investigate Political Bias in Mainstream Media
Ness, E. A., Fatima, A., & Oghaz, M. M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3270630 · Cited by 14
Iranzo-Cabrera, M., Castro-Bleda, M. J., Simón-Astudillo, I., & Hurtado, L.-F. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241269417 · Cited by 22
Garzón‐Velandia, D. C., Barreto, I., & Cameselle, J. M. S. (2024) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12416 · Cited by 15
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976241258149 · Cited by 14
Why can't we be friends? Untangling conjoined polarization in America
Norman, J. M., & Green, B. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13084 · Cited by 10
Media anti-populism and political parallelism in Latin America
Hallin, D. C., Kitzberger, P., & Pons, M. P. (2025) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1093/anncom/wlaf003 · Cited by 10
Rational inference strategies and the genesis of polarization and extremism
Kvam, P. D., Alaukik, A., Mims, C. E., Martemyanova, A., & Baldwin, M. W. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11389-0 · Cited by 13
Turel, O. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2248282 · Cited by 14
A high-dimensional approach to measuring online polarization
Phillips, S. C., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2023) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-023-00227-6 · Cited by 13
Public Opinion in the News: Examining Portrayals and Viewpoint Heterogeneity
Beckers, K., & Moy, P. (2021) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2021.1984282 · Cited by 9
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Partisanship
Harris, E., Pärnamets, P., Sternisko, A., Robertson, C. E., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.005 · Cited by 11
Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España
Crespo-Martínez, I., Melero-López, I., Mora-Rodríguez, A., & Rojo-Martínez, J.-M. (2024) · Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación · doi:10.14198/medcom.26681 · Cited by 8
Melek, G. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990231211796 · Cited by 12
Heseltine, M., von Hohenberg, B. C., Menchen-Trevino, E., Gackowski, T., & Wojcieszak, M. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2423093 · Cited by 9
Opening or Impasse? Critical Media Literacy Pedagogy in a Posttruth Era
Tebaldi, C., & Nygreen, K. (2021) · Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies · doi:10.1177/15327086211065810 · Cited by 8
Heckman, M., Bhargava, R., & Ndulue, E. B. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2023.2280545 · Cited by 8
Numeric social-media posts engage people with climate science
Peters, E. M., Markowitz, D. M., Nadratowski, A., & Shoots‐Reinhard, B. L. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae250 · Cited by 8
Wang, M.-J., Yogeeswaran, K., Sivaram, S., & Nash, K. A. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00987-4 · Cited by 8
Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions
Lees, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2204045119 · Cited by 6
Beyond Polarization: Right-Wing News as a Quasi-religious Phenomenon
Mann, M., & Winchester, D. (2025) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751251326951 · Cited by 8
Online schadenfreude as an outcome of ideological polarization: a case in Hong Kong
Au, C. H., & Ho, K. K. W. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-03-2021-0142 · Cited by 8
Epistemic language in news headlines shapes readers’ perceptions of objectivity
Chuey, A., Luo, Y., & Markman, E. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314091121 · Cited by 22
Ton, G. M., Stroebe, K. E., & van Zomeren, M. (2022) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12574 · Cited by 7
Ostafiński, W. (2022) · Zeszyty Prasoznawcze · doi:10.4467/22996362pz.22.037.16495 · Cited by 7
Ross, K. (2024) · Journal of Peace Education · doi:10.1080/17400201.2024.2407801 · Cited by 9
Grünwald, L., & Patterson, J. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104009 · Cited by 7
Hisherik, M., Gindi, S., Awida, N., & Saada, N. L. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2025.104996 · Cited by 6
Online toxic speech as positioning acts: Hate as discursive mechanisms for othering and belonging
Morales, E., Hodson, J., O’Meara, V., Gruzd, A. A., & Mai, P. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251338493 · Cited by 11
Bitonti, A., Marchetti, R., & Mariotti, C. (2022) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/02673231221140697 · Cited by 10
Maximizing biomedical research impacts through bioethical considerations
Tornini, V. A., Politi, S. P., Bruce, L., & Latham, S. R. (2023) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.050046 · Cited by 7
Political polarization: a curse of knowledge?
Beattie, P. M., & Beattie, M. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200627 · Cited by 6
Syahputra, I., Riyanto, W. F., Pratiwi, F. D., & Virga, R. L. (2023) · Media Asia · doi:10.1080/01296612.2023.2246726 · Cited by 17
Uyheng, J., Tyagi, A., & Carley, K. M. (2021) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3447535.3462486 · Cited by 7
Verboord, M. (2024) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/00207152231223730 · Cited by 7
Do Polarization Narratives Apply to Politics on the Periphery? The Case of Atlantic Canada
McLay, R., & Ramos, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.655880 · Cited by 10
Knowledge Graph Augmented Political Perspective Detection in News Media.Preprint
Feng, S., Chen, Z., Li, Q., & Luo, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 6
Schulman, J., Druckman, J. N., Safarpour, A., Baum, M. A., Ognyanova, K., Trujillo, K. L., Quintana, A., Qu, H., Uslu, A. A., Perlis, R. H., et al. (2025) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaf059 · Cited by 18
How to divide people with things: division entrepreneurs, wedges, and the Delta Smelt controversy
Scoville, C. (2024) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/s41290-024-00212-0 · Cited by 5
Tartaglione, J., & de‐Wit, L. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12787 · Cited by 7
What is Polarization in the Social Sciences? A Scoping Review of Reviews
Garzón‐Velandia, D. C., Barreto, I., & Cameselle, J. M. S. (2024) · Acta Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.14718/acp.2024.27.2.11 · Cited by 10
Unraveling a “Cancel Culture” Dynamic: When and Why Americans Sanction Offensive SpeechPreprint
Dias, N. C., Druckman, J. N., & Levendusky, M. S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4235680 · Cited by 5
Ali, I., Aziz, M. F., Albishri, N. A., Dash, S., Temperini, V., & Usai, A. (2026) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-04-2025-0597 · Cited by 6
How Mass Media Influences U.S. Political Polarization— A Comparison Study of CNN and Fox News
Yang, J. (2023) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202317802005 · Cited by 4
Andrich, A., & Domahidi, E. (2023) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849231215194 · Cited by 4
Loyalties and interests: How political motivations influence voters’ responses to scandals
Filho, A. J. P., Stephenson, L. B., & Turgeon, M. (2024) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102792 · Cited by 4
Overgaard, C. S. B., Lukito, J., & Soorholtz, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31380 · Cited by 9
The political communication of polarizing leaders. Evidence from Italy
Mariotti, C., & Stanziano, A. (2024) · Contemporary Italian Politics · doi:10.1080/23248823.2024.2362487 · Cited by 5
Romanowski, H., & Blake, L. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00830-z · Cited by 5
Ridge, R. D., Hawk, C. E., Hartvigsen, L. D., & McCombs, L. D. (2024) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2024.2316619 · Cited by 5
Holding a Position: Public Opinion as Cognition in a Disorganized Field
Boutyline, A. (2022) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101710 · Cited by 5
Franks, A. S., & Hesami, F. (2021) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc11030113 · Cited by 4
Klaus, E., & Kaciaf, N. (2024) · Politiques de communication · doi:10.3917/pdc.022.0005 · Cited by 4
Micek, C., & Solovey, E. (2024) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwae036 · Cited by 3
Spiking up anger, nostalgia and disgust: The polarized dynamics of Turkish women’s volleyball
Kösen, M. G., & Erdoğan, E. (2025) · Mediterranean Politics · doi:10.1080/13629395.2024.2420473 · Cited by 3
Is trust a zero-sum game? What happens when institutional sources get it wrong
Dawson, A., Bista, A., & Wilson, A. E. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0321743 · Cited by 3
Self-citationUnited or Divided? A Polarized Society’s Response to War
Feinstein, Y., & Ben-David, G. (2026) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfag014 · Cited by 3
Redesigning algorithms to intervene on social norm misperceptions during a national election
Brady, W. J., Doyle, M., Elnakouri, A., Finkel, E. J., Jackson, J. C., Kteily, N., Parker, V., Puryear, C., Spelman, T., Teeny, J. D., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10536-1 · Cited by 10
Self-citationMurphey, H. L. (2023) · The Journal of North African Studies · doi:10.1080/13629387.2023.2183388 · Cited by 3
Mahmutović, M., & Lovec, M. (2024) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2024.2383903 · Cited by 3
Why partisans feel hated: Distinct static and dynamic relationships with animosity meta-perceptions
Lees, J. M., Cikara, M., & Druckman, J. N. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae324 · Cited by 3
Dawson, A., Wang, W., Taylor, M., Ingram, B., Gibson, S., & Wilson, A. E. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12794 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M.
- Affiliations
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Anne E
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 34
- Pages
- 223-228
- ISSN
- 2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3058235320
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 21.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- political polarization, affective polarization, ideological polarization, political elites, partisan media, social media dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review