The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“teachers who believe that using technology would enhance their job performance (i.e., perceived usefulness; Teo, 2011) put more emphasis on developing their students' ICT literacy.”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Teo, 2011
In the citing paper
“This model aims to identify the level of teachers' acceptance of ICT and hence predict to what extent they are prepared to teach with ICT.”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Teo, 2011
In the citing paper
“While perceived usefulness plays a crucial role in providing functional advantages, perceived enjoyment is equally vital for its emotional benefits, as outlined by Teo [33].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“These findings emphasize that AI adoption is not merely a personal decision, but one shaped by interpersonal trust networks and institutional enablers, aligning with Teo (2011) [73], Zhao & Frank (2003) [74].”
From From Perception to Practice: Artificial Intelligence as a Pathway to Enhancing Digital Literacy in Higher Education Teaching (2025) · cites this paper as Teo (2011) [73]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-09-2014-0088 · Cited by 1,339
“…opinion Carter and Schaupp (2009), Chan et al. (2010), Chiu et al. (2010), Chiu and Wang (2008), Sahu and Gupta (2007), Schaupp et al. (2010), Teo (2011) No moderating variables 6 No moderating variables used Al-Sobhi et al. (2011), Chen et al. (2008), Huser et al. (2010), Loo et al. (2009),…”
BackgroundInfluentialRaza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120960421 · Cited by 510
“According to Teo (2011), technology acceptance is the willingness of an individual to adopt the use of technology for facilitating task performance based on the support it was designed to provide.”
BackgroundElkaseh, A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2015) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.683 · Cited by 335
Pan, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294 · Cited by 329
“Using this theory and analysis method, later in the educational landscape, there were studies that verified and explained the intention of students’ technology use (Teo, 2011) and the research of students’ independent use of technology for language learning (Lai, 2013), etc.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialUnpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis
Scherer, R., & Teo, T. P. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.001 · Cited by 399
Self-citationOkay, Google!: An empirical study on voice assistants on consumer engagement and loyalty
Moriuchi, E. (2019) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21192 · Cited by 307
Jang, J., Ko, Y., Shin, W. S., & Han, I. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3048708 · Cited by 334
“technology is easy to use [66] and useful for instruction [79], [91].”
BackgroundResultAcceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies
Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A. J.-C., Ayupp, K., Radović-Marković, M. M., & Ali, S. (2017) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-06-2016-0015 · Cited by 348
“(2015), UTAUT is one of the extensively used models for testing the acceptance and use of various technologies in a number of different studies (e.g. Farooq et al., 2016; Ketterl et al., 2011; Nair et al., 2015; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodSánchez‐Prieto, J. C., Migueláñéz, S. O., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061 · Cited by 277
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269
Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006 · Cited by 313
Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003 · Cited by 339
“M Perceived ease of use also qualifies as a critical predictor of technology adoption (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundWatty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Education · doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003 · Cited by 254
Teo, T. P., & Zhou, M. (2014) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3 · Cited by 241
“Recent studies have provided evidence to show that perceived usefulness has influences on attitudes and intention to use technology (Teo 2008, 2011; Yuen 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChu, T.-H., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013 · Cited by 274
Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159 · Cited by 312
A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects
Aburbeian, A. M., Owda, A. Y., & Owda, M. (2022) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai3020018 · Cited by 285
“Table 2 shows that there is a negative correlation, weak positive correlation and moderate positive correlations between variables.”
BackgroundFactors Impacting Teachers’ Adoption of Mobile Learning
Callum, K. M., Jeffrey, L. M., & Kinshuk, N. A. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/1970 · Cited by 256
“Other studies have shown that anxiety about computer use will negatively influence an individual’s use and adoption of ICT in their teaching and learning (Phelps & Ellis, 2002; Teo, 2011; Wilfong, 2006).”
BackgroundTartavulea, C. V., Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Dieaconescu, R. I., & Petre, S. (2020) · Amfiteatru Economic · doi:10.24818/ea/2020/55/920 · Cited by 208
“The nature of the teaching and learning processes changes with the use of e-technologies (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundBackfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300 · Cited by 252
Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers
Teo, T. P., & Lee, C. B. (2010) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/10650741011033035 · Cited by 196
Self-citationScherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012 · Cited by 220
“Second, self-efficacy beliefs are important determinants for teachers’ intention to use and integrate technology for teaching and learning (Scherer, Siddiq, & Teo, 2015; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundLachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304 · Cited by 248
The Influence of Values on E-learning Adoption
Mehta, A., Morris, N. P., Swinnerton, B. J., & Homer, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617 · Cited by 214
“The direct e ff ect of social in fl uence on learner intention was non-signi fi cant supporting prior literature (Teo, 2011; Terzis & Economides, 2011) and meta-analysis (Taiwo & Downe, 2013).”
ResultChiu, Y.-T., Zhu, Y., & Corbett, J. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102379 · Cited by 206
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005 · Cited by 220
“…Ainley, 2013; Kikis, Scheuermann,& Villalba, 2009); and teachers' integration of ICT in classrooms on the other hand (Donnelly, McGarr, & O'Reilly, 2011; Hern andez-Ramos, Martínez-Abad, GarcíaPe~nalvo, HerreraGarcía, & Rodríguez-Conde, 2014; Sang, Valcke, van Braak, & Tondeur, 2010; Teo, 2011a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRevisiting teachers’ computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences
Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.038 · Cited by 170
Factors impacting special education teachers’ acceptance and actual use of technology
Siyam, N. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-018-09859-y · Cited by 136
“Teachers are considered key players in the effective integration of technology in teaching and learning (Zhao et al. 2001; Teo 2011a).”
BackgroundTechnology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter?
Teo, T. P., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1672 · Cited by 164
“More recently, educational researchers (e.g., Teo, 2011; Teo, 2012; Teo & Wong, 2013) have extended TAM into education settings, investigating the issues in technology acceptance and use among school teachers.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLiu, H., Lin, C., & Zhang, D. (2017) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572 · Cited by 181
“The questionnaire was a version of those used by Teo (2011) and Chan and Elliott (2004), modi fi ed to suit the special circum-stances of the language teachers who participated in the current study.”
MethodWong, K., Teo, T. P., & Russo, S. G. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.796 · Cited by 147
“Many reports provide evidence of the impact of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on attitude toward usage and behavioural intention (Rasimah et al., 2011; Teo, 2011; Wong & Teo, 2009; Sumak, Hericko, Pusnik & Polancic, 2011).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationThe strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools
Nalda, F. N., Emeterio, M. C. S., Fernández-Ortiz, R., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481 · Cited by 248
Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers
Wong, K., Teo, T. P., & Russo, S. G. (2012) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9 · Cited by 146
“Furthermore, many past empirical studies have used behavioural intention in explaining technology acceptance amongst student teachers (Teo 2011; Teo and Noyes 2011; Terzis and Econo-mides 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWang, K., Ruan, Q., Zhang, X., Fu, C., & Duan, B. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14050373 · Cited by 205
“…teachers’ instructional methods may face obstacles due to a range of challenges, including external factors such as insufficient support, a lack of essential technical resources, and curricular constraints, as well as internal factors like insufficient technical skills or low self-efficacy [17–19].”
BackgroundSánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002 · Cited by 205
“, 2003) and it has yielded good results in previous studies on teachers’ and students’ technology acceptance (Deshpande et al., 2012; Echeng et al., 2013; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundResultTeachers and technology: development of an extended theory of planned behavior
Teo, T. P., Zhou, M., & Noyes, J. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9446-5 · Cited by 170
“It was possible that experienced teachers did not have to rely on institutional mandate (e.g., school principal or department head) to decide whether or not to use technology (Robert and Henderson 2000; Teo 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationKabooha, R. H., & Elyas, T. (2018) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v11n2p72 · Cited by 168
Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202 · Cited by 137
Kim, J., & Lee, K. S.-S. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213 · Cited by 174
“…based on the studies conducted by Venkatesh et al. (2003), who used the UTAUT model to explore the acceptance of technologies; it was also based on studies conducted on the acceptance of digital learning technologies by teachers, such as OECD (2019c), Zalah (2018) and Teo (2011) (see Table 1).”
MethodÇiğdem, H., & Topçu, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049 · Cited by 136
Teo, T. P. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117749430 · Cited by 129
Self-citationNunes, A., Cordeiro, C., Limpo, T., & Castro, S. L. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12635 · Cited by 180
“Teachers are key players to foster the effective use of technology for learning and instruction and stimulate students' acceptance of technology (Davidson et al., 2014; Roscoe et al., 2017; Teo, 2011).”
Han, I., Shin, W. S., & Ko, Y. (2017) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1322057 · Cited by 124
Liao, Y.-K., Wu, W.-Y., Le, T. Q., & Phung, T. T. T. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020815 · Cited by 123
“Besides, while PU plays an important role in the utilitarian dimension of PV, PE is an essential dimension in e-learning users’ perception of hedonic PV [44].”
BackgroundTeo, T. P. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015 · Cited by 150
Self-citationAl-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14090845 · Cited by 126
“While perceived usefulness plays a crucial role in providing functional advantages, perceived enjoyment is equally vital for its emotional benefits, as outlined by Teo [33].”
Wong, K., Osman, R., Goh, P. S. C., & Rahmat, M. K. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 115
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Education and Science · doi:10.21890/ijres.81048 · Cited by 130
“As argued by Teo (2011), teachers’ positive attitudes towards the use of computers reinforce their intentions to use technology.”
BackgroundUnderstanding teacher technology integration from expectancy-value perspectives
Cheng, S.-L., Lu, L., Xie, K., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103062 · Cited by 115
Scherer, R., Rohatgi, A., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.034 · Cited by 121
“Prior research has shown that the integration of ICT depends, to a large extent, on student and teachers attitudes towards their ICT use (Hatlevik, Ottestad, & Throndsen, 2015; Mama & Hennessy, 2013; Prestridge, 2012; Sang, Valcke, Braak, & Tondeur, 2010; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundA test-based approach of Modeling and Measuring Technological Pedagogical Knowledge
Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Stürmer, K. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103645 · Cited by 132
Chou, C.-M., Shen, C.-H., Hsiao, H.-C., & Shen, T.-C. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1520201 · Cited by 109
“The results of this study were consistent with those of Teo (2011) and Hernandez-Ramos et al. (2014), who suggested that individual creativity is generated by identifying with an organizational environment.”
BackgroundResultTeo, T. P., & Milutinović, V. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1668 · Cited by 122
“This finding is consistent with recent studies that examined the influence of attitudes towards computer use among pre-service teachers in other countries (Teo, 2009, 2011; Yuen & Ma, 2008).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThongsri, N., Shen, L., & Bao, Y. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1585904 · Cited by 106
“For this reason, the study through the intention to use elearning variable has several advantages due to actual use possibly having several causes and delicate factors, which may not result in a comprehensive study (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundAl‐Adwan, A. S., Meet, R. K., Anand, S., Shukla, G. P., Alsharif, R., & Dabbaghia, M. N. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2343955 · Cited by 106
“This is because the affordances of educational technologies cannot be fully realized if educators do not implement these tools in intended pedagogically sound ways (Teo 2011).”
Huang, Y. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.010 · Cited by 105
Teachers’ motivation to adopt technology in higher education
Sharma, L., & Srivastava, M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-07-2018-0156 · Cited by 146
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır-Yalçın, E. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12834 · Cited by 103
Batucan, G., Gonzales, G. G., Balbuena, M. G., Pasaol, K. R. B., Seno, D. N., & Gonzales, R. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.768831 · Cited by 143
“Teo (2011) viewed technology acceptance as a person’s willingness to embrace technology to facilitate tasks based on the support it intends to provide.”
BackgroundAl-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111151 · Cited by 102
Bao, Y., Xiong, T., Hu, Z., & Kibelloh, M. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.49.1.e · Cited by 103
“All the ten model-fit measures of the proposed structural model were the same as those of the measure model, indicating a good model fit.”
MethodResultThe influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance
Teo, T. P., & Zhou, M. (2016) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844 · Cited by 122
“Ranging from three to fi ve items per factor, these items were adapted from published sources that displayed high reliability when the former were used with in-service or pre-service teachers (Teo, 2011, 2014; Teo & van Schaik, 2009; Wong & Teo, 2009; Wong, Teo, & Russo, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationValtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Mäkitalo, K., Hoang, N. Y., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöntinen, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12353 · Cited by 95
“Birch & Irvine, 2009; Teo, 2011; Teo & Tan,2012; Valtonen et al., 2015).”
The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology
Wong, G. K. W. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9426-9 · Cited by 108
“Based on Teo (2011) for instance, five significant constructs are included in the modeling of in-service teachers’ behavioral intention to use technology: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards computer use, subjective norm, and facilitating conditions.”
BackgroundLiu, H., Wang, L., & Koehler, M. J. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12824 · Cited by 101
Leem, J., & Sung, E. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12612 · Cited by 91
Khong, T. D. H., Çelik, İ., Le, T. T. T., Lai, V. T. T., Nguyen, A., & Bui, H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11417-6 · Cited by 91
“This finding is in line with TAM while similar Education and Information Technologies (2023) 28:5999–6026 results were reported in previous studies about teachers’ technology adoption (Joo et al., 2018; Khlaif et al., 2022; Scherer et al., 2019; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDeterminants of Teachers’ Attitudes Towards E-Learning in Tanzanian Higher Learning Institutions
Kisanga, S. E. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2720 · Cited by 99
“Technology, which is believed to be both important and personally relevant, is more likely to create people’s positive attitude towards it (Rogers 2003; Teo 2011).”
BackgroundSun, P. P., & Mei, B. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430 · Cited by 98
“Technology acceptance research Teo (2011) defines technology acceptance as “ a user ’ s willingness to employ technology for the tasks it is designed to support ” (p. 1).”
BackgroundThe Acceptance of Telepresence Robots in Higher Education
Lei, M., Clemente, I. M., Liu, H., & Bell, J. E. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00837-y · Cited by 94
“The items for use intention were adapted from Teo’s study [93].”
MethodÇiğdem, H., & Öztürk, M. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253 · Cited by 98
“While perceived ease of use exerts a direct impact on perceived usefulness, perceived usefulness together with perceived ease of use influences attitudes toward usage (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundLi, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, C., & Wei, X. L. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1540433 · Cited by 87
“Items regarding four constructs of TAM were adopted based on the questionnaire developed by Huang (2016) and Teo (2011), including PEU (e.g. ‘ I think that pigaiwang is easy to use ’ ), PU (e.g. ‘ Using pigaiwang , I can write much better ’ ), ATU (e.g. ‘ I like using pigaiwang to assist me in…”
MethodMartín‐García, A. V., Abad, F. M., & Reyes‐González, D. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12831 · Cited by 88
Doğan, S., Dogan, N., & Çelik, İ. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10310-4 · Cited by 129
“In many studies, perceived usefulness has been found to be the strongest factor directly affecting attitudes and intention to use ICT (Chien et al. 2014; Oye et al. 2014; Teo 2011).”
BackgroundChen, S., Liu, S.-C., Li, S.-H., & Yen, D. C. (2013) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-013-9981-0 · Cited by 87
“Additionally, PU has a significant impact on outcome variables [35, 51, 54], and PEOU has a direct and decisive impact on PU [49, 55].”
BackgroundBreakdowns in children's interactions with a robotic tutor: A longitudinal study
Serholt, S. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.030 · Cited by 82
Konstantinidou, E., & Scherer, R. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104424 · Cited by 108
Panagoulias, D. P., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123375 · Cited by 86
Teachers’ technology use for teaching: Comparing two explanatory mechanisms
Backfisch, I., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103390 · Cited by 98
Panagoulias, D. P., Sarmas, E., Marinakis, V., Virvou, M. K., Tsihrintzis, G. A., & Doukas, H. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12214430 · Cited by 75
“Although not directly focused on technology literacy, research studies such as [48] investigate the relationship between computer self-efficacy, facilitating conditions, and perceived usefulness, which may be related to technology literacy.”
Understanding perceptions of academics toward technology acceptance in accounting education
Al‐Hattami, H. M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13141 · Cited by 89
“This result is consistent with [19,33,37,38], and [17].”
BackgroundResultPredictors of Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Preservice Teachers
Birişçi, S., & Kul, Ü. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cet.512537 · Cited by 73
“It is possible to accept the self-efficacy beliefs of teachers in the context of technology integration is related to the necessity of including technological skills within the scope of educational activities (Albion, 1999; Chen, 2008; Ertmer, 2005; Ruggiero & Mong, 2015; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundHatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.022 · Cited by 83
Al‐Debei, M. M., Jalal, D., & Al-Lozi, E. M. (2013) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2013.055555 · Cited by 72
“Three items of these five were based on the measures of behavioural intention as defined by Teo (2011), and these measures are: the intention to continue using a technology in the future, the expectation to use a technology in the future, and the planning to use a technology in the future.”
Multi-expert and multi-criteria evaluation of Online Education Factors: A fuzzy AHP approach
Kukreja, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of engineering education transformations/Journal of engineering education transformation · doi:10.16920/jeet/2021/v35i2/22081 · Cited by 69
“The authors (Teo, 2011 (Kearns, 2012).”
Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs in the Classroom
Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2016) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1215172 · Cited by 72
“Although previous studies have been conducted on technology acceptance among classroom teachers (Ifenthaler & Schweinbenz, 2013; Teo, 2011), preservice teachers (Cullen & Greene, 2011; Teo, 2009; Teo, Lee, & Chai, 2008), and in higher education in general (El-Gayar et al., 2011; Moran, Hawkes, &…”
Achieving continued usage in online banking: a post-adoption study
Oertzen, A.-S., & Odekerken‐Schröder, G. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0239 · Cited by 69
“Customers ’ attitudes influence their intentions to use a digitalised service, as well as their behavioural use (Davis et al. , 1989; Sreejesh et al. , 2016; Teo, 2011; Venkatesh and Davis, 2000).”
BackgroundXie, K., Nelson, M. J., Cheng, S., & Jiang, Z. (2021) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2021.1951404 · Cited by 90
“…value beliefs as a global construct that encompasses belief factors used in the literature including perceived enjoyment, perceived importance, perceived usefulness, and any combination of these dimensions (Ottenbreit-Leftwich et al., 2010; Scherer et al., 2019; Teo, 2011; Wozney et al., 2006).”
BackgroundDiño, M. J. S., & de Guzman, A. B. (2014) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2014.917236 · Cited by 66
“…& Mazza, 2013; McKenna, Tuunanen, & Gardner, 2013; Chong, 2013); education (e.g., Ersoy & Akbulut, 2014; Ho, Hung & Chen, 2013; Huang, Hood, & Yoo, 2013; Teo, 2011); and mobile computing (e.g., Nikou & Bouwman, 2014; Shafinah, Sahari, Sulaiman, Yusoff, & Ikram, 2013; Fuksa, 2013), among others.”
MethodChen, C.-P. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.015 · Cited by 66
Dalvi‐Esfahani, M., Leong, L. W., Ibrahim, O., & Nilashi, M. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118805211 · Cited by 68
“…important in motivating students’ behavioral intention toward the use of e-learning (Baker et al., 2007; Sawang et al., 2014), while in the study by Teo (2011), the author reported that the impact of subjective norm on teachers’ intention to adopt new technologies in their classes was…”
BackgroundResultCabellos, B., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107994 · Cited by 115
Adopting Digital Tools in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges and Theoretical Insights
Mexhuani, B. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12819 · Cited by 115
Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Adopt Technology in Their Future Classrooms
Li, K., Li, Y., & Franklin, T. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116641694 · Cited by 80
“TAM had been applied in the field of technology integration in education (Holden & Rada, 2011; Ma, Andersson, & Streith, 2005; Teo, 2011).”
MethodAdopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation
Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento‐Márquez, E. M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., & Poom‐Valickis, K. (2021) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113 · Cited by 74
“For example, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) by Venkatesh et al. (2003) that integrates a number of models on technology acceptance has found broad applications in modelling teacher readiness to adopt technological innovations in schools (e.g. Teo 2011).”
BackgroundAcceptance and Use of Lecture Capture System (LCS) in Executive Business Studies: Extending UTAUT2
Muhammad Shoaib, F., Maimoona, S., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A. J.-C., Ayupp, K., Radović-Marković, M. M., & Ali, S. (2017) · Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak) · Cited by 64
Digital Literacy of EFL Students: An Empirical Study in Vietnamese Universities
Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2021) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2020-0165 · Cited by 80
“ICT competency covers many fi elds in the realm of technology, such as ICT literacy, digital literacy, information literacy, computer literacy, technology literacy, and advanced and professional skills (Tristán-López and Ylizaliturri-Salcedo 2014).”
BackgroundGalatsopoulou, F., Kenterelidou, C., Kotsakis, R., & Matsiola, M. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12020074 · Cited by 83
“ATU is defined as the extent to which a student, in our case, possesses positive feelings about using technology, specifically videos in courses [49].”
BackgroundHsu, Y.-Y., & Lin, C. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00205-2 · Cited by 74
“These were the effect of each training strategy, as revealed by SQD-scale data; the training ’ s impact on the participant teachers ’ TPACK-practical knowledge (Yeh et al., 2014); and the training ’ s impact on technology acceptance, as measured by Teo ’ s (2011) scales.”
MethodTechnological readiness and its impact on mobile payment usage: A case study of go-pay
Rahardja, U., Hapsari, I. D., Putra, P. O. H., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2023) · Cogent Engineering · doi:10.1080/23311916.2023.2171566 · Cited by 60
“This statement is in line with research conducted by Luarn and Lin (2005), Teo (2011), Zhang et al. (2012), and Alhassan et al. (2020), that perceived ease of use significantly affects user intentions.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Teo, T.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Teo, Timothy
- ORCID
- Teo, Timothy
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2432-2440
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064430399
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 180 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 43.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- technology integration in teaching, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norms, facilitating conditions, technology acceptance model, teacher technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review