Cited by 309Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Valuation and decision-making in frontal cortex: one or many serial or parallel systems?

Rushworth, Matthew FS, Kolling, Nils, Sallet, Jérôme, Mars, Rogier B·2012·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

We evaluate the merits of different conceptualizations of frontal cortex function in value-guided decision-making. According to one view each frontal cortical region is concerned with a different aspect of the process of learning about and evaluating choices and then selecting actions. An alternative view, however, sees sets of decision-making circuits working in parallel within the frontal lobes in order to make different types of decisions. While there is a neural circuit for making choices between pairs of simultaneously presented items in the manner that is frequently assessed in the laboratory, there is also evidence that other frontal lobe circuits have evolved to make other types of choices such as those made during the course of foraging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2012.04.011

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The OFC projects reward value information to the anterior cingulate cortex, where it is used to provide reward outcomes for action-outcome learning.

    “The OFC projects reward value information to the anterior cingulate cortex, where it is used to provide the reward outcomes for action–outcome learning (Rushworth et al., 2012; Rolls, 2019a,c).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Rushworth et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rushworth, M. F., Kolling, N., Sallet, J., & Mars, R. B.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rushworth, Matthew FS
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
946-955
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015480153
Cited by
309
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MRC
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
frontal cortex, reward valuation, neural circuits, foraging decisions, choice behavior, action selection
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Models, Psychological, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review