Cited by 195Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Double Dissociation of Stimulus-Value and Action-Value Learning in Humans with Orbitofrontal or Anterior Cingulate Cortex Damage

Open access
Camille, Nathalie, Tsuchida, Ami, Fellows, Lesley K.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Adaptive decision making involves selecting the most valuable option, typically by taking an action. Such choices require value comparisons, but there is debate about whether these comparisons occur at the level of stimuli (goods-based) value, action-based value, or both. One view is that value processes occur in series, with stimulus value informing action value. However, lesion work in nonhuman primates suggests that these two kinds of choice are dissociable. Here, we examined action-value and stimulus-value learning in humans with focal frontal lobe damage. Orbitofrontal damage disrupted the ability to sustain the correct choice of stimulus, but not of action, after positive feedback, while damage centered on dorsal anterior cingulate cortex led to the opposite deficit. These findings argue that there are distinct, domain-specific mechanisms by which outcome value is applied to guide subsequent decisions, depending on whether the choice is between stimuli or between actions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3164-11.2011

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OFC encodes outcome-related information during Pavlovian (cue-outcome) learning rather than during instrumental (action-outcome) learning, while ACC shows the opposite contribution.

    “In line with this, comparative studies of ACC and OFC highlight their dissociative roles in encoding outcome value; the OFC encodes outcome-related information during Pavlovian (cue-outcome) learning rather than during the instrumental (action-outcome) learning, while the opposite contribution is found in the ACC47,48.”

    From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion (page not available) reports a double dissociation: OFC damage impaired value-based choices between stimuli but not actions, while dACC damage showed the opposite pattern. The Materials and Methods describe choices followed by reward feedback, not a separate Pavlovian cue–outcome task; the lesion results also do not directly measure neural encoding. Thus the regional dissociation is supported, but the claim's Pavlovian-versus-instrumental framing is not established by this study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Human lesion data has led to the suggestion that orbital prefrontal cortex implements encoding of stimulus value with dorsal cingulate cortex implementing encoding of action value.

    “We note also that human lesion data has led to the suggestion that orbital prefrontal cortex implements encoding of stimulus value with dorsal cingulate cortex implementing encoding of action value (Camille et al., 2011).”

    From Goals and Habits in the Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Camille et al., 2011

  • The anterior cingulate cortex appears to be involved in learning actions to obtain rewards (action-outcome learning), where the outcome refers to the reward or punisher for which an action is being learned.

    “However, the anterior cingulate cortex appears to be involved in learning actions to obtain rewards (action–outcome learning), where the outcome refers to the reward or punisher for which an action is being learned (Rudebeck et al., 2008; Camille et al., 2011; Rushworth et al., 2011, 2012; Rolls, 2019b,c).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Camille et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camille, N., Tsuchida, A., & Fellows, L. K.
Affiliations
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Fellows, Lesley K.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-10-19
Volume
31
Issue
42
Pages
15048-15052
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2102726432
Cited by
195
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (97821_1, MOP-77583)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, frontal lobe lesions, adaptive decision-making, value-based choice, positive feedback, outcome value
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reward, Case-Control Studies, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review