Cited by 13Smoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Implicit and explicit reward learning in chronic nicotine use

Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne, Paelecke, Marko, Giegerich, Katharina, Reschke, Katja, Kübler, Andrea·2013·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Chronic tobacco use is related to specific neurobiological alterations in the dopaminergic brain reward system that can be termed "reward deficiency syndrome" in dependent nicotine consumers. The close linkage of dopaminergic activity and reward learning led us to expect implicit and explicit reward learning deficits in dependent compared to non-smokers. Smokers who maintain a less regular, occasional use may also, to a lesser extent, show implicit reward learning deficits. The purpose of our study was to examine the behavioral effects of the neurobiological alterations on reward related learning. We also tested whether any deficits observed in an abstinent state are also present in a satiated state.Methods In two studies, we examined implicit and explicit reward learning in smokers. Participants were administered a probabilistic implicit reward learning task, and an explicit reward- and punishment-based trial-and-error learning task. In Study 1, we compared dependent, occasional, and non-smokers, and in Study 2 satiated and abstinent smokers.Results In Study 1, chronic and occasional smokers showed impairments in both, implicit and explicit reward learning tasks. In Study 2, satiated smokers did not perform better than abstinent smokers.Conclusions The results support the hypothesis of reward learning deficits. These deficits are not limited to explicit but extend to implicit reward learning and cannot be explained by tobacco withdrawal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.09.004

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paelecke-Habermann, Y., Paelecke, M., Giegerich, K., Reschke, K., & Kübler, A.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
129
Issue
1-2
Pages
8-17
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050859126
Cited by
13
References
76
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
reward learning, nicotine dependence, implicit learning, explicit learning, reward deficiency syndrome, dopaminergic reward system, satiation, nicotine withdrawal
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Attention, Chronic Disease, Cues, Depression, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Learning, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Satiation, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review