Cited by 185Smoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Nicotine Dependence Is Characterized by Disordered Reward Processing in a Network Driving Motivation

Bühler, Mira, Vollstädt-Klein, Sabine, Kobiella, Andrea, Budde, Henning, Reed, Laurence J., Braus, Dieter F., Büchel, Christian, Smolka, Michael N.·2010·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Drug addiction is characterized by an unhealthy priority for drug consumption with a compulsive, uncontrolled drug-intake pattern due to a disordered motivational system. However, only some individuals become addicted, whereas others maintain regular but controlled drug use. Whether the transition occurs might depend on how individuals process drug relative to nondrug reward.Methods We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure mesocorticolimbic activity to stimuli predicting monetary or cigarette reward, together with behavioral assessment of subsequent motivation to obtain the respective reward on a trial-by-trial basis, in 21 nicotine-dependent and 21 nondependent, occasional smokers.Results Occasional smokers showed increased reactivity of the mesocorticolimbic system to stimuli predicting monetary reward relative to cigarette reward and subsequently spent more effort to obtain money. In the group of dependent smokers, we found equivalent anticipatory activity and subsequent instrumental response rates for both reward types. Additionally, anticipatory mesocorticolimbic activation predicted subsequent motivation to obtain reward.Conclusions This imbalance in the incentive salience of drug relative to nondrug reward-predicting cues, in a network that drives motivation to obtain reward, could represent a central mechanism of drug addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.029

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bühler, M., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Kobiella, A., Budde, H., Reed, L. J., Braus, D. F., Büchel, C., & Smolka, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Neuroimaging Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Smolka, Michael N.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
745-752
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988708433
Cited by
185
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SM 80/1-1, SM 80/1-2, SM 80/5-1)
  • Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
nicotine dependence, drug addiction, reward processing, incentive salience, mesocorticolimbic system, motivation, monetary rewards, occasional smokers
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cerebral Cortex, Cues, Humans, Functional Laterality, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motivation, Nerve Net, Oxygen, Reward, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review