Cited by 335Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The neurobiology and genetics of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): What every clinician should know

Cortese, Samuele·2012·European Journal of Paediatric Neurology

Abstract

This review, addressed mainly to clinicians, considers commonly asked questions related to the neuroimaging, neurophysiology, neurochemistry and genetics of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It provides answers based on the most recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews, as well as additional relevant original studies. Empirical findings from neurobiological research into ADHD reflect a shift in the conceptualisation of this disorder from simple theoretical views of a few isolated dysfunctions to more complex models integrating the heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations of ADHD. Thus, findings from structural and functional neuroimaging suggest the involvement of developmentally abnormal brain networks related to cognition, attention, emotion and sensorimotor functions. Brain functioning alterations are confirmed by neurophysiological findings, showing that individuals with ADHD have elevated theta/beta power ratios, and less pronounced responses and longer latencies of event-related potentials, compared with controls. At a molecular level, alterations in any single neurotransmitter system are unlikely to explain the complexity of ADHD; rather, the disorder has been linked to dysfunctions in several systems, including the dopaminergic, adrenergic, serotoninergic and cholinergic pathways. Genetic studies showing a heritability of ∼60-75% suggest that a plethora of genes, each one with a small but significant effect, interact with environmental factors to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.01.009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cortese, S.
Affiliations
Université de Tours (FR)
Corresponding author
Cortese, Samuele
Venue
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
422-433
ISSN
1090-3798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109413825
Cited by
335
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Paediatric Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, neurobiology of ADHD, ADHD genetics, heritability, neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging, neurophysiology, event-related potentials, neurotransmitter systems, dopaminergic system, adrenergic system, serotonin, cholinergic system, brain networks, gene-environment interaction, clinical implications
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review