Cited by 616Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Effects of nanoplastics and microplastics on toxicity, bioaccumulation, and environmental fate of phenanthrene in fresh water

Ma, Yini, Huang, Anna, Cao, Siqi, Sun, Feifei, Wang, Lianhong, Guo, Hongyan, Ji, Rong·2016·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Contamination of fine plastic particles (FPs), including micrometer to millimeter plastics (MPs) and nanometer plastics (NPs), in the environment has caught great concerns. FPs are strong adsorbents for hydrophobic toxic pollutants and may affect their fate and toxicity in the environment; however, such information is still rare. We studied joint toxicity of FPs with phenanthrene to Daphnia magna and effects of FPs on the environmental fate and bioaccumulation of 14 C-phenanthrene in fresh water. Within the five sizes particles we tested (from 50 nm to 10 μm), 50-nm NPs showed significant toxicity and physical damage to D. magna. The joint toxicity of 50-nm NPs and phenanthrene to D. magna showed an additive effect. During a 14-days incubation, the presence of NPs significantly enhanced bioaccumulation of phenanthrene-derived residues in daphnid body and inhibited the dissipation and transformation of phenanthrene in the medium, while 10-μm MPs did not show significant effects on the bioaccumulation, dissipation, and transformation of phenanthrene. The differences may be attributed to higher adsorption of phenanthrene on 50-nm NPs than 10-μm MPs. Our findings underlined the high potential ecological risks of FPs, and suggested that NPs should be given more concerns, in terms of their interaction with hydrophobic pollutants in the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.061

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Daphnia magna exposed to nanoplastics showed increased toxicity, physical damage and higher mortality rates as a function of nanoplastic exposure.

    “The results of the studies have shown an increased toxicity, physical damage and higher mortality rates of Daphnia as a function of nanoplastic exposure.”

    From The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview (2021) · cites this paper as [154]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Y., Huang, A., Cao, S., Sun, F., Wang, L., Guo, H., & Ji, R.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (CN)
Corresponding author
Ji, Rong
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
219
Pages
166-173
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2546045035
Cited by
616
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 9
FWCI
20.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • gs1:National Natural Science Foundation of China (21407075)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M561624)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
nanoplastics, microplastics, phenanthrene, Daphnia magna, combined toxicity, bioaccumulation, environmental fate, adsorption, additive toxicity, freshwater, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, plastic particle size, ecological risk
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Animals, Biological Availability, Daphnia, Environmental Monitoring, Fresh Water, Particle Size, Phenanthrenes, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review