Cited by 221Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchWater Treatment and DisinfectionFluoride Effects and Removal

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 21 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Evaluation of a national data set for insights into sources, composition, and concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in U.S. drinking water

Open access
Guelfo, Jennifer L., Adamson, David T.·2018·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) completed nationwide screening of six perfluoroalkyl substances in U.S. drinking water from 2013–2015 under the Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3). UCMR3 efforts yielded a dataset of 36,139 samples containing analytical results from >5,000 public water systems (PWSs). This study used UCMR3 data to investigate three aspects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water: the occurrence of PFAS and co-contaminant mixtures, trends in PFAS detections relative to PWS characteristics and potential release types, and temporal trends in PFAS occurrence. This was achieved through bivariate and multivariate analyses including categorical analysis, concentration ratios, and hierarchical cluster analysis. Approximately 50% of samples with PFAS detections contained ≥2 PFASs, and 72% of detections occurred in groundwater. Large PWSs (>10,000 customers) were 5.6 times more likely than small PWSs (≤10,000 customers) to exhibit PFAS detections; however, when detected, median total PFAS concentrations were higher in small PWSs (0.12 μg/L) than in large (0.053 μg/L). Bivariate and multivariate analyses of PFAS composition suggested PWSs reflect impacts due to firefighting foam use and WWTP effluent as compared to other source types for which data were available. Mann-Kendall analysis of quarterly total PFAS detection rates indicated an increasing trend over time (p=0.03). UCMR3 data provide a foundation for tiered design of targeted sampling and analysis plans to address remaining knowledge gaps in the sources, composition, and concentrations of PFASs in U.S. drinking water.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.066

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 21 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 78 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The six PFASs monitored in UCMR3 are sufficient to characterize PFAS mixtures and infer sources in U.S. drinking water.

    “Occurrence of these additional PFASs in UCMR3 was not evaluated, but results of previous studies suggest there will be instances where they occur.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Concentration ratios of PFAS pairs in UCMR3 can be compared with ratios from AFFF-impacted groundwater, WWTP effluent, and fluoropolymer manufacturing to infer source types.

    “These six pairs were further examined by comparing ranges of ratios that occurred within samples to ratios measured in AFFF-impacted groundwater, WWTP effluent, and fluoropolymer manufacturing (Figure 2).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Data from small public water systems using groundwater are representative of private wells.

    “To better understand resulting knowledge gaps, data from small PWSs using groundwater were assumed to be representative of private wells.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting counts of water systems in the PFAS dataset

    Minor

    The abstract says the PFAS dataset includes results from more than 5,000 public water systems, but the results say 4,920 systems were analyzed for PFASs.

  • Conflicting counts of samples analyzed for PFASs

    Minor

    The methods report 36,139 PFAS samples, while the results report 36,977 for the same monitoring program.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kissa, 2001, Fluorinated surfactants and repellents, second edition revised and expanded

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Guelfo, J. L., & Adamson, D. T.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • GSI Environmental (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Guelfo, Jennifer L.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
236
Pages
505-513
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793001426
Cited by
216
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (2P42 ES013660)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, drinking water contamination, public water systems, groundwater contamination, firefighting foam, wastewater treatment plant effluent, temporal trends, source apportionment, concentration ratio
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, United States, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Government Regulation, Groundwater, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review