The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 6 are not checked yet; 6 of the 77 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Smart, circular and renewable: The role of cooperative governance in accelerating a sustainable energy transition
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of renewable energy contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals but also leads to waste issues and critical raw material dependencies. It is therefore important to study circular economy (CE) strategies for renewables to mitigate these challenges, while ensuring broad social participation and enhancing community and business resilience. We apply market failure and cooperative theory to explore how cooperative governance can enable and embed circularity in smart grids. Using a case study of a smart grid project in Belgium, we identify key barriers and enablers for fostering circular outcomes. Our findings suggest that cooperative governance can mitigate market failures involved, such as split incentives and asymmetric information, resolving missing markets and facilitating the integration of CE strategies in smart grids. Analysing design-implementation gaps and boundary conditions for scaling and replication highlights the importance of overcoming regulatory barriers and engaging stakeholders through compelling value propositions. While cooperatives are a promising model for advancing sustainable energy transitions, they require regulatory support and community involvement to realise their full potential. Smart grid development may be shaped by regional institutional contexts but the insights on cooperatives derived from this study have a broad international relevance given the globally applied and comparable framework employed.
Verified 2026-11-10 · 6 references not checked yet
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper examines a Belgian smart grid demonstrator to ask how cooperative governance can enable and embed circular economy strategies while mitigating market failures. It finds cooperatives can help address split incentives, asymmetric information, and missing markets, but regulatory barriers and weak stakeholder engagement prevented a full cooperative from being established at the case site.
Key findings
- Circular strategies in the smart grid faced market failures including asymmetric information, incomplete markets, market power, and unaccounted externalities. For distributed generation, reuse was hindered by screening costs, missing standards/warranties, high labour costs, and cheap new PV (one respondent noted PV is about 20% of a project’s cost); for storage, repurposed EV battery markets were developing but access to battery management system data was limited by car manufacturers.
- Enablers identified include second-hand markets, digital product passports and warranties, collection/testing/refurbishment infrastructure, modular design, product taxes, public procurement, regulatory sandboxes, dynamic pricing, and energy management systems.
- Applying ICA cooperative principles, respondents saw potential to mitigate market failures: open membership can internalise externalities, democratic control can reduce agency problems, economic participation can align total-cost-of-ownership thinking, education can internalise positive externalities, cooperation among cooperatives can build scale, and concern for community can address externalities. However, regulatory barriers caused failure on the 3rd and 4th ICA principles, rendering the first two redundant.
- No cooperative was established at the Transfo site: regulatory bodies lacked engagement and private household participation remained limited to nonexistent. The project negotiated with the DSO to construct and maintain the network as a DC test bed for ten years, and faced delays from COVID-19 and the Flemish decree on energy communities (2021).
Methods
- Action-based single case study of the RE/SOURCED smart grid at the Transfo site in Zwevegem, Belgium, conducted from 2020 to 2024, with participatory observation, project documentation, and 30 semi-structured interviews with 33 stakeholders lasting 45–80 minutes.
- Interviews included a premortem question asking why the project would fail within five years; data were coded in ATLAS.ti using content, narrative, thematic co-occurrence, and deductive coding for smart grid components, market failures, and ICA principles.
- Validity was supported through methodological, source, and theoretical triangulation, combining participatory observation, interviews, document analysis, market failure theory, and cooperative theory.
Limitations
- The paper states it is based on a single case study that encountered multiple barriers to implementing its initial ambitions, including failure to develop a full-scale operational cooperative; it calls for validation in other geographies and regulatory environments, especially the Global South.
- The paper states that market failure theory has blind spots, including the assumption that markets can align with a circular transition, and that ICA principles often fall short of their idealtypical representation in practice.
- Evident from the text: because no cooperative was actually established, the cooperative-governance findings are largely prospective or design-stage rather than observed operational outcomes; project delays and lack of market maturity also limited empirical testing of several circular strategies.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
45 Own interpretation · 42 Own result · 36 No basis given · 34 Not checked yet · 14 No full text of the sources · 9 Own method · 1 Supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“they can only be truly smart when there are people within it, as indicated earlier by [23,117]”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] [23] A.-R. Kojonsaari, J. Palm, The development of social science research on smart grids: a semi-structured literature review, Energy Sustain. Soc. 13 (2023) 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00381-9. - source
In “The domination of early adopters and professionals,” the review states that an early observation was that the only aspects of a smart grid that can truly be smart are the people within it. This directly supports the citing sentence’s paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [117] [117] A. Kumar, Beyond technical smartness: rethinking the development and implementation of sociotechnical smart grids in India, energy res, Soc. Sci. 49 (2019) 158 -168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.026. - source
The Introduction argues that technologies are not inherently smart unless they account for social context and that grids should respond to consumer needs. Section 2.2.1 describes smart grids as depending on configurations of users and social relationships, supporting the claim's emphasis on people as part of smartness. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the reuse of early decommissioned renewableas have been recognised as both an opportunity and a challenge to implement CE strategies within the smart grid.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, installing DC-grids is challenging, firstly because of the need for specialised DC components, which soon appeared to be less available or standardised than AC components.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, public procurement processes in this case study revealed that introducing public procurement criteria rewarding the use of secondhand materials and components was insufficient to spur the develop ment of reuse markets.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ensuring that new installations comply with the aesthetic requirements of heritage sites can be costly as it often involves additional expenses for designing and implementing solutions that are visually acceptable.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, inte grating modern energy solutions into heritage sites often involves significant costs for restoration and adaptation, as became clear throughout the project.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the procurement stage pointed out that there is a limited supply of advanced inverters that can handle the specific requirements of DC-grids.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interview respondents therefore identify battery product passports and eco-design rules as major enablers for repurposed batteries.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Repurposing EV batteries was the main circular strategy regarding energy storage in this case.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, DC grids suffer from incomplete markets stemming from incomplete regulatory standards and frameworks.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 100
- It may state two separate claims as one. 66
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The governance model of cooperatives has been described by Ostrom (1990) as one of the best solutions for the management of common resources [18].”
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [18] [18] B. Huybrechts, S. Mertens, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 85 (2014) 193 -212, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/apce.12038. - sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The bibliography lists Ostrom (1990), but the passages from the article discuss the assets and limits of renewable-energy cooperatives, not Ostrom’s assessment of cooperative governance. Searches for Ostrom, common-resource management, and the claimed ‘best solutions’ characterization found no passage stating that assessment. (LLM, conf=0.74)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ARCH has been receiving recognition for its diversified applicability of a CE [44,45].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [44] [44] D. Ikiz Kaya, N. Pintossi, G. Dane, An empirical analysis of driving factors and policy enablers of heritage adaptive reuse within the circular economy framework, Sustainability 13 (2021) 2479, https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13052479. - source
The Introduction says adaptive reuse of cultural heritage is recognized as a driver of circularity and describes environmental, cultural, and economic benefits. Section 3.1 also describes its recognition in policy frameworks spanning heritage, energy, and the circular economy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [45] [45] O.M. Owojori, C.S. Okoro, N. Chileshe, Current status and emerging trends on the adaptive reuse of buildings: a bibliometric analysis, Sustainability 13 (2021) 11646, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111646. - sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1.1 (page unavailable) describes cultural heritage and the transition to a circular economy as applications of adaptive reuse of buildings. Section 3.1 (page unavailable) discusses growing recognition of sustainable development and expected growth in circular-economy and adaptive-reuse research. These passages support the connection, but do not establish that adaptive reuse of cultural heritage specifically has gained recognition because of its diverse circular-economy applications. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Other research highlights the role of self-enforced arrangements in fostering long-term stakeholder relations [54] and the need for polycentric governance to manage competitive and cooperative tensions [65].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [54] [54] M. de Reuver, T. van der Lei, Z. Lukszo, How should grid operators govern smart grid innovation projects? An embedded case study approach, Energy Policy 97 (2016) 628 -635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.011. - source
Section 2.1 links self-enforced arrangements, including trust and financial co-investment, to the value of long-term relationships. The polycentric-governance clause has a separate citation and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] [65] M. Grimley, G. Chan, ' Cooperative is an oxymoron! ' : a polycentric energy transition perspective on distributed energy deployment in the upper Midwestern United States, Energy Policy 172 (2023) 113328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2022.113328. - source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, the apparent absence of standardised protocols and certifications for DC grids further complicates interoperability and reliability, leading to higher costs and risks.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, inte grating inverters into a DC-grid with both DC and AC components can be complex, which often necessitates specialised technical knowledge, leading to higher installation and operational costs and a slower implementation of the project.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, although the initial capital expenditure (CAPEX) may be higher, innovations such as DC grids reduce conversion losses and improve energy efficiency, benefiting operational expenditures (OPEX).”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, unclear regulatory frameworks for DC systems add uncertainty and risk for developers, including a lack of guidelines for certification and approval of DC installations, which became clear throughout the project.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, ensuring consistent performance over time requires regular maintenance, as inverters are expensive to replace or repair.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirdly, over time, CE strategies could promote new business models, such as service contracts and performance-based systems, aligning financial incentives with asset longevity.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the heritage site caused multiple underground uncertainties: not knowing the full legacy of underground cables, tanks, and other infra structure caused multiple challenges to install a new grid.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“both environmental as social externalities of using new renewables are unaccounted for, resulting in a market failure to prioritise reuse.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, it improves resource effi ciency, extending the lifecycle of components such as batteries and PV panels, mitigating waste and resource use.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A fi rst barrier involves asymmetric in formation, as reuse involves large screening costs to find second-life devices, resulting in incomplete markets.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contrary to the reuse of energy generation appliances, the procurement stage of this case revealed that markets are clearly developing to offer repurposed EV batteries, resulting in a tangible offer by multiple parties responding to the public tender in this project.”
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, CE in smart grids can engage local communities by demonstrating the tangible benefits of sustainability, showcasing that successful CE applications can serve as educational tools.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, inter view respondents point at a lack of incorporating environmental and social externalities of producing new batteries.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a circularity perspective, the ex pected lifespan of inverters is a key but very uncertain parameter, as pointed out by suppliers and experts.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Insufficient regulations and standards for reuse and refurbishment lead to challenges in ensuring consistent quality and performance, causing concerns about hidden defects and reduced performance, which can lead to additional main tenance and early replacement.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, high labour costs to dismantle, test, and recommission renewables, as well as decreasing prices of new devices render the business case for reuse unattractive.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, split incentives be tween grid designers and end users who eventually pay the bills of en ergy use, lead to suboptimal adoption rates.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Repurposing the heritage site inherently contributes to circularity out comes but encompasses some specific challenges as well.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, the process for obtaining approvals to modify heritage sites is often lengthy and complex.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A second enabler identified is reducing informational asymmetries by means of improved digital product passport or a coherent system of warranties.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is reinforced by a lack of access to historical data from battery management systems (BMS) which is a consequence of market power by car manufacturers.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, community development, such as implementing cooperative models, have been suggested to provide shared smart ser vices that are both more accessible and attractive to a wider range of users, as well as incentivizing to keep on engaging stakeholders to embrace circular solutions in the long term.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other respondents prefer a multistakeholder setting in which citizens, businesses, and public authorities would join as different stakeholders, each having different stakes and expectations that need to be balanced.”
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As an enabler, interview respondents pointed at public procurement to spur market development of modular and upgradeable EV charging systems that allow for easier repair and scalability.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A multilevel organisational structure would be welcomed, as recurrently pointed out during project meetings, combining a locally embedded organisation with a larger cooperative network.”
hedged- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While decoupling voting rights from financial contributions may promote inclusivity, respondents highlight that community building and cohesion is more critical for long-term member engagement than having a formal vote.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firstly, EMS can optimise energy consumption by monitoring and controlling energy use in real time and adjusting energy demand in response to supply conditions.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, respondents emphasise that membership should provide tangible benefits, such as access to green energy, financial stability, or returns on investment, while accounting for spe cific needs and interests of different groups, such as homeowners, social housing residents, and commercial entities, to foster inclusive partici pation and ownership.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Energy management systems (EMS) enable smart grids to steer energy consumption etc., fostering circular outcomes.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most interview respondents support open and voluntary membership for its inclusivity and community engagement, emphasizing the need for clear obligations and tangible benefits.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A recurring item during project meetings and interviews was that technical expertise is crucial for managing the smart grid, which cannot be expected from the members themselves, necessitating skilled professionals throughout the lifecycle of the grid.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We once again identify incomplete markets, which are increasingly devel oping into maturity along the pace of the proliferation of EV.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interview respondents stress the importance of collaboration among cooperatives to achieve economies of scale, reducing overhead costs, and acquiring access to technical, financial, and legal skills and knowledge.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Respondents highlight the importance of incorporating CE principles and total cost of ownership (TCO) into cooperative operations, fostering sustainable practices and proactive maintenance alongside financial incentives for members.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirdly, embedding CE goals in the cooperative ' s statutes and operational procedures (e.g., on procurement and maintenance) is deemed vital to prevent mission drift, as future members may consider circularity goals less relevant in the short term.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Markets for DC-DC inverters are mostly under development, resulting in high prices and a suboptimal pace of technological development.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Respondents stress the importance of embedding CE and social goals in governance, while leveraging economies of scale to safeguard mission alignment and ensuring clear authority over CAPEX and OPEX decisions.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most pressing uncertainty of the entire project, however, boils down to the question to what extent EV chargers will be utilised, which is linked to the uptake of electrical vehicles in general, as well as the use of the parking on the Transfo site in particular.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This conflicts, however, with the viewpoint of some interview respondents who claim that energy co operatives should be based on citizen-membership alone, precluding multistakeholder models.”
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results identify market failures and how they could be resolved by means of cooperative stakeholder collaboration, such as reducing intertemporal externalities, split incentives, agency problems, and behavioural externalities of members.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, EMS can extend the life cycle of equipment by ensuring they operate within optimal parameters and predicting when maintenance is required.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interview respondents often point out they would like the smart grid to provide access to low-income households at beneficial conditions.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transparent communication and regular meetings with these stakeholders have been identified as essential to maintain trust and accountability.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the scope of the smart grid is currently limited to EV charging, even there, flexible and smart charging business models are, according to the supplier, less likely to be adopted compared to (higher) charging high-speed tariffs that do not take energy production into ac count.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While EMS systems may enable peak shaving and demand control, suppliers and energy experts point out that only a few customers will be willing to adapt their behaviour accordingly as long as real-time pricing and dynamic tariffs are not or incompletely implemented.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to interview respondents, their proliferation mostly depends on the uptake of DC grids.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings suggest that cooperative governance can mitigate market failures involved, such as split incentives and asymmetric information, resolving missing markets and facilitating the integration of CE strategies in smart grids.”
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“During the last 180 years, cooperatives have been proven to be an organisational form that is able to tackle societal problems while strengthening resilience of its members and their communities [15,16].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] [15] ILO, Promotion of cooperatives recommendation. Recommendation 193., (2002). -
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [16] [16] S. Novkovic, Cooperative identity as a yardstick for transformative change, Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 93 (2022) 313 -336, https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12362. - source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As the number of realised smart grid projects remains low, scholars increasingly document the institutional failures of both for-profit and public sector solutions [23].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] [23] A.-R. Kojonsaari, J. Palm, The development of social science research on smart grids: a semi-structured literature review, Energy Sustain. Soc. 13 (2023) 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00381-9. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analysing design-implementation gaps and boundary conditions for scaling and replication highlights the importance of overcoming regulatory barriers and engaging stakeholders through compelling value propositions.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Market failures increase the costs of market contracting and can result in missing or incomplete markets.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally , inter nalising externalities in product taxes on new energy generation systems would help to render their business case positive.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These studies propose using a DC backbone as an alternative to alternative current (AC) backbones in smart grids by connecting various DC-based renewable energy generation systems, storage systems [39], and loads such as EV chargers [40,41].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] [39] H. Azaioud, R. Claeys, J. Knockaert, L. Vandevelde, J. Desmet, A low-voltage DC backbone with aggregated RES and BESS: benefits compared to a traditional lowvoltage AC system, Energies 14 (2021) 1420, https://doi.org/10.3390/ en14051420. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [40] [40] H. Azaioud, A. Farnam, J. Knockaert, L. Vandevelde, J. Desmet, Efficiency optimisation and converterless PV integration by applying a dynamic voltage on an LVDC backbone, Appl. Energy 356 (2024) 122416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2023.122416. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [41] [41] R. Cleenwerck, H. Azaioud, M. Vafaeipour, T. Coosemans, J. Desmet, Impact assessment of electric vehicle charging in an AC and DC microgrid: a comparative study, Energies 16 (2023) 3205, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073205. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In the United States, cooperatives have been active for over 70 years to electrify rural parts of the country [64,65].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] [64] W. Gilcrease, V. DiCosmo, D. Padovan, Trends of rural electric cooperatives in the United States from 1990 to 2019: an empirical analysis, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 166 (2022) 112641, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112641. - source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] [65] M. Grimley, G. Chan, ' Cooperative is an oxymoron! ' : a polycentric energy transition perspective on distributed energy deployment in the upper Midwestern United States, Energy Policy 172 (2023) 113328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2022.113328. - source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Martin et al. [63] examine platform cooperatives that combine users and service providers for smart city development.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] [63] C.J. Martin, J. Evans, A. Karvonen, Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 133 (2018) 269 -278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2018.01.005. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“Recently, Hu et al. [35] established PV reuse as the preferred strategy to mitigate carbon emissions for the four major metals in solar PV (i.e., aluminium, copper, nickel, and lead).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] [35] X. Hu, A. Elshkaki, L. Shen, The implications of circular economy strategies on the future energy transition technologies and their impacts: solar PV as a case study, Energy 313 (2024) 133972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133972. - source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth , mandatory requirements to engage in a modular design that facilitates repair and upgrading of these systems would reduce intertemporal externalities.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cooperative smart grid governance has been studied to address collective action challenges in their design and implementation.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To align this with preferences, behaviours, and identities of prospective users and communities, it is important to acknowledge that governing a smart grid is above all a socio-technical challenge [23].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] [23] A.-R. Kojonsaari, J. Palm, The development of social science research on smart grids: a semi-structured literature review, Energy Sustain. Soc. 13 (2023) 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00381-9. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not checked yet
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Smart grids may enhance community resilience by reducing the risk of power outages, ensuring community access to renewable energy, or developing services for marginalised groups and civil society organisations [25,26].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] [25] C. Hotaling, S. Bird, M.D. Heintzelman, Willingness to pay for microgrids to enhance community resilience, Energy Policy 154 (2021) 112248, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112248. - source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] [26] E. Tarasova, H. Rohracher, Marginalising household users in smart grids, Technol. Soc. 72 (2023) 102185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techsoc.2022.102185. - source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They have a long tradition of mobilizing people and resources to establish common goals, and are often regarded as an inclusive governance mechanism for energy projects as they allow citizens direct participation in decision-making [63].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] [63] C.J. Martin, J. Evans, A. Karvonen, Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 133 (2018) 269 -278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2018.01.005. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Smart grid development may be shaped by regional institutional contexts but the insights on cooperatives derived from this study have a broad international relevance given the globally applied and comparable framework employed.”
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the heritage site has multiple public good characteristics, as its societal value exceeds the private value of the site owners which may cause split incentives and positive externalities.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Important governance aspects involved in designing, implementing, and operating a smart grid include ownership, decision-making processes, and the relationship between funders, installers, owners, users, and the host community.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This subsequently causes an absence of proven business models, which in turn leads to a near-absent demand from market players, leaving DC grids invisible for most policy makers and confirming the regulatory lock-in of the mainstream AC-solution.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ziegler et al. [19] presented a study on the potential contribution of cooperatives to the CE, showing their potential to anchor circularity in the hearth of the cooperative model.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] [19] R. Ziegler, C. Poirier, M. Lacasse, E. Murray, Circular economy and cooperatives -an exploratory survey, Sustainability 15 (2023) 2530, https://doi. org/10.3390/su15032530. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These strategies will not eliminate the waste problem nor the demand for virgin critical raw materials, but by supporting lifetime extension and resource efficient design, they can significantly mitigate it, contributing to the slowing and narrowing of material loops.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirdly , market development would also benefit from the establishment of infrastructure and support systems for the collection, testing, and refurbishment of used energy generation systems and components.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This would also serve the cause of keeping materials within Europe, addressing human rights issues related to raw material extraction, and promoting circular ecosystems in general.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a study on a campus smart grid, no less than 74 KPIs in 15 service areas were listed [51].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] [51] S. Alrashed, Key performance indicators for smart campus and microgrid, Sustain. Cities Soc. 60 (2020) 102264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102264. - source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given the documented importance to involve users in smart grid design and operations [59,60], including their willingness to engage in energy management systems and demand response [61], we focus on the potential role of hybrid organisations, such as cooperatives, in smart grid governance.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] [59] D. Geelen, A. Reinders, D. Keyson, Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services, Energy Policy 61 (2013) 151 -161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.107. - source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] [60] W. Throndsen, What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid, Energy Effic. 10 (2017) 283 -297, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9456-5. - source
- Not checked yetcites [61] [61] [B.K. Sovacool, P. Kivimaa, S. Hielscher, K. Jenkins, Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom ' s smart meter transition, Energy Policy 109 (2017) 767 -781.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2214-6296(25)00130-6/rf0290) - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While cooperatives are a promising model for advancing sustainable energy transitions, they require regulatory support and community involvement to realise their full potential.”
plainconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Markets may be missing as well because they have public goods characteristics, encompassing the challenge to resolve collective action problems [57,99].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] [57] [E. Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2214-6296(25)00130-6/rf0270) -
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] [99] S. Patala, L. Albareda, M. Halme, Polycentric governance of privately owned resources in circular economy systems, J. Manag. Stud. 59 (2022) 1563 -1596, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12810. - source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, they suffer from a lack of awareness and acceptance among the general public [69,70] or unfavourable institutional conditions to operate in the energy market, leading to an unequal geographical distribution of REScoops in Europe [71,72].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [69] [69] B. Fischer, G. Gutsche, H. Wetzel, Who wants to get involved? Determining citizen willingness to participate in German renewable energy cooperatives, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 76 (2021) 102013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. erss.2021.102013. - source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] [70] [M. Tarhan, Renewable energy cooperatives: a review of demonstrated impacts and limitations, J. Entrep. Organ. Divers. 4 (2015) 104 -120.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2214-6296(25)00130-6/rf0335) - source
- Not checked yetcites [71] [71] C. Candelise, G. Ruggieri, Status and evolution of the community energy sector in Italy, Energies 13 (2020) 1888, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081888. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [72] [72] I. Capell ´ an-P ´ erez, ´ A. Campos-Celador, J. Ter ´ es-Zubiaga, Renewable energy cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain, Energy Policy 123 (2018) 215 -229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.064. -
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, most of these projects remain small in size and scope.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This strategy rethinks the smart grid set up and contributes to slowing loops by reducing energy conversion losses and extending equipment lifespan [42].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [42] [42] H. Azaioud, R. Claeys, J. Knockaert, L. Vandevelde, J. Desmet, Self-sufficiency and lifetime improvement of community BESS on an LVDC backbone compared to individual BESS, 2023, pp. 2099 -2103, https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2023.1184. - source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cooperatives are distinct from for-profit organisational forms as their members are both owners and beneficiaries (or users) of the cooperative, and participate in the decision-making in a democratic way [62].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] [62] E.M. Limnios, T. Mazzarol, G.N. Soutar, K.H. Siddique, The member wears four hats: a member identification framework for co-operative enterprises, J. Co-Op. Organ. Manag. 6 (2018) 20 -33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2018.03.003. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This helps to build a knowledge base and reduce costs and risks of subsequent projects, triggering dynamic economies of scale and contributing to the market development of DC grids.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies on higher-level circular strategies are mostly found at the component level.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Regarding renewable energy generation, Rabaia [31] presents an overview of 10 circular strategies for solar PV, including strategies to extend the lifespan of PV panels, such as reusing discarded models, improved maintenance, and refurbishment of older PV modules.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] [31] M.K.H. Rabaia, N. Shehata, V. Olabi, M.A. Abdelkareem, C. Semeraro, K.-J. Chae, E.T. Sayed, Enabling the circular economy of solar PV through the 10Rs of sustainability: critical review, conceptualization, barriers, and role in achieving SDGs, Sustain. Horiz. 11 (2024) 100106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. horiz.2024.100106. - source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Cooperatives, rely on a set of organisational governance principles (see Table 1) that define the cooperative difference compared to other organisational forms [17].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] [17] ICA, International Cooperative Alliance Statement of the co-operative identity., (1995). -
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Research on the social aspects of smart grids has been identified to be lagging to knowledge development of its technical aspects, resulting in major research gaps on energy democracy [23,27].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] [23] A.-R. Kojonsaari, J. Palm, The development of social science research on smart grids: a semi-structured literature review, Energy Sustain. Soc. 13 (2023) 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00381-9. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [27] [27] M. Wolsink, Conceptualizations of smart grids -anomalous and contradictory expert paradigms in transitions of the electricity system, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 109 (2024) 103392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103392. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This, however, requires the smart grid to be financially viable in the first place.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Never theless, a limited supply of DC chargers will eventually lead to relatively high prices and a suboptimal pace of technological development and integration.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This calls for supporting the development of second-tier cooperative networks can further enhance resource sharing, governance efficiency, and the ability to scale innovative solutions across regions [126].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [126] [126] M. Boucher, M.-A. Pigeon, Scaling renewable energy cooperatives for a net-zero Canada: challenges and opportunities for accelerating the energy transition, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 115 (2024) 103618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. erss.2024.103618. - source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the smart grid encompasses a potential to create value for households in energy poverty or lacking financial, technical, or legal access to renewables on their own roof.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It would also enable scale-out and scale-deep strategies (versus scale-up strategies) focused on broadening the diversity of services offered to the same target audience and improving processes to enhance the impact on beneficiaries, respectively, which have been identified as suitable scaling strategies for general interest cooperatives such as REScoops [125].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] [125] T. Bauwens, B. Huybrechts, F. Dufays, Understanding the diverse scaling strategies of social enterprises as hybrid organizations: the case of renewable energy cooperatives, Organ. Environ. 33 (2020) 195 -219, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1086026619837126. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This technique, originating from behavioural economics [111,112], helps to mitigate cognitive biases among interview respondents such as confirmation bias, hind sight bias, and groupthink.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] [111] D. Gallop, C. Willy, J. Bischoff, How to catch a black swan: measuring the benefits of the premortem technique for risk identification, J. Enterp. Transform. 6 (2016) 87 -106, https://doi.org/10.1080/19488289.2016.1240118. - source
- Not checked yetcites [112] [112] [H.R. Thaler, R.C. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, Yale University Press, New Haven & London, 2008.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2214-6296(25)00130-6/rf0535) -
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Important to mention is the international scope and experience of multiple service suppliers, energy consultants, research institutes, and citizen energy cooperatives we interviewed, allowing us to safeguard the broader geographical appli cability of our results.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This way, cooperatives can partially internalise the positive externality of education if they apply an open membership model.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“although the conceptual framework of the ICA principles has demonstrated its applicability and value in studying cooperative governance [16,18]”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [16] [16] S. Novkovic, Cooperative identity as a yardstick for transformative change, Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 93 (2022) 313 -336, https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12362. - source
- Not checked yetcites [18] [18] B. Huybrechts, S. Mertens, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 85 (2014) 193 -212, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/apce.12038. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“EMS can thus reduce the need for additional energy production and reduce the overall grid dimension.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the global relevance of the ICA framework, this framework can be easily applied to most other industrialised countries and regions.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This would also enhance the agility and resilience of these cooperatives to adapt to evolving subsidy schemes, economic conditions, and technological developments, as called for by [124].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] [124] C. Nolden, J. Barnes, J. Nicholls, Community energy business model evolution: a review of solar photovoltaic developments in England, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 122 (2020) 109722, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109722. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Again, economies of scale are a crucial enabler for cooperatives to mitigate or resolve market failures.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, for the Transfo site, revising energy-sharing regulations, such as the Flemish decree on energy communities, is a critical first step to incentivise shared energy use and cooperative ownership models.”
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Table A.1 we report an overview of the 33 anonymized interview respondents that have been interviewed during 30 online MS Teams interviews after providing formal informed consent.”
plainn = 33- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of the Transfo smart grid, its founding partners (the municipality, the prov ince, and the intermunicipal organisation) could be considered a natural founding members of the cooperative.”
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, regulatory barriers resulted in a lacking viable business case, causing failure on achieving the 3rd and 4th ICA principle, which in turn rendered the first two principles redundant.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Literature on principal agent problems within cooperatives pointed out earlier that a heterogeneous membership may spur freeriding in this regard [18,73,88].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] [18] B. Huybrechts, S. Mertens, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 85 (2014) 193 -212, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/apce.12038. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [73] [73] T. Bauwens, Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy, Energy Policy 93 (2016) 278 -290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2016.03.017. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [88] [88] S. Novkovic, Defining the co-operative difference, J. Socio-Econ. 37 (2008) 2168 -2177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.02.009. - source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Likewise, legislation that encourages the standardisation of smart technologies and their integration into the grid can facilitate a broader adoption.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“may distort value as failing to fully account the worth of materials, resources, products, and labour within market prices.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] [79] T. Siderius, T. Zink, Markets and the future of the circular economy, Circ. Econ. Sustain. 3 (2023) 1569 -1595, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00196-4. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While a cooperative may offer dividends or reduced energy costs for members, also non-financial returns such as a sense of ownership and pride among members may be crucial to increase the social acceptance of its activities.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As outlined from the start of the smart grid project and repeated by many interview respondents, a circular smart grid requires technical expertise, ongoing education, and outreach to ensure that cooperative members understand smart grid management and the mission of the cooperative.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, cooperative membership may be open, but does not have to be without obligation.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While our focus on a single case study that lasted for more than 4 years allows to capture many project and process dynamics”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that project partners are also project beneficiaries, while respondents indicated as project beneficiary were not formally involved in the UIA project as described in Section 3.2.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These TCO concerns may help to internalise intertemporal externalities and engenders a smart grid governance that fosters proactive maintenance and repair.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, open and voluntary membership could enhance cooperation to internalise externalities between members.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Limitations of this work include that is based on a single case study”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This enhances the longevity of the equipment and decreases the need for frequent replacements.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A revision of this decree would create multiple ways to scale the smart grid towards a broader set of users and applications.”
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To enhance reliability, we documented interview procedures, meeting notes, and project deliverables, ensuring traceability and replicability.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both transmission and distribution system operators (TSO and DSO) would benefit from collaborations in grid innovation projects to pilot innovative technologies.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, the premortem analysis used in interviews encouraged respondents to critically reflect on assumptions, mitigating cognitive biases and enriching robustness of our data.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As an alternative to markets and hierarchies, cooperatives are subject to particular organisational constraints [68], which have been defined in the ICA statement on cooperative identity [17].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] [68] ¨ O. Yildiz, J. Rommel, S. Debor, L. Holstenkamp, F. Mey, J.R. Müller, J. Radtke, J. Rognli, Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda, energy res, Soc. Sci. 6 (2015) 59 -73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001. - source
- Not checked yetcites [17] [17] ICA, International Cooperative Alliance Statement of the co-operative identity., (1995). -
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The regulatory context of Belgium, in this case, consists of a rich and multi-layered institutional ecosystem with multiple comple mentary actors that sometimes fail to develop, implement, and retain consistent and coherent energy policies [118].”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [118] [118] W. Van Opstal, S. Manshoven, From trust to transition: residential customer acceptance of circular solar business models, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 115 (2024) 103647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103647. - source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A similar approach has been conducted in other research on sociotechnical aspects of smart grid in novations [91,110].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] [91] I. Lammers, M.A. Heldeweg, Smart design rules for smart grids: analysing local smart grid development through an empirico-legal institutional lens, Energy Sustain. Soc. 6 (2016) 36, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0102-z. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] [110] N. Verkade, J. H ¨ offken, The design and development of domestic smart grid interventions: insights from the Netherlands, J. Clean. Prod. 202 (2018) 799 -805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.185. - source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To ensure the validity of our research, we employed a combination of methodological, source, and theoretical triangulation [113,114].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] [113] B.K. Sovacool, J. Axsen, S. Sorrell, Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design, energy res, Soc. Sci. 45 (2018) 12 -42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. erss.2018.07.007. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] [114] E. Bell, A. Bryman, B. Harley, Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, 2022. - source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An important lesson from the Transfo project is the need for joint innovation projects by cooperatives and their regulating energy ecosystem to identify specific regulatory barriers and challenges while developing value propositions in close connection with the communities they aim to serve.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the inclusion of a CHP in the smart grid could leave room for future optimisation.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such membership obligations, however, can only be as strict as members are willing to commit to.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While cooperative smart grid governance may involve diverse stakeholders, it remains crucial to embed CE goals in the statutes to prevent mission drift while maintaining member engagement.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In case of failure, however, the entire business model of the smart grid will go down.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This broad set of respondents allowed for data triangulation, comparing and cross-verifying evidence from different angles.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Reflections on the project highlight the missed opportunity of involving the DSO and a regional REScoop from the outset, which could have enhanced stakeholder participation and the overall success of the project [106].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] [106] Leiedal, A Ccobbled Rroad to an Eelectrifying Ffuture, Leiedal, 2024. -
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simplifying these frameworks can encourage broader participation and create viable pathways for cooperatives to expand their activities.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Table B.1 we report an overview of project documents related to the case study involving the participation of the first author. Meeting notes and materials include PowerPoint presentations, agenda ' s, technical documents, and attachments discussed during these meetings.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As smart grids are sociotechnical and incremental grids”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] [23] A.-R. Kojonsaari, J. Palm, The development of social science research on smart grids: a semi-structured literature review, Energy Sustain. Soc. 13 (2023) 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00381-9. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [117] [117] A. Kumar, Beyond technical smartness: rethinking the development and implementation of sociotechnical smart grids in India, energy res, Soc. Sci. 49 (2019) 158 -168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.026. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This aligns with findings from studies on energy communities [115] and renewable energy cooperatives [74].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] [115] I. D ' Adamo, M. Gastaldi, S.C.L. Koh, A. Vigiano, Lighting the future of sustainable cities with energy communities: an economic analysis for incentive policy, Cities 147 (2024) 104828, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104828. - source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] [74] E. Flei ß , S. Hatzl, S. Seebauer, A. Posch, Money, not morale: the impact of desires and beliefs on private investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives, J. Clean. Prod. 141 (2017) 920 -927, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2016.09.123. - source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
The paper relies on this without support.
No research has been published earlier on governance aspects of circular economy strategies in smart grids.
“Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no research has been published earlier on governance aspects of CE strategies in smart grids.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The circular economy and society transitions require participation of all members of society.
“The circular economy and society transitions require participation of all members of society, enhancing resilience of both communities and businesses.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Transfo site is a unique and highly pertinent example for studying circular smart grids.
“Given the explicit circularity ambitions embedded in this case from its inception, we regard it as a unique and highly pertinent example for our study [53,106].”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inverters can be designed more resource-efficiently in a DC-grid due to reduced energy losses (DC-DC instead of DC-AC-DC).
“A third crucial component of physical network is the inverters , which can be designed more resource-efficiently in a DC-grid due to reduced energy losses (DC-DC instead of DC-AC-DC).”
The paper relies on this without support.
REScoops struggle to break out of their niches, largely due to their reliance on volunteers for management and operations.
“This is important, as REScoops struggle to break out of their niches, largely due to their reliance on volunteers for management and operations.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The market can align with a circular transition.
“the assumption that market can align with a circular transition”
The paper relies on this without support.
The practical implementation of ICA principles often falls short of its idealtypical representation.
“its practical implementation often falls short of its idealtypical representation.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Education, training, and information · p. 10
“Another respondent, working at the munici pality states this as follows: ' We want to explain what we do on the site and how it is implemented to other departments and applications within our organisation, and we and our colleagues learn also useful lessons we can apply in our own homes ' [nr. 23b].”
§ Acknowledgements · p. 15
“| 23b | Board member | RESCOOP | External expert | March 26, 2024 |”
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness
Adkisson, R. V. (2008) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2008.09.003 · Cited by 5,706
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Self-citationGoverning the commons — the evolution of institutions for collective action
Weede, E. (1992) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(92)90034-e · Cited by 3,942
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475
In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., & McElreath, R. L. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.73 · Cited by 2,619
BUSINESS RESEARCH METHODS (PHƯƠNG PHÁP NGHIÊN CỨU TRONG KINH DOANH)Preprint
Le, H. V., & T., A. T. T. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4488860 · Cited by 2,564
Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & de Ven, A. H. V. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001 · Cited by 2,548
Social Capital and Community Governance
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. M. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00077 · Cited by 1,548
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- European Commission, Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023: Final Report., Publications Office, LU, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2873/725585 (accessed June 22, 2023). · DOI
- Girard, 2017, CIRCULAR ECONOMY AND CULTURAL HERITAGE/LANDSCAPE REGENERATION. CIRCULAR BUSINESS, FINANCING AND GOVERNANCE MODELS FOR a COMPETITIVE EUROPE, BDC boll, Cent. Calza Bini, 17, 35
- Engels, 2015, The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition, energy res, Soc. Sci., 9, 35
- Throndsen, 2017, What do experts talk about when they talk about users?, Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid, Energy Effic., 10, 283
- Holstenkamp, 2016, What are community energy companies trying to accomplish?, An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case, Energy Policy, 97, 112
- Braz, 2022, Circular economy supply network management: a complex adaptive system, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 243, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108317 · DOI
- Hansmann, 1999, Cooperative firms in theory and practice, LTA, 48, 387
- C. Robson, Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK ; Madden, Mass, 2002.
- Sovacool, 2018, Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design, energy res, Soc. Sci., 45, 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biodiesel: A comprehensive review of properties, catalyst types, and feedstock sources
Shanthini, V. S., Chitra, D., & Moorthy, G. (2025) · Results in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102678 · Cited by 57
Wei, T., Li, H., & Miao, J. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13082428 · Cited by 34
Enabling and embedding circularity goals in housing cooperatives
Opstal, W. V., Bocken, N. M. P., & Brusselaers, J. (2025) · Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances · doi:10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200272 · Cited by 8
Self-citationThe cloud has wires: Toward circular governance of smart grids
Pardalis, G., Palm, J., & Reindl, K. (2026) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148238 · Cited by 5
Circular Economy and Energy Transition: Research Trends, Knowledge Structure, and Future Directions
Ng, S.-L., & Chen, C.-Y. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19030763 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Opstal, W., Bocken, N., & Brusselaers, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Venue
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 104049
- ISSN
- 2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409074235
- Semantic Scholar
- 00ac886a666ce28d7987734c6f88636d68506a8e
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable Energy and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Law › Energy Law and Policy
- Keywords
- cooperative governance, circular economy, renewable energy, smart grid, sustainable energy transition, market failure, split incentives, information asymmetry, missing markets, critical raw materials, waste, stakeholder engagement, regulatory challenges, community resilience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review