Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 913

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments

Barnard, Lucy, Lan, William Y., To, Yen M., Paton, Valerie Osland, Lai, Shu-Ling·2009·The Internet and Higher Education
DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Barnard, 2008, Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 1, 10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.516 · DOI
  2. Bowen, 1996, The relationship of locus of control and cognitive style to self-instructional strategies, sequencing, and outcomes in a learner-controlled multimedia environment, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 56, 3922
  3. Broad, 1999, The dynamics of quality assurance in online distance education, Electronic Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 3
  4. Carnevale, 2000, Turning traditional courses into distance education, Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, 37
  5. Chang, 2007, Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring, Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 23, 187, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.x · DOI
  6. Enders, 2001, The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kramarski, 2006, How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments?, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x · DOI
  8. Kramarski, 2006, Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy, The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 218, 10.3200/JOER.99.4.218-231 · DOI
  9. Lan, 1996, The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation, Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 101, 10.1080/00220973.1996.9943798 · DOI
  10. Lewis, 2000, Distance education at postsecondary education institutions, 1997–98, Education Statistics Quarterly, 2, 118
  11. Lynch, 2004, The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5, 1, 10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.189 · DOI · Paper page
  12. MacCallum, 1996, Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling, Psychological Methods, 1, 130, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
  13. McManus, 2000, Individualizing instruction in a Web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 219
  14. Orange, 1999, Using peer modeling to teach self-regulation, Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 21, 10.1080/00220979909598492 · DOI
  15. Roblyer, 1999, Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 157, 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782621 · DOI
  16. Schraw, 2007, The use of computer-based environments for understanding and improving self-regulation, Metacognition Learning, 2, 169, 10.1007/s11409-007-9015-8 · DOI
  17. Steffens, 2006, Self-regulated learning in technology-enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a European peer review, European Journal of Education, 41, 353, 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00271.x · DOI
  18. Tallent-Runnels, 2006, New models of learning: A review of research on the use of technology in online courses, Review of Educational Research, 76, 93, 10.3102/00346543076001093 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Zimmerman, 1998, Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective, Educational Psychologist, 33, 73, 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L.
Venue
The Internet and Higher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
OpenAlex
W2033726034
Cited by
913
References
4
FWCI
28.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.