Cited by 560Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 314 of the 314 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physicochemical properties of mucus and their impact on transmucosal drug delivery

Open access
Leal, Jasmim, Smyth, Hugh D.C., Ghosh, Debadyuti·2017·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Mucus is a selective barrier to particles and molecules, preventing penetration to the epithelial surface of mucosal tissues. Significant advances in transmucosal drug delivery have recently been made and have emphasized that an understanding of the basic structure, viscoelastic properties, and interactions of mucus is of great value in the design of efficient drug delivery systems. Mucins, the primary non-aqueous component of mucus, are polymers carrying a complex and heterogeneous structure with domains that undergo a variety of molecular interactions, such as hydrophilic/hydrophobic, hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. These properties are directly relevant to the numerous mucin-associated diseases, as well as delivering drugs across the mucus barrier. Therefore, in this review we discuss regional differences in mucus composition, mucus physicochemical properties, such as pore size, viscoelasticity, pH, and ionic strength. These factors are also discussed with respect to changes in mucus properties as a function of disease state. Collectively, the review seeks to provide a state of the art roadmap for researchers who must contend with this critical barrier to drug delivery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.018

Cites

314 of 314 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Leal, J., Smyth, H. D. C., & Ghosh, D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Ghosh, Debadyuti
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
532
Issue
1
Pages
555-572
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754709330
Cited by
560
References
314
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL138251)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
mucus, mucosal drug delivery, mucin, mucus barrier, viscoelasticity, pore size, pH, ionic strength, mucosal epithelium, drug delivery systems
MeSH terms
Humans, Mucins, Mucus, Viscosity, Drug Delivery Systems, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review