Cited by 285Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Changes in Fitness and Fatness on the Development of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors

Open access
Lee, Duck-chul, Sui, Xuemei, Church, Timothy S., Lavie, Carl J., Jackson, Andrew S., Blair, Steven N.·2012·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study sought examine the independent and combined associations of changes in fitness and fatness with the subsequent incidence of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors of hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia.Background The relative and combined contributions of fitness and fatness to health are controversial, and few studies are available on the associations of changes in fitness and fatness with the development of CVD risk factors.Methods We followed up 3,148 healthy adults who received at least 3 medical examinations. Fitness was determined by using a maximal treadmill test. Fatness was expressed by percent body fat and body mass index. Changes in fitness and fatness between the first and second examinations were categorized into loss, stable, or gain groups.Results During the 6-year follow-up after the second examination, 752, 426, and 597 adults developed hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia, respectively. Maintaining or improving fitness was associated with lower risk of developing each outcome, whereas increasing fatness was associated with higher risk of developing each outcome, after adjusting for possible confounders and fatness or fitness for each other (all p for trend <0.05). In the joint analyses, the increased risks associated with fat gain appeared to be attenuated, although not completely eliminated, when fitness was maintained or improved. In addition, the increased risks associated with fitness loss were also somewhat attenuated when fatness was reduced.Conclusions Both maintaining or improving fitness and preventing fat gain are important to reduce the risk of developing CVD risk factors in healthy adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.013

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Every −1% body fat reduction is associated with −3%, −4%, and −8% lower risks of developing CVD risk factors of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and metabolic syndrome, respectively, in the authors' early study.

    “every −1% body fat reduction is associated with −3%, −4%, and −8% lower risks of developing CVD risk factors of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and metabolic syndrome, respectively, in our early study.42”

    From Aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training and cardiovascular risk profile in overweight or obese adults: the CardioRACE trial (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results report that each unit increase in percent body fat was associated with 4%, 5%, and 10% higher risks of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and metabolic syndrome, respectively. This supports the direction of the claimed association, but the paper does not report the stated 3%, 4%, and 8% risk reductions for a one-unit decrease; reversing an increase does not yield the same percentages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, D.-C., Sui, X., Church, T. S., Lavie, C. J., Jackson, A. S., & Blair, S. N.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Ochsner Health System (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Duck-chul
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
59
Issue
7
Pages
665-672
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W105412638
Cited by
285
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 13
FWCI
21.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG06945, HL62508, DK088195)
  • The Coca-Cola Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
cardiovascular risk factors, physical fitness, adiposity, fat gain, fitness loss, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolemia, body mass index, body fat percentage, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review