Cited by 119Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

On the measurement of rumination: a psychometric evaluation of the ruminative response scale and the rumination on sadness scale in undergraduates

Open access
Roelofs, Jeffrey, Muris, Peter, Huibers, Marcus, Peeters, Frenk, Arntz, Arnoud·2006·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Rumination is considered a specific cognitive vulnerability factor that is thought to play a prominent role in the maintenance of depressive symptoms. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of two measures of rumination, the ruminative response scale (RRS) and the rumination on sadness scale (RSS) in undergraduates (N=331). A joint factor analysis yielded three factors, 'rumination on causes of sadness', 'symptom-based rumination', and 'rumination on sadness'. The internal consistency of the rumination factors was good and the test-retest stability over a 6-month period of time was moderate. Support was also found for the construct validity of the rumination factors. Finally, the 'rumination on the causes of sadness' factor was found to moderate the relation between depression measured at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. More specifically, baseline depression was a strong predictor of future depression but this was particularly true for high ruminating individuals. Implications of the results and directions for future research are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.03.002

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RRS has good psychometric properties including internal consistency (α = 0.72-0.79) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.60-0.62).

    “The measure has good psychometric properties including internal consistency (α = 0.72–0.79) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.60–0.62) (Roelofs et al., 2006; Treynor et al., 2003).”

    From Online mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression: Outcomes of a pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Roelofs et al., 2006

    The Introduction reports exactly these coefficients for the reflection and brooding subscales of a revised measure made from RRS items, citing Treynor et al. (2003). It does not give those ranges for the RRS as a whole; this paper’s own reliability results in §3.2 report different six-month test–retest values for its retained factors. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roelofs, J., Muris, P., Huibers, M., Peeters, F., & Arntz, A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Roelofs, Jeffrey
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
299-313
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106815108
Cited by
119
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
rumination, Ruminative Response Scale, psychometric properties, cognitive vulnerability, depression maintenance, depressive symptoms, undergraduate students, test-retest stability, construct validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Animals, Anxiety, Attention, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Spiders, Students, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review