Cited by 53Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Associations between depression, anxious arousal and manifestations of psychological inflexibility

Open access
Gilbert, Kirsten E., Tonge, Natasha A., Thompson, Renee J.·2019·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Psychological inflexibility exhibits across multiple facets of functioning, including thinking styles, personality, cognitive shifting, emotion, and physiology, with many of these manifestations showing associations with depression. As such, these facets might be part of an overarching latent construct of psychological inflexibility that explains associations with depression. We predicted that (1) five facets of inflexibility (perseverative thinking, personality rigidity, attention-shifting, negative emotional inertia, and low respiratory sinus arrhythmia reactivity) would load onto a unique latent construct of psychological inflexibility. Further, we hypothesized this latent construct of psychological inflexibility would be (2) significantly associated with higher depression; and (3) associated with depression to a greater extent than anxious arousal.Methods Seventy-five adult community participants completed measures assessing the five indices of inflexibility and self-report measures of depression and anxious arousal.Results Structural equation modeling identified a latent inflexibility construct reflected by perseverative thinking, personality rigidity, and emotional inertia, but did not include attention-shifting or RSA reactivity. The inflexibility construct was positively associated with depression and anxious arousal, but more strongly associated with depression than with anxious arousal.Limitations Limitations included a small sample size, cross-sectional approach, and dimensional measures of depression and anxious arousal.Conclusions Findings provide preliminary support that multiple facets of inflexibility may emerge from a broader overarching vulnerability for internalizing psychopathology. This overarching inflexibility construct may have stronger associations with depression than with anxious arousal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.09.006

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological inflexibility is closely related to a variety of mental disorders, including depression, anxiety and somatization, eating disorders, substance use, psychosis, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

    “Psychological inflexibility is closely related to a variety of mental disorders, including depression (Gilbert et al., 2019), anxiety and somatization (Tavakoli et al., 2019; Venta et al., 2012), eating disorders (Fairburn et al., 2003; Rawal et al., 2010), substance use (Levin et al., 2012), psychosis (Goldstone et al., 2011), and posttraumatic stress disorder (Meyer et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, & Wilson KG (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Lynch TR (2018). Radically Open Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Theory and Practice for Treating Disorders of Overcontrol Oakland, CA: Context Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, K. E., Tonge, N. A., & Thompson, R. J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Renee J.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
62
Pages
88-96
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892015407
Cited by
53
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (T32 MH100019-03, K23MH115074-01)
  • Washington University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
psychological inflexibility, depression, anxious arousal, perseverative thinking, personality rigidity, attentional shift, latent constructs, internalizing psychopathology, cognitive flexibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Arousal, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Thinking, Young Adult, Executive Function, Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review