Cited by 273Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

A mass estimate of perfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) release from Australian wastewater treatment plants

Gallen, C., Eaglesham, G., Drage, D., Nguyen, T. Hue, Mueller, J.F.·2018·Chemosphere

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been used in large quantities for a variety of applications in Australian industry and household products. Through the course of their everyday use, PFASs enter the wastewater stream however current treatment processes provide only partial removal of these chemicals from wastewater. The release of treated effluent and re-use of biosolids represents an important point source of PFASs into the Australian environment yet the scale of PFAS release from Australian WWTPs is unknown. For the first time, influent, effluent and biosolids samples from 14 WWTPs across Australia were assessed for 9 PFASs and the national loads of these PFASs released from WWTPs estimated. Ʃ9PFASs ranged from 0.98 to 440 ng/L (influent), 21-560 ng/L (effluent) and 5.2-150 ng/g (biosolids). National loads of PFOA and PFOS in effluent were estimated at 65 kg and 26 kg per annum respectively. In biosolids, annual loads were estimated at 2 kg and 8 kg respectively. The continued detection of PFOS over a decade after its phase out, the increasing use of PFOS alternatives together with their resistance to degradation processes suggests that PFASs will be a priority for regulators and waste management to prevent further contamination of Australia's water resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.024

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallen, C., Eaglesham, G., Drage, D., Nguyen, T. H., & Mueller, J. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Gallen, C.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
208
Pages
975-983
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807088657
Cited by
273
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queensland Department of Health
  • Australian Government Department of the Environment
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFAS, wastewater treatment plants, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, biosolids, treated effluent, PFAS alternatives, water pollution, Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Waste Management, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review