Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Customer engagement and online reviews

Thakur, Rakhi·2018·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Anaza, 2013, Encounter-based antecedents of e-customer citizenship behaviors, J. Serv. Mark., 27, 130, 10.1108/08876041311309252 · DOI
  2. Arndt, 1967, Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product, J. Mark. Res., 291, 10.2307/3149462 · DOI
  3. Basuroy, 2003, How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets, J. Mark., 67, 103, 10.1509/jmkg.67.4.103.18692 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bendapudi, 1996, Enhancing helping behavior: an integrative framework for promotion planning, J. Mark., 60, 33, 10.2307/1251840 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bickart, 2001, Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information, J. Interact. Mark., 15, 31, 10.1002/dir.1014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bowden, 2009, Customer engagement: a framework for assessing customer-brand relationships: the case of the restaurant industry, J. Hosp. Mark. Manag., 18, 574
  7. Brockman, 1998, The influence of affective state on satisfaction ratings, J. Consum. Satisf., Dissatisf-. Complain. Behav., 11, 40
  8. Brodie, 2011, Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research, J. Serv. Res., 14, 252, 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI
  9. Brodie, 2011, Customer engagement, J. Serv. Res., 14, 252, 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI
  10. Brodie, 2013, Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: an exploratory analysis, J. Bus. Res., 66, 105, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brown, 2005, Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers' positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 33, 123, 10.1177/0092070304268417 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bughin, 2010, A new way to measure word-of-mouth marketing, McKinsey Q., 2, 113
  13. Byrne, 2004, Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: a road less traveled, Struct. Equ. Model., 11, 272, 10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Calder, 2009, An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness, J. Interact. Mark., 23, 321, 10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chen, 2012, When do third-party product reviews affect firm value and what can firms do? The case of media critics and professional movie reviews, J. Mark., 76, 116, 10.1509/jm.09.0034 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2008, Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix, Manag. Sci., 54, 477, 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810 · DOI
  17. Cheung, 2012, What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms, Decis. Support Syst., 53, 218, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  18. De Matos, 2008, Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 36, 578, 10.1007/s11747-008-0121-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dwivedi, 2015, A higher-order model of consumer brand engagement and its impact on loyalty intentions, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 24, 100, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Engel, 1969, How information is used to adopt an innovation, J. Mark. Res., 9, 3
  21. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Mark. Res., 18, 39, 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Godes, 2004, Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication, Mark. Sci., 23, 545, 10.1287/mksc.1040.0071 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gremler, 2001, Generating positive word-of-mouth communication through customer-employee relationships, Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag., 12, 44, 10.1108/09564230110382763 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Grewal, 2016, Mobile advertising: a framework and research agenda, J. Interact. Mark., 34, 3, 10.1016/j.intmar.2016.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gvili, 2016, Antecedents of attitudes toward eWOM communication: differences across channels, Internet Res., 26, 1030, 10.1108/IntR-08-2014-0201 · DOI
  26. Harris, 2004, The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics, J. Retail., 80, 139, 10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Harwood, 2015, An investigation into gamification as a customer engagement experience environment, J. Serv. Mark., 29, 533, 10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0045 · DOI
  28. Hollebeek, 2011, Demystifying customer brand engagement: exploring the loyalty nexus, J. Mark. Manag., 27, 785, 10.1080/0267257X.2010.500132 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Jaakkola, 2014, The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation: a service system perspective, J. Serv. Res., 17, 247, 10.1177/1094670514529187 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Janda, 2002, Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality, Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag., 13, 412, 10.1108/09564230210447913 · DOI
  31. Jarvis, 2003, A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research, J. Consum. Res., 30, 199, 10.1086/376806 · DOI
  32. Kim, 2009, The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process (Retrieved from), J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 16, 239, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kim, 2013, A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention, Decis. Support Syst., 56, 361, 10.1016/j.dss.2013.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kleijnen, 2007, An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness, J. Retail., 83, 33, 10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Labrecque, 2013, Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age, J. Interact. Mark., 27, 257, 10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lee, 2013, Effects of different types of free trials and ratings in sampling of consumer software: an empirical study, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 30, 213, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300308 · DOI
  37. Mathwick, 2016, Online reviewer engagement, J. Serv. Res.
  38. Maxham, 2002, A longitudinal study of complaining customers' evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts, J. Mark., 66, 57, 10.1509/jmkg.66.4.57.18512 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Mazzarol, 2007, Conceptualizing word-of-mouth activity, triggers and conditions: an exploratory study, Eur. J. Mark., 41, 1475, 10.1108/03090560710821260 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Mollen, 2010, Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives, J. Bus. Res., 63, 919, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Moorman, 1993, Factors affecting trust in market research relationships, J. Mark., 81, 10.2307/1252059 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Moorman, 1992, Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations, J. Mark. Res., 29, 314, 10.2307/3172742 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Mukherjee, 2003, A model of trust in online relationship banking, Int. J. Bank Mark., 21, 5, 10.1108/02652320310457767 · DOI
  44. Pansari, 2017, Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 45, 294, 10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Pham, 2009, Rethinking regulatory engagement theory, J. Consum. Psychol., 19, 115, 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Rossmann, 2016, Drivers of user engagement in eWoM communication, J. Serv. Mark., 30, 541, 10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0013 · DOI
  47. Sahadev, 2008, Modelling the consequences of e-service quality, Mark. Intell. Plan., 26, 605, 10.1108/02634500810902857 · DOI
  48. Shankar, 2003, Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments, Int. J. Res. Mark., 20, 153, 10.1016/S0167-8116(03)00016-8 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Shankar, 2010, Mobile marketing in the retailing environment: current insights and future research avenues, J. Interact. Mark. (Mergent, Inc.), 24, 111, 10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Simonson, 2014, What marketers misunderstand about online reviews, Harv. Bus. Rev., 92, 23
  51. Singh, 2000, Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 28, 150, 10.1177/0092070300281014 · DOI · Paper page
  52. So, 2014, The role of customer engagement in building consumer loyalty to tourism brands, J. Travel Res., 55, 64, 10.1177/0047287514541008 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Sridhar Balasubramanian, 2001, The economic leverage of the virtual community, Int. J. Electron. Commer., 5, 103, 10.1080/10864415.2001.11044212 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Srinivasan, 2002, Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences, J. Retail., 78, 41, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00065-3 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Steenkamp, 1998, Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research, J. Consum. Res., 25, 78, 10.1086/209528 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Thakur, 2016, Understanding customer engagement and loyalty: a case of mobile devices for shopping, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 32, 151, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Vivek, 2014, A generalized multidimensional scale for measuring customer engagement, J. Mark. Theory Pract., 22, 401, 10.2753/MTP1069-6679220404 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Yi, 2004, What influences the relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intention? Investigating the effects of adjusted expectations and customer loyalty, Psychol. Mark., 21, 351, 10.1002/mar.20009 · DOI
  59. Zheng, 2015, Building brand loyalty through user engagement in online brand communities in social networking sites, Inf. Technol. People, 28, 90, 10.1108/ITP-08-2013-0144 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Zhou, 2016, Do professional reviews affect online user choices through user reviews? An empirical study, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 33, 202, 10.1080/07421222.2016.1172460 · DOI

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Thakur, R.
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
41
Pages
48-59
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002
OpenAlex
W2772076243
Cited by
336
References
19
FWCI
41.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.