Cited by 146Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Using trait–state models to evaluate the longitudinal consistency of global self-esteem from adolescence to adulthood

Open access
Brent Donnellan, M., Kenny, David A., Trzesniewski, Kali H., Lucas, Richard E., Conger, Rand D.·2012·Journal of Research in Personality

Abstract

The present research used a latent variable trait-state model to evaluate the longitudinal consistency of self-esteem during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Analyses were based on ten administrations of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale (Rosenberg, 1965) spanning the ages of approximately 13 to 32 for a sample of 451 participants. Results indicated that a completely stable trait factor and an autoregressive trait factor accounted for the majority of the variance in latent self-esteem assessments, whereas state factors accounted for about 16% of the variance in repeated assessments of latent self-esteem. The stability of individual differences in self-esteem increased with age consistent with the cumulative continuity principle of personality development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.005

Cites

70 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-esteem rank-order stability increases from lowest in childhood and adolescence to highest in middle age.

    “The stability of individual differences in self-esteem was found to increase from the lowest stability in childhood and adolescence to the highest stability in middle age (Donnellan et al., 2012;Kuster & Orth, 2013;Trzesniewski et al., 2003).”

    From Self‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework (2022) · cites this paper as Donnellan et al., 2012

    The Results (STARTS Models; page unavailable) show that self-esteem stability increased between ages 13 and 32, supporting the adolescence-to-adulthood trend. The study does not establish that stability is lowest in childhood or highest in middle age; its observations begin at age 13 and end at age 32. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent research has decomposed multi-wave self-esteem data into trait and smaller state components.

    “In line with this idea recent research was able to decompose multi-wave data of self-esteem into trait and (smaller) state components (Alessandri et al., 2016;Donnellan et al., 2012).”

    From Self‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework (2022) · cites this paper as Donnellan et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brent Donnellan, M., Kenny, D. A., Trzesniewski, K. H., Lucas, R. E., & Conger, R. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
634-645
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084552780
Cited by
145
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062989, R01MH051361, T32MH019734, K05MH000567)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD047573, R01HD051746, R01HD064687)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-esteem, longitudinal consistency, adolescence, adulthood, personality development, individual differences, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review