Cited by 143Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEarly Childhood Education and Development

Gender differences in response to a school-based mindfulness training intervention for early adolescents

Open access
Kang, Yoona, Rahrig, Hadley, Eichel, Kristina, Niles, Halsey F., Rocha, Tomas, Lepp, Nathaniel E., Gold, Jonathan, Britton, Willoughby B.·2018·Journal of School Psychology

Abstract

Mindfulness training has been used to improve emotional wellbeing in early adolescents. However, little is known about treatment outcome moderators, or individual differences that may differentially impact responses to treatment. The current study focused on gender as a potential moderator for affective outcomes in response to school-based mindfulness training. Sixth grade students (N = 100) were randomly assigned to either the six weeks of mindfulness meditation or the active control group as part of a history class curriculum. Participants in the mindfulness meditation group completed short mindfulness meditation sessions four to five times per week, in addition to didactic instruction (Asian history). The control group received matched experiential activity in addition to didactic instruction (African history) from the same teacher with no meditation component. Self-reported measures of emotional wellbeing/affect, mindfulness, and self-compassion were obtained at pre and post intervention. Meditators reported greater improvement in emotional wellbeing compared to those in the control group. Importantly, gender differences were detected, such that female meditators reported greater increases in positive affect compared to females in the control group, whereas male meditators and control males displayed equivalent gains. Uniquely among females but not males, increases in self-reported self-compassion were associated with improvements in affect. These findings support the efficacy of school-based mindfulness interventions, and interventions tailored to accommodate distinct developmental needs of female and male adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.004

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fernando R, & Keller S (2012). Measuring the efficacy and sustainability of the mindful schools mindfulness-based in-class intervention. Paper presented at the 10th Annual International Scientific Conference: Investigating and integrating mindfulness in medicine, health care, and society; Norwood, MA.
  2. Saltzman A, & Goldin P (2008). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for school-age children Acceptance and mindfulness interventions for children adolescents and families (pp. 139– 161).
  3. Shapiro SL, Brown KW, & Astin JA (2008). Toward the integration of meditation into higher education: A review of research. The center for contemplative mind in society Retrieved from http://www.contemplativemind.org/admin/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/MedandHigherEd.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, Y., Rahrig, H., Eichel, K., Niles, H. F., Rocha, T., Lepp, N. E., Gold, J., & Britton, W. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kang, Yoona
  • Britton, Willoughby B.
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
68
Pages
163-176
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796235155
Cited by
143
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K23-AT006328-01A1)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (UH2AT009145)
  • Lenz Foundation
  • Hershey Foundation
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • Brown University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
mindfulness training, gender differences, early adolescents, emotional well-being, positive affect, self-compassion, school-based intervention, mindfulness meditation, treatment moderators, sixth grade students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Personal Satisfaction, Schools, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Students, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review